Good Faith in Construction Contract: A Common Law Perspective

Nurhidayah Abdullah, Ong Tze Chin, Nur Atiqah Nasir, Faizal Kurniawan
{"title":"Good Faith in Construction Contract: A Common Law Perspective","authors":"Nurhidayah Abdullah, Ong Tze Chin, Nur Atiqah Nasir, Faizal Kurniawan","doi":"10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The good faith principle requires contracting parties to be honest as well as consideringtheir contracting partners in performing their contractual duties. In the event, contract clauses are insufficient to protect the interests of the innocent party in a breached contract, the said innocent party may rely on the good faith principle to ensure the fair. However, applying good faith principles to construction contracts is a difficult task. By nature, construction contracts are unique due to the fact that parties (Client and Contractor) are presumed competent to carry out their parts of the contractual obligations. Controversially, the construction contract is often unfairly prejudicial as the Client would customarily have the upper hand in deciding the terms and conditions of a contract. It is the objective of the research to examine the relevancy of application of good faith principle in construction contractsby employingqualitative content analysis. This study adopts a qualitative research approach, mainly employing library and internet resources with the intention to explore relevant legislation, textbooks, journals, research papers and articles.The comparative approach in this paper used content analysis from primary and secondary legal resources of different jurisdictions in the United Kingdom, Malaysia and Australia to compare the application of the good faith principle in the context of construction contracts. The findings of the research revealsthat the adoption and application of the good faith principle in construction contracts is of limited usage even though it is widely usedin general contract law of United Kingdom, Malaysia and Australia.This article contributes to the knowledge of the good faith principle in construction contracts, particularly with standard form contracts, by highlighting the importance of the good faith principle in achieving a fairer functioning of construction contracts in its application.","PeriodicalId":14418,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.02.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The good faith principle requires contracting parties to be honest as well as consideringtheir contracting partners in performing their contractual duties. In the event, contract clauses are insufficient to protect the interests of the innocent party in a breached contract, the said innocent party may rely on the good faith principle to ensure the fair. However, applying good faith principles to construction contracts is a difficult task. By nature, construction contracts are unique due to the fact that parties (Client and Contractor) are presumed competent to carry out their parts of the contractual obligations. Controversially, the construction contract is often unfairly prejudicial as the Client would customarily have the upper hand in deciding the terms and conditions of a contract. It is the objective of the research to examine the relevancy of application of good faith principle in construction contractsby employingqualitative content analysis. This study adopts a qualitative research approach, mainly employing library and internet resources with the intention to explore relevant legislation, textbooks, journals, research papers and articles.The comparative approach in this paper used content analysis from primary and secondary legal resources of different jurisdictions in the United Kingdom, Malaysia and Australia to compare the application of the good faith principle in the context of construction contracts. The findings of the research revealsthat the adoption and application of the good faith principle in construction contracts is of limited usage even though it is widely usedin general contract law of United Kingdom, Malaysia and Australia.This article contributes to the knowledge of the good faith principle in construction contracts, particularly with standard form contracts, by highlighting the importance of the good faith principle in achieving a fairer functioning of construction contracts in its application.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑合同中的诚信:普通法视角
诚信原则要求缔约各方在履行合同义务时既要诚实守信,又要考虑到缔约各方的利益。在合同条款不足以保护被违约方利益的情况下,被违约方可以依靠诚实信用原则来保证公平。然而,将诚信原则应用于建筑合同是一项艰巨的任务。从本质上讲,建筑合同是独一无二的,因为各方(业主和承包商)都被认为有能力履行各自的合同义务。有争议的是,施工合同往往存在不公平的偏见,因为客户通常在决定合同条款和条件方面占上风。本研究的目的是通过定性的内容分析来检验诚信原则在建筑合同中适用的相关性。本研究采用质性研究方法,主要利用图书馆和网络资源,对相关立法、教科书、期刊、研究论文和文章进行探索。本文采用比较法,从英国、马来西亚和澳大利亚等不同司法管辖区的一级和二级法律资源中进行内容分析,比较诚信原则在建筑合同中的适用情况。研究结果表明,尽管诚信原则在英国、马来西亚和澳大利亚的一般合同法中被广泛使用,但在建筑合同中采用和适用的诚信原则是有限的。本文通过强调诚信原则在实现建筑合同在其适用中更公平运作方面的重要性,有助于了解建筑合同中的诚信原则,特别是标准格式合同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Preferensi Warga Kota Bandar Lampung Terhadap Angkutan Umum Kajian Tekno Ekonomi pada Pembangunan Jalur Ganda Rel Kereta Api Segmen Tanjungkarang-Kotabumi di Provinsi Lampung Studi Manajemen Operasi dan Pemeliharaan Jalan Tol Pekanbaru-Dumai Pengaruh Analisis Arus Kas dalam Proyek Konstruksi: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis Tinjauan Standar Protokol Kesehatan Penyakit Menular Sektor Konstruksi: Studi Kasus COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1