Proof-of-work blockchains and settlement finality: a functional interpretation

IF 0.4 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Financial Market Infrastructures Pub Date : 2019-07-11 DOI:10.21314/JFMI.2018.111
Ruth Wandhöfer, R. Berndsen
{"title":"Proof-of-work blockchains and settlement finality: a functional interpretation","authors":"Ruth Wandhöfer, R. Berndsen","doi":"10.21314/JFMI.2018.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we aim to provide an interpretation of the legal issue of settlement finality in the context of proof-of-work distributed ledger technology, such as the Bitcoin network. Bitcoin intends to achieve certainty of settlement of its cryptocurrency in a trustless environment, without the need for intermediaries and without recourse to any legal provision. We extend earlier work on functional modeling of the theoretical settlement problem to include blockchains, and we provide a functional interpretation of settlement finality by introducing the notion of degree of settlement finality. In principle, we conclude that functional settlement finality in Bitcoin is preferred to legal enforceability. However, in practice, the Bitcoin blockchain is not suitable for the trusted environment of the regulated financial industry unless well-known issues - such as high energy consumption, low settlement speed, problems with scalability and the 51% attack risk - are resolved.","PeriodicalId":41226,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Market Infrastructures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Market Infrastructures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/JFMI.2018.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this paper, we aim to provide an interpretation of the legal issue of settlement finality in the context of proof-of-work distributed ledger technology, such as the Bitcoin network. Bitcoin intends to achieve certainty of settlement of its cryptocurrency in a trustless environment, without the need for intermediaries and without recourse to any legal provision. We extend earlier work on functional modeling of the theoretical settlement problem to include blockchains, and we provide a functional interpretation of settlement finality by introducing the notion of degree of settlement finality. In principle, we conclude that functional settlement finality in Bitcoin is preferred to legal enforceability. However, in practice, the Bitcoin blockchain is not suitable for the trusted environment of the regulated financial industry unless well-known issues - such as high energy consumption, low settlement speed, problems with scalability and the 51% attack risk - are resolved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作量证明区块链和结算终局性:一种功能解释
在本文中,我们的目标是在工作量证明分布式账本技术(如比特币网络)的背景下,对结算最终性的法律问题进行解释。比特币打算在一个无信任的环境中实现其加密货币结算的确定性,而不需要中介机构,也不需要诉诸任何法律规定。我们将理论结算问题的功能建模的早期工作扩展到包括区块链,并通过引入结算最终程度的概念提供了结算最终性的功能解释。原则上,我们的结论是,比特币的功能结算终局性优于法律可执行性。然而,在实践中,比特币区块链并不适合受监管的金融行业的信任环境,除非解决众所周知的问题,如高能耗、低结算速度、可扩展性问题和51%的攻击风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Construction of hypothetical scenarios for central counterparty stress tests using vine copulas A cost–benefit analysis of anti-procyclicality: analyzing approaches to procyclicality reduction in central counterparty initial margin models Industry adoption scenarios for authoritative data stores using the International Swaps and Derivatives Association Common Domain Model Climate risk and central counterparty risk management Procyclicality of central counterparty margin models: systemic problems need systemic approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1