Lawful inaction: problem issues about the implementation of the operative-investigative activity during the solvation of the crime suppression task

V. Semenchuk
{"title":"Lawful inaction: problem issues about the implementation of the operative-investigative activity during the solvation of the crime suppression task","authors":"V. Semenchuk","doi":"10.31857/s102694520018545-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article describes the problematic issues about the operative-investigative control over the continuing crimes. The author presents the reasons why operative officers don’t immediately suppress crimes. Analysis of judicial practice shows that such forced inaction is recognized as acceptable because of various socially justified reasons, although there is no sufficient legal basis for this. For the solvation of presented problem author proposed to improve the Federal Law “On operative-investigative activity”: establish the conditions for documenting continuing crimes; establish the definitions for the operative-investigative measures and special conditions for the “experimental” measures; provide guarantees for the restoration of the victim’s rights violated due to the necessity of the operative-investigative control over continuing crimes.","PeriodicalId":82769,"journal":{"name":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s102694520018545-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article describes the problematic issues about the operative-investigative control over the continuing crimes. The author presents the reasons why operative officers don’t immediately suppress crimes. Analysis of judicial practice shows that such forced inaction is recognized as acceptable because of various socially justified reasons, although there is no sufficient legal basis for this. For the solvation of presented problem author proposed to improve the Federal Law “On operative-investigative activity”: establish the conditions for documenting continuing crimes; establish the definitions for the operative-investigative measures and special conditions for the “experimental” measures; provide guarantees for the restoration of the victim’s rights violated due to the necessity of the operative-investigative control over continuing crimes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律上的不作为:侦查活动在打击犯罪任务中实施的问题
本文论述了继续犯罪侦查控制中存在的问题。作者提出了执法人员不立即镇压犯罪的原因。对司法实践的分析表明,尽管没有充分的法律依据,但由于各种社会合理的原因,这种强迫不作为被认为是可以接受的。为了解决目前的问题,作者建议改进“关于侦查活动”的联邦法:确立记录持续犯罪的条件;确立侦查性措施的定义和“实验性”措施的特殊条件;为恢复因对持续犯罪实施侦查控制的必要性而被侵犯的被害人权利提供保障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legal protection and rational use of geological heritage in geoparks The Russian system of pre-trial proceedings as a synthesis of different types of criminal procedure Legal regulation circulation of digital rights in United States of America Feignfullness prohibition: administrative and legal research with elements of an economic approach The first Criminal Code of Soviet Russia and the responsibility of professional criminals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1