Initial Validation of the Cybersecurity Concept Inventory: Pilot Testing and Expert Review

Spencer E. Offenberger, Geoffrey L. Herman, Peter A. H. Peterson, A. Sherman, Enis Golaszewski, Travis Scheponik, Linda Oliva
{"title":"Initial Validation of the Cybersecurity Concept Inventory: Pilot Testing and Expert Review","authors":"Spencer E. Offenberger, Geoffrey L. Herman, Peter A. H. Peterson, A. Sherman, Enis Golaszewski, Travis Scheponik, Linda Oliva","doi":"10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze expert review and student performance data to evaluate the validity of the Cybersecurity Concept Inventory (CCI) for assessing student knowledge of core cybersecurity concepts after a first course on the topic. A panel of 12 experts in cybersecurity reviewed the CCI, and 142 students from six different institutions took the CCI as a pilot test. The panel reviewed each item of the CCI and the overwhelming majority rated every item as measuring appropriate cybersecurity knowledge. We administered the CCI to students taking a first cybersecurity course either online or proctored by the course instructor. We applied classical test theory to evaluate the quality of the CCI. This evaluation showed that the CCI is sufficiently reliable for measuring student knowledge of cybersecurity and that the CCI may be too difficult as a whole. We describe the results of the expert review and the pilot test and provide recommendations for the continued improvement of the CCI.","PeriodicalId":6700,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"50 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We analyze expert review and student performance data to evaluate the validity of the Cybersecurity Concept Inventory (CCI) for assessing student knowledge of core cybersecurity concepts after a first course on the topic. A panel of 12 experts in cybersecurity reviewed the CCI, and 142 students from six different institutions took the CCI as a pilot test. The panel reviewed each item of the CCI and the overwhelming majority rated every item as measuring appropriate cybersecurity knowledge. We administered the CCI to students taking a first cybersecurity course either online or proctored by the course instructor. We applied classical test theory to evaluate the quality of the CCI. This evaluation showed that the CCI is sufficiently reliable for measuring student knowledge of cybersecurity and that the CCI may be too difficult as a whole. We describe the results of the expert review and the pilot test and provide recommendations for the continued improvement of the CCI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络安全概念清单的初步验证:试点测试和专家评审
我们分析了专家评论和学生表现数据,以评估网络安全概念清单(CCI)的有效性,用于评估学生对核心网络安全概念的知识。一个由12名网络安全专家组成的小组审查了CCI,来自6个不同机构的142名学生参加了CCI作为试点测试。专家组审查了CCI的每个项目,绝大多数人将每个项目评为衡量适当的网络安全知识。我们对参加第一次网络安全课程的学生进行了CCI测试,这些学生要么在线学习,要么由课程讲师监考。我们运用经典测试理论对CCI的质量进行了评价。该评估表明,CCI在衡量学生的网络安全知识方面足够可靠,而且CCI整体上可能过于困难。我们描述了专家评审和试点测试的结果,并提出了继续改进CCI的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning professional software development skills by contributing to Open Source projects Development of a teaching plan to support learning activities of exploratory test design and execution Practical Strategies to Mentor around Hidden Curriculum Pathways in Engineering Impact on Second Language Writing via an Intelligent Writing Assistant and Metacognitive Training CURUMIM: A Proposal of an Intelligent Tutor System to Teach Trigonometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1