Pre-COVID conventional offline teaching v/s intra-COVID online teaching: A descriptive map of preference patterns among first year M.B.B.S students

R. Bhardwaj, S. Hathila, Himanshu Joshi, V. Vaniya
{"title":"Pre-COVID conventional offline teaching v/s intra-COVID online teaching: A descriptive map of preference patterns among first year M.B.B.S students","authors":"R. Bhardwaj, S. Hathila, Himanshu Joshi, V. Vaniya","doi":"10.4103/amit.amit_34_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Medical education today is equipped with an armamentarium of newer online-based methods of correspondence courses, computerized virtual patient simulation, many open online courses in medical sciences, and tele-learning. The sudden, unplanned change from conventional teaching to online teaching during COVID-19 poses unique challenges and opportunities for teachers and learners, both. Many themes and principles have emerged for good online teaching learning and assessment practices (GOTLAP). Materials and Methods: The present study, involving 392 MBBS first year students from two universities, was conducted with an aim of comparing students' perception regarding online and offline teaching methodology, and online v/s offline method of assessment and to recommend the principles of GOTLAP. Data collected were analyzed by Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, and Threat (SWOT) analysis to provide a focused measure on how students perceive the program of online teaching and assessment. Results: In the present study, majority of the students (approximately 49.6%) have shown preference for offline teaching methodology, 22.9% has shown similar preference for both methods, while 27.5% has shown preference for the offline teaching method. SWOT analysis applied on qualitative data is a useful tool for assessing our present status in online learning and laying a ground work for formulating GOTLAP and a plan of future strategy. Conclusions: The GOTLAP principles can effectively pave way for the incorporation of blended learning (currently underutilized) in undergraduate medical education.","PeriodicalId":32506,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica International","volume":"105 1","pages":"28 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/amit.amit_34_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Medical education today is equipped with an armamentarium of newer online-based methods of correspondence courses, computerized virtual patient simulation, many open online courses in medical sciences, and tele-learning. The sudden, unplanned change from conventional teaching to online teaching during COVID-19 poses unique challenges and opportunities for teachers and learners, both. Many themes and principles have emerged for good online teaching learning and assessment practices (GOTLAP). Materials and Methods: The present study, involving 392 MBBS first year students from two universities, was conducted with an aim of comparing students' perception regarding online and offline teaching methodology, and online v/s offline method of assessment and to recommend the principles of GOTLAP. Data collected were analyzed by Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, and Threat (SWOT) analysis to provide a focused measure on how students perceive the program of online teaching and assessment. Results: In the present study, majority of the students (approximately 49.6%) have shown preference for offline teaching methodology, 22.9% has shown similar preference for both methods, while 27.5% has shown preference for the offline teaching method. SWOT analysis applied on qualitative data is a useful tool for assessing our present status in online learning and laying a ground work for formulating GOTLAP and a plan of future strategy. Conclusions: The GOTLAP principles can effectively pave way for the incorporation of blended learning (currently underutilized) in undergraduate medical education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎前传统线下教学vs新冠肺炎期间在线教学:一年级mba学生偏好模式的描述性地图
导读:今天的医学教育配备了一系列新的基于网络的函授课程、计算机虚拟病人模拟、许多医学科学的在线开放课程和远程学习方法。在2019冠状病毒病期间,从传统教学到在线教学的突然、计划外的转变给教师和学习者都带来了独特的挑战和机遇。关于良好的在线教学、学习和评估实践(GOTLAP),已经出现了许多主题和原则。材料与方法:本研究涉及来自两所大学的392名MBBS一年级学生,旨在比较学生对在线和离线教学方法,在线和离线评估方法的看法,并推荐GOTLAP的原则。收集到的数据通过优势、劣势、机会和威胁(SWOT)分析进行分析,以提供学生如何看待在线教学和评估计划的重点措施。结果:在本研究中,大多数学生(约49.6%)对线下教学方法表现出偏好,22.9%的学生对两种方法都表现出相似的偏好,27.5%的学生对线下教学方法表现出偏好。对定性数据进行SWOT分析是评估我们在线学习现状的有用工具,为制定GOTLAP和未来战略计划奠定基础。结论:GOTLAP原则可以有效地为将混合学习(目前未充分利用)纳入本科医学教育铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and the factors associated with self-medication practice: A community-based cross-sectional study in an Urban Area of Purba Bardhaman, West Bengal, India The new 2021 world health organization classification of central nervous system tumor A study of the medical record department's experience, competence, and application at a tertiary care hospital Effectiveness of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as an adjunct in the treatment of enteric fever in children: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial in Southern India Comparative study on the effects and complications of transverse insertion of two fine gauge quincke's spinal needles 26 and 29 G in spinal anesthesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1