Body Size and Outcomes in Dialysis and Transplant Patients – Does it Matter?

Prilozi Pub Date : 2016-11-01 DOI:10.1515/prilozi-2016-0016
M. Sever
{"title":"Body Size and Outcomes in Dialysis and Transplant Patients – Does it Matter?","authors":"M. Sever","doi":"10.1515/prilozi-2016-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The terminologies of “body size”, “body mass index (BMI)”, “body weight”, “large BMI” and “obesity” are controversial for defining the effects of “adiposity” or “fat excess” on the outcomes of dialysis and transplant patients. However, probably these terminologies will be continued to be used in the future as well, because of being older and simpler terminologies. In the general population obesity is a powerful risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, while, it conferred a survival advantage to dialysis patients. However, this may be a oversimplification, since obesity may still be a risk factor in non-sarcopenic hemodialysis patients. Obesity is associated with early post-transplant adverse effects (i.e. delayed graft function, graft failure, wound infections, also transplant costs) and unfavorable graft and patient survival. However, thanks to safer immunosuppressive protocols, recently graft and patient survival is similar in obese as those of the non-obese patients. On the other hand, morbid obesity may still be a cause of unfavorable patient and graft survival. Since obese transplant recipients have better life expectancy as compared to wait-listed hemodialysis patients, they should be transplanted as well, while morbidly obese patients should be asked to lose weight before being placed in the waiting lists.","PeriodicalId":87202,"journal":{"name":"Prilozi","volume":"22 1","pages":"49 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prilozi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/prilozi-2016-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The terminologies of “body size”, “body mass index (BMI)”, “body weight”, “large BMI” and “obesity” are controversial for defining the effects of “adiposity” or “fat excess” on the outcomes of dialysis and transplant patients. However, probably these terminologies will be continued to be used in the future as well, because of being older and simpler terminologies. In the general population obesity is a powerful risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, while, it conferred a survival advantage to dialysis patients. However, this may be a oversimplification, since obesity may still be a risk factor in non-sarcopenic hemodialysis patients. Obesity is associated with early post-transplant adverse effects (i.e. delayed graft function, graft failure, wound infections, also transplant costs) and unfavorable graft and patient survival. However, thanks to safer immunosuppressive protocols, recently graft and patient survival is similar in obese as those of the non-obese patients. On the other hand, morbid obesity may still be a cause of unfavorable patient and graft survival. Since obese transplant recipients have better life expectancy as compared to wait-listed hemodialysis patients, they should be transplanted as well, while morbidly obese patients should be asked to lose weight before being placed in the waiting lists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
透析和移植患者的身体大小和预后——重要吗?
“体型”、“身体质量指数(BMI)”、“体重”、“大BMI”和“肥胖”等术语在定义“肥胖”或“脂肪过量”对透析和移植患者预后的影响时存在争议。但是,由于这些术语更老、更简单,将来可能还会继续使用。在一般人群中,肥胖是心血管疾病发病率和死亡率的一个强大的危险因素,同时,它赋予透析患者生存优势。然而,这可能是一种过度简化,因为肥胖可能仍然是非肌肉减少性血液透析患者的一个危险因素。肥胖与移植后早期不良反应(即移植物功能延迟、移植物衰竭、伤口感染以及移植成本)以及不利的移植物和患者生存有关。然而,由于更安全的免疫抑制方案,最近肥胖患者的移植物和患者存活率与非肥胖患者相似。另一方面,病态肥胖可能仍然是患者和移植物生存不利的原因。由于肥胖的移植受者比等待血液透析的患者有更好的预期寿命,他们也应该接受移植,而病态肥胖的患者在被列入等待名单之前应该要求减肥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prophylactic Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces in Elective Lower Limb Amputations Continuous Peripheral Block as a Pain Treatment for Redressment and Physical Therapy in a 7-Year-Old Child – A Case Report Childbirth-Related Psychological Trauma Author’s Response to Letter to the Editor: Is Opioid-Free General Anesthesia More Superior for Postoperative Pain Versus Opioid General Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Renal Transplantat Recipients: A Case Series and Review of the Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1