Drag Assessment for Boundary Layer Control Schemes with Mass Injection

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS Flow, Turbulence and Combustion Pub Date : 2023-08-15 DOI:10.1007/s10494-023-00462-x
Georg Fahland, Marco Atzori, Annika Frede, Alexander Stroh, Bettina Frohnapfel, Davide Gatti
{"title":"Drag Assessment for Boundary Layer Control Schemes with Mass Injection","authors":"Georg Fahland,&nbsp;Marco Atzori,&nbsp;Annika Frede,&nbsp;Alexander Stroh,&nbsp;Bettina Frohnapfel,&nbsp;Davide Gatti","doi":"10.1007/s10494-023-00462-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study considers uniform blowing in turbulent boundary layers as active flow control scheme for drag reduction on airfoils. The focus lies on the important question of how to quantify the drag reduction potential of this control scheme correctly. It is demonstrated that mass injection causes the <i>body drag</i> (the drag resulting from the stresses on the body) to differ from the <i>wake survey drag</i> (the momentum deficit in the wake of an airfoil), which is classically used in experiments as a surrogate for the former. This difference is related to the <i>boundary layer control (BLC) penalty</i>, an unavoidable drag portion which reflects the effort of a mass-injecting boundary layer control scheme. This is independent of how the control is implemented. With an integral momentum budget, we show that for the present control scheme, the wake survey drag contains the BLC penalty and is thus a measure for the <i>inclusive drag</i> of the airfoil, i.e. the one required to determine net drag reduction. The concept of the inclusive drag is extended also to boundary layers using the von Kàrmàn equation. This means that with mass injection the friction drag only is not sufficient to assess drag reduction also in canonical flows. Large Eddy Simulations and Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of the flow around airfoils are utilized to demonstrate the significance of this distinction for the scheme of uniform blowing. When the inclusive drag is properly accounted for, control scenarios previously considered to yield drag reduction actually show drag increase.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":559,"journal":{"name":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","volume":"113 1","pages":"119 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10494-023-00462-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10494-023-00462-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study considers uniform blowing in turbulent boundary layers as active flow control scheme for drag reduction on airfoils. The focus lies on the important question of how to quantify the drag reduction potential of this control scheme correctly. It is demonstrated that mass injection causes the body drag (the drag resulting from the stresses on the body) to differ from the wake survey drag (the momentum deficit in the wake of an airfoil), which is classically used in experiments as a surrogate for the former. This difference is related to the boundary layer control (BLC) penalty, an unavoidable drag portion which reflects the effort of a mass-injecting boundary layer control scheme. This is independent of how the control is implemented. With an integral momentum budget, we show that for the present control scheme, the wake survey drag contains the BLC penalty and is thus a measure for the inclusive drag of the airfoil, i.e. the one required to determine net drag reduction. The concept of the inclusive drag is extended also to boundary layers using the von Kàrmàn equation. This means that with mass injection the friction drag only is not sufficient to assess drag reduction also in canonical flows. Large Eddy Simulations and Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of the flow around airfoils are utilized to demonstrate the significance of this distinction for the scheme of uniform blowing. When the inclusive drag is properly accounted for, control scenarios previously considered to yield drag reduction actually show drag increase.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带质量喷射的边界层控制方案的阻力评估
本研究考虑将湍流边界层中的均匀吹气作为主动流控制方案,以减少机翼的阻力。重点在于如何正确量化这种控制方案的减阻潜力这一重要问题。实验证明,质量喷射会导致机身阻力(机身应力导致的阻力)不同于尾流测量阻力(机翼尾流中的动量损失),后者在实验中通常被用作前者的替代物。这种差异与边界层控制(BLC)惩罚有关,边界层控制惩罚是不可避免的阻力部分,反映了质量注入边界层控制方案的努力。这与如何实施控制无关。通过积分动量预算,我们表明,对于目前的控制方案,尾流调查阻力包含 BLC 惩罚,因此是对机翼包容性阻力的测量,即确定净阻力减少所需的阻力。利用 von Kàrmàn 方程,包容性阻力的概念也扩展到了边界层。这意味着,在典型流动中,仅用质量喷射的摩擦阻力不足以评估阻力的减少。大涡流模拟和机翼周围流动的雷诺平均纳维-斯托克斯模拟被用来证明这种区别对于均匀吹气方案的重要性。当包容性阻力得到适当考虑时,之前被认为会减少阻力的控制方案实际上会增加阻力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Flow, Turbulence and Combustion provides a global forum for the publication of original and innovative research results that contribute to the solution of fundamental and applied problems encountered in single-phase, multi-phase and reacting flows, in both idealized and real systems. The scope of coverage encompasses topics in fluid dynamics, scalar transport, multi-physics interactions and flow control. From time to time the journal publishes Special or Theme Issues featuring invited articles. Contributions may report research that falls within the broad spectrum of analytical, computational and experimental methods. This includes research conducted in academia, industry and a variety of environmental and geophysical sectors. Turbulence, transition and associated phenomena are expected to play a significant role in the majority of studies reported, although non-turbulent flows, typical of those in micro-devices, would be regarded as falling within the scope covered. The emphasis is on originality, timeliness, quality and thematic fit, as exemplified by the title of the journal and the qualifications described above. Relevance to real-world problems and industrial applications are regarded as strengths.
期刊最新文献
Stochastic Fields/LES of Partially-Premixed Lean Hydrogen Flames with Swirl-Axial Air Injection Experimental Closure of Mean Reaction-Progress Balance in \(\mathbf{NH}_3/\mathbf{CH}_4\) Turbulent Premixed Flames Turbulent Flow and Air Exchange Within Alternating Building-Vegetation-Constrained Canyons: Evaluation of Leaf-Area-Density Impacts Sparse Sensor Placement for a Cyclonic Burner under MILD Combustion Conditions Correction: Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Acoustic Response of a Hollow-cone Fuel Spray in a Swirling Air Flow.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1