Engineering Design and Children: A Systematic Literature Review

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology Pub Date : 2023-04-20 DOI:10.46328/ijemst.2669
Hoda Ehsan, J. Quintana-Cifuentes, Ş. Purzer, Abeera P. Rehmat
{"title":"Engineering Design and Children: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Hoda Ehsan, J. Quintana-Cifuentes, Ş. Purzer, Abeera P. Rehmat","doi":"10.46328/ijemst.2669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last two decades, a remarkable number of studies have examined the role of engineering education in supporting knowledge and skill building among children. In this paper, we present a synthesis of this literature to evaluate the added value of pre-college engineering design experiences at the elementary level, and ways researchers have gathered evidence of children’s development of this knowledge and skills. We have conducted a systematic literature review. The initial search across four different databases with relevant keywords resulted in over 3000 journal articles and conference papers. In a two-rounds screening, by applying the inclusion criteria first to titles and abstracts, and then to the full text, 78 peer-reviewed publications were included in this systematic literature review. We summarized and synthesized empirical evidence of student learning and engagement in engineering design activities, and approaches they were assessed and elicited. The thematic analysis revealed five categories of knowledge and skills: (1) disciplinary content knowledge; (2) engineering design practices, (3) engineering thinking skills; (4) professional skills; and (5) career awareness. Additionally, the assessment and evaluation approaches that were used for each of these categories were identified and discussed. The findings provide collective evidence of variety in student learning opportunities but also suggest the need to carefully define these knowledge and skills. Since a wide range of evaluation approaches were used to capture similar outcomes, we conclude that it is imperative to develop a shared research agenda by carefully defining the knowledge and skills we expect children to learn.","PeriodicalId":44518,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last two decades, a remarkable number of studies have examined the role of engineering education in supporting knowledge and skill building among children. In this paper, we present a synthesis of this literature to evaluate the added value of pre-college engineering design experiences at the elementary level, and ways researchers have gathered evidence of children’s development of this knowledge and skills. We have conducted a systematic literature review. The initial search across four different databases with relevant keywords resulted in over 3000 journal articles and conference papers. In a two-rounds screening, by applying the inclusion criteria first to titles and abstracts, and then to the full text, 78 peer-reviewed publications were included in this systematic literature review. We summarized and synthesized empirical evidence of student learning and engagement in engineering design activities, and approaches they were assessed and elicited. The thematic analysis revealed five categories of knowledge and skills: (1) disciplinary content knowledge; (2) engineering design practices, (3) engineering thinking skills; (4) professional skills; and (5) career awareness. Additionally, the assessment and evaluation approaches that were used for each of these categories were identified and discussed. The findings provide collective evidence of variety in student learning opportunities but also suggest the need to carefully define these knowledge and skills. Since a wide range of evaluation approaches were used to capture similar outcomes, we conclude that it is imperative to develop a shared research agenda by carefully defining the knowledge and skills we expect children to learn.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工程设计与儿童:系统文献综述
在过去的二十年里,大量的研究调查了工程教育在支持儿童知识和技能建设方面的作用。在本文中,我们综合了这些文献,以评估小学阶段大学前工程设计经验的附加价值,以及研究人员收集儿童发展这些知识和技能的证据的方式。我们进行了系统的文献综述。最初在四个不同的数据库中搜索相关关键词,结果是3000多篇期刊文章和会议论文。在两轮筛选中,通过将纳入标准首先应用于标题和摘要,然后应用于全文,78篇同行评议的出版物被纳入本系统文献综述。我们总结和综合了学生在工程设计活动中的学习和参与的经验证据,以及评估和引出的方法。专题分析揭示了五大类知识技能:(1)学科内容知识;(2)工程设计实践;(3)工程思维能力;(四)专业技能;(5)职业意识。此外,还确定并讨论了用于每个类别的评估和评价方法。这些发现为学生学习机会的多样性提供了集体证据,但也表明有必要仔细定义这些知识和技能。由于使用了广泛的评估方法来获取类似的结果,我们得出结论,必须通过仔细定义我们期望儿童学习的知识和技能来制定共同的研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
23.10%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
The Degree of Special Education Teachers’ Employment of Electronic Educational Games in Teaching Disabled Students Focus on the Assessment Concerns of In-service and Pre-service Mathematics Teachers Stereotypes and Views of Science among Elementary Students: Gender and Grade Differences Systematic Review: Trends in Intelligent Tutoring Systems in Mathematics Teaching and Learning Computational Thinking Research in Mathematics Learning in the Last Decade: A Bibliometric Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1