Multi-Agent Path Finding: A New Boolean Encoding

IF 4.5 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research Pub Date : 2022-09-29 DOI:10.1613/jair.1.13818
Roberto Asín Achá, Rodrigo López, Sebastián Hagedorn, Jorge A. Baier
{"title":"Multi-Agent Path Finding: A New Boolean Encoding","authors":"Roberto Asín Achá, Rodrigo López, Sebastián Hagedorn, Jorge A. Baier","doi":"10.1613/jair.1.13818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-agent pathfinding (MAPF) is an NP-hard problem. As such, dense maps may be very hard to solve optimally. In such scenarios, compilation-based approaches, via Boolean satisfiability (SAT) and answer set programming (ASP), have been shown to outperform heuristic-search-based approaches, such as conflict-based search (CBS). In this paper, we propose a new Boolean encoding for MAPF, and show how to implement it in ASP and MaxSAT. A feature that distinguishes our encoding from existing ones is that swap and follow conflicts are encoded using binary clauses, which can be exploited by current conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) solvers. In addition, the number of clauses used to encode swap and follow conflicts do not depend on the number of agents, allowing us to scale better. For MaxSAT, we study different ways in which we may combine the MSU3 and LSU algorithms for maximum performance. In our experimental evaluation, we used square grids, ranging from 20 x 20 to 50 x 50 cells, and warehouse maps, with a varying number of agents and obstacles. We compared against representative solvers of the state-of-the-art, including the search-based algorithm CBS, the ASP-based solver ASP-MAPF, and the branch-and-cut-and-price hybrid solver, BCP. We observe that the ASP implementation of our encoding, ASP-MAPF2 outperforms other solvers in most of our experiments. The MaxSAT implementation of our encoding, MtMS shows best performance in relatively small warehouse maps when the number of agents is large, which are the instances with closer resemblance to hard puzzle-like problems.","PeriodicalId":54877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research","volume":"98 1","pages":"323-350"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.13818","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Multi-agent pathfinding (MAPF) is an NP-hard problem. As such, dense maps may be very hard to solve optimally. In such scenarios, compilation-based approaches, via Boolean satisfiability (SAT) and answer set programming (ASP), have been shown to outperform heuristic-search-based approaches, such as conflict-based search (CBS). In this paper, we propose a new Boolean encoding for MAPF, and show how to implement it in ASP and MaxSAT. A feature that distinguishes our encoding from existing ones is that swap and follow conflicts are encoded using binary clauses, which can be exploited by current conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) solvers. In addition, the number of clauses used to encode swap and follow conflicts do not depend on the number of agents, allowing us to scale better. For MaxSAT, we study different ways in which we may combine the MSU3 and LSU algorithms for maximum performance. In our experimental evaluation, we used square grids, ranging from 20 x 20 to 50 x 50 cells, and warehouse maps, with a varying number of agents and obstacles. We compared against representative solvers of the state-of-the-art, including the search-based algorithm CBS, the ASP-based solver ASP-MAPF, and the branch-and-cut-and-price hybrid solver, BCP. We observe that the ASP implementation of our encoding, ASP-MAPF2 outperforms other solvers in most of our experiments. The MaxSAT implementation of our encoding, MtMS shows best performance in relatively small warehouse maps when the number of agents is large, which are the instances with closer resemblance to hard puzzle-like problems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多智能体寻径:一种新的布尔编码
多智能体寻路(MAPF)是一个np难题。因此,密集地图可能很难以最佳方式解决。在这种情况下,基于编译的方法,通过布尔可满足性(SAT)和答案集编程(ASP),已被证明优于基于启发式搜索的方法,如基于冲突的搜索(CBS)。本文提出了一种新的MAPF布尔编码方法,并给出了如何在ASP和MaxSAT中实现它。将我们的编码与现有编码区分开来的一个特征是,swap和follow冲突是使用二进制子句编码的,当前的冲突驱动子句学习(CDCL)解决方案可以利用二进制子句。此外,用于编码交换和跟踪冲突的子句的数量不依赖于代理的数量,从而允许我们更好地扩展。对于MaxSAT,我们研究了将MSU3和LSU算法结合在一起以获得最大性能的不同方法。在我们的实验评估中,我们使用方形网格,范围从20 x 20到50 x 50单元,以及仓库地图,具有不同数量的代理和障碍物。我们比较了最先进的代表性求解器,包括基于搜索的算法CBS,基于asp的求解器ASP-MAPF,以及分支-降价-价格混合求解器BCP。我们观察到我们编码的ASP实现,ASP- mapf2在我们的大多数实验中优于其他求解器。我们编码的MaxSAT实现MtMS在相对较小的仓库映射中显示出最佳性能,当代理数量很大时,这些实例更类似于困难的谜题问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: JAIR(ISSN 1076 - 9757) covers all areas of artificial intelligence (AI), publishing refereed research articles, survey articles, and technical notes. Established in 1993 as one of the first electronic scientific journals, JAIR is indexed by INSPEC, Science Citation Index, and MathSciNet. JAIR reviews papers within approximately three months of submission and publishes accepted articles on the internet immediately upon receiving the final versions. JAIR articles are published for free distribution on the internet by the AI Access Foundation, and for purchase in bound volumes by AAAI Press.
期刊最新文献
Collective Belief Revision Competitive Equilibria with a Constant Number of Chores Improving Resource Allocations by Sharing in Pairs A General Model for Aggregating Annotations Across Simple, Complex, and Multi-Object Annotation Tasks Asymptotics of K-Fold Cross Validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1