Taking the relationship to the next level: a comparison of how supporters converse with charities on facebook and twitter

Christopher Phethean, T. Tiropanis, L. Harris
{"title":"Taking the relationship to the next level: a comparison of how supporters converse with charities on facebook and twitter","authors":"Christopher Phethean, T. Tiropanis, L. Harris","doi":"10.1145/2615569.2615648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media provide a unique opportunity for charities to reach a large audience with whom they can engage in productive two-way conversations. This abstract reports findings from a study that seeks to determine the extent to which these conversations occur, and whether they differ between Facebook and Twitter. Differences arise showing that Facebook receives more conversations in response to the charities' own posts. However, on Twitter more comments are made per each engaged supporter, which could represent more unsolicited discussion that provides an alternative type of value.","PeriodicalId":93136,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... ACM Web Science Conference. ACM Web Science Conference","volume":"6 1","pages":"271-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... ACM Web Science Conference. ACM Web Science Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2615569.2615648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Social media provide a unique opportunity for charities to reach a large audience with whom they can engage in productive two-way conversations. This abstract reports findings from a study that seeks to determine the extent to which these conversations occur, and whether they differ between Facebook and Twitter. Differences arise showing that Facebook receives more conversations in response to the charities' own posts. However, on Twitter more comments are made per each engaged supporter, which could represent more unsolicited discussion that provides an alternative type of value.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将这种关系提升到下一个层次:比较支持者如何在facebook和twitter上与慈善机构交谈
社交媒体为慈善机构提供了一个独特的机会,可以接触到大量的受众,与他们进行富有成效的双向对话。这篇摘要报道了一项研究的结果,该研究旨在确定这些对话发生的程度,以及它们在Facebook和Twitter之间是否不同。不同之处在于,Facebook收到了更多关于慈善机构自己帖子的回复。然而,在Twitter上,每个参与的支持者都有更多的评论,这可能代表了更多的主动讨论,提供了另一种价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opinions on Homeopathy for COVID-19 on Twitter. An Initial Study of Depression Detection on Mandarin Textual through BERT Model WebSci '22: 14th ACM Web Science Conference 2022, Barcelona, Spain, June 26 - 29, 2022 WebSci '21: 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021, Virtual Event, United Kingdom, 21-25 June, 2021, Companion Publication In conversation with Martha Lane Fox and Wendy Hall on the Future of the Internet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1