{"title":"Strategies for developing pre-clinical medical students’ clinical reasoning based on illness script formation: a systematic review","authors":"Jihyun Si","doi":"10.3946/kjme.2022.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical reasoning training in the pre-clinical phase has recently been considered important; however, when it comes to specific instructional methods for pre-clinical students, much is unknown. Thus, the aim of this review is to explore learning and teaching methods for pre-clinical students’ clinical reasoning development based on illness script formation, their results, and strategies. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Association for Medical Education in Europe. The literature search was performed using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and ERIC databases based on keywords, including “illness script*” AND (“medical student*” OR pre-clinical OR undergraduate). Then, 10 studies among the 91 studies were included in the final analysis. The quality of the selected studies was also appraised using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Diverse teaching and learning methods were used to support the integration of biomedical and clinical knowledge working with patient cases, and their effects were assessed through diverse methods, including illness script richness and maturity, to learner responses. The effects of these interventions were effective in terms of the clinical reasoning development of pre-clinical students. Learning and teaching strategies were synthesized and described. This review found that explicit attempts to promote illness script formation with a structured program rather than informal training lead to positive results, and such formal clinical reasoning programs can provide smooth transition from pre-clinical to clinical experience.","PeriodicalId":37737,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of medical education","volume":"34 1","pages":"49 - 61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2022.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Clinical reasoning training in the pre-clinical phase has recently been considered important; however, when it comes to specific instructional methods for pre-clinical students, much is unknown. Thus, the aim of this review is to explore learning and teaching methods for pre-clinical students’ clinical reasoning development based on illness script formation, their results, and strategies. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Association for Medical Education in Europe. The literature search was performed using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and ERIC databases based on keywords, including “illness script*” AND (“medical student*” OR pre-clinical OR undergraduate). Then, 10 studies among the 91 studies were included in the final analysis. The quality of the selected studies was also appraised using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Diverse teaching and learning methods were used to support the integration of biomedical and clinical knowledge working with patient cases, and their effects were assessed through diverse methods, including illness script richness and maturity, to learner responses. The effects of these interventions were effective in terms of the clinical reasoning development of pre-clinical students. Learning and teaching strategies were synthesized and described. This review found that explicit attempts to promote illness script formation with a structured program rather than informal training lead to positive results, and such formal clinical reasoning programs can provide smooth transition from pre-clinical to clinical experience.
临床前阶段的临床推理训练最近被认为是重要的;然而,当涉及到临床预科学生的具体教学方法时,很多是未知的。因此,本综述的目的是探讨基于疾病脚本形成、结果和策略的临床前学生临床推理发展的学习和教学方法。根据欧洲医学教育协会的指导方针进行了系统审查。文献检索采用Cochrane Library、PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science和ERIC数据库,检索关键词包括“疾病脚本*”和(“医学生*”或临床前或本科生)。然后,91项研究中有10项研究被纳入最终分析。所选研究的质量也使用医学教育研究质量工具进行评价。采用不同的教学方法来支持生物医学和临床知识与患者案例的整合,并通过不同的方法评估其效果,包括疾病脚本的丰富度和成熟度,对学习者的反应。这些干预措施在临床前学生的临床推理发展方面效果显著。对学习和教学策略进行了综合和描述。本综述发现,通过结构化的程序而不是非正式的培训来促进疾病脚本形成的明确尝试会产生积极的结果,并且这种正式的临床推理程序可以提供从临床前到临床经验的平稳过渡。
期刊介绍:
The journal seeks to provide theoretical foundations, practical analysis, and up-to-date developments in health professional education: Curriculum development Teaching and learning Student assessment Educational evaluation Educational management and policy The journal welcomes high-quality papers on all levels of health professional education, including: Undergraduate education Postgraduate training Continuous professional development Interprofessional education.