Development of the citizens measure into a tool to guide clinical practice and its utility for case managers

Chyrell D Bellamy, Liat S. Kriegel, Stacey L. Barrenger, M. Klimczak, J. Rakfeldt, Victoria Benson, Michaella Baker, P. Benedict, Bridgett Williamson, Gillian MacIntyre
{"title":"Development of the citizens measure into a tool to guide clinical practice and its utility for case managers","authors":"Chyrell D Bellamy, Liat S. Kriegel, Stacey L. Barrenger, M. Klimczak, J. Rakfeldt, Victoria Benson, Michaella Baker, P. Benedict, Bridgett Williamson, Gillian MacIntyre","doi":"10.1080/15487768.2017.1338064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A measure of citizenship was developed and validated by Rowe and colleagues (O’Connell, Clayton, & Rowe, 2017). The items clustered around the 5 Rs of citizenship as defined by Rowe et al.: relationships, rights, resources, roles, and rights, and a sense of belonging. Although a measure has its utility in clinical settings, to address time constraints and other administrative burdens expressed by providers in their day-to-day practice, a citizens tool was developed as a practical way that providers can enhance dialogue between providers and clients on citizenship for clients served in mental health and criminal justice reentry settings. This article describes the development of the tool, testing of the tool’s utility with case managers, and implications for practice.","PeriodicalId":72174,"journal":{"name":"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487768.2017.1338064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT A measure of citizenship was developed and validated by Rowe and colleagues (O’Connell, Clayton, & Rowe, 2017). The items clustered around the 5 Rs of citizenship as defined by Rowe et al.: relationships, rights, resources, roles, and rights, and a sense of belonging. Although a measure has its utility in clinical settings, to address time constraints and other administrative burdens expressed by providers in their day-to-day practice, a citizens tool was developed as a practical way that providers can enhance dialogue between providers and clients on citizenship for clients served in mental health and criminal justice reentry settings. This article describes the development of the tool, testing of the tool’s utility with case managers, and implications for practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公民测量的发展成为一种工具,以指导临床实践和它的效用为案例管理者
Rowe及其同事(O 'Connell, Clayton, & Rowe, 2017)开发并验证了公民身份的衡量标准。这些项目集中在Rowe等人定义的5个r的公民:关系,权利,资源,角色和权利,以及归属感。虽然一项措施在临床环境中有其效用,但为了解决提供者在日常实践中表现出的时间限制和其他行政负担,制定了一项公民工具,作为一种切实可行的方式,使提供者能够加强提供者与客户之间关于在精神健康和刑事司法再入环境中服务的客户的公民身份问题的对话。本文描述了该工具的开发,用案例管理器测试该工具的实用程序,以及对实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pilot Test of Using Peer Specialists to Deliver Cognitive-Behavioral Social Skills Training. Is Capability to Manage Finances Stable Over Time? "How do we force six visits on a consumer?": Street-level dilemmas and strategies for person-centered care under Medicaid fee-for-service. Screening homeless Veterans for a voluntary money management skills training program A recovery-oriented peer provider (ROPP) work-role model and prototype measure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1