Analysis of the views of primary school teachers and administrators regarding the certificate of merit

Sezgin Temel, Yaşar Çeli̇k
{"title":"Analysis of the views of primary school teachers and administrators regarding the certificate of merit","authors":"Sezgin Temel, Yaşar Çeli̇k","doi":"10.33711/yyuefd.1073689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of this research is an in-dept analysis of the opinions of teachers who have received the certificate of merit and school administrators on the reward. The study uses the phenomenology pattern, which is one of qualitative research patterns. Data collection process was conducted between May-June of the Academic Year 2020-2021. The study group consists of 14 elementary school teachers and 10 school administrators determined using the criterion sampling method, which is one of purposeful sampling methods. Research data was collected using semi-structured interview forms prepared by the researchers. The content analysis method was used to analyze the data. It was determined that the teachers were rewarded the certificate based on projects, social and cultural activities, teacher performance, improving the physical equipment of the school, increasing the success level of students, carrying out social service and use of union and personal relationships. On the other hand, some school administrators and teachers stated that there was not fair practice in the process of rewarding the certificate of merit. For teachers, being rewarded the certificate of merit was evaluated in various ways by their colleagues and school administrators. In addition, the majority of the teachers stated that they were motivated more as a result of receiving the certificate of merit. The majority of the teachers who received the certificate of merit also stated that the reward did not provide any benefits apart from some partial financial gain. Moreover, they expressed that they were motivated more after receiving the certificate. All teachers agreed that the certificate of merit should be rewarded, and they are supported by the opinions of school administrators in this regard. Overall, the participants emphasized that there should be clear criteria and fair practice in the process of rewarding the certificate of merit.","PeriodicalId":23699,"journal":{"name":"Yuzunci Yil Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yuzunci Yil Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.1073689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main purpose of this research is an in-dept analysis of the opinions of teachers who have received the certificate of merit and school administrators on the reward. The study uses the phenomenology pattern, which is one of qualitative research patterns. Data collection process was conducted between May-June of the Academic Year 2020-2021. The study group consists of 14 elementary school teachers and 10 school administrators determined using the criterion sampling method, which is one of purposeful sampling methods. Research data was collected using semi-structured interview forms prepared by the researchers. The content analysis method was used to analyze the data. It was determined that the teachers were rewarded the certificate based on projects, social and cultural activities, teacher performance, improving the physical equipment of the school, increasing the success level of students, carrying out social service and use of union and personal relationships. On the other hand, some school administrators and teachers stated that there was not fair practice in the process of rewarding the certificate of merit. For teachers, being rewarded the certificate of merit was evaluated in various ways by their colleagues and school administrators. In addition, the majority of the teachers stated that they were motivated more as a result of receiving the certificate of merit. The majority of the teachers who received the certificate of merit also stated that the reward did not provide any benefits apart from some partial financial gain. Moreover, they expressed that they were motivated more after receiving the certificate. All teachers agreed that the certificate of merit should be rewarded, and they are supported by the opinions of school administrators in this regard. Overall, the participants emphasized that there should be clear criteria and fair practice in the process of rewarding the certificate of merit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小学教师与行政人员对优异证书的看法分析
本研究的主要目的是深入分析获得优异证书的教师和学校管理者对奖励的看法。本研究采用了质性研究模式之一的现象学模式。数据收集过程在2020-2021学年的5月至6月期间进行。研究小组由14名小学教师和10名学校管理人员组成,采用标准抽样法确定,这是有目的抽样法之一。研究数据是通过研究者准备的半结构化访谈表格收集的。采用内容分析法对数据进行分析。确定教师的奖励证书是基于项目,社会和文化活动,教师表现,改善学校的物理设备,提高学生的成功水平,开展社会服务和利用工会和个人关系。另一方面,一些学校管理人员和教师表示,在颁发优异证书的过程中存在不公平的做法。对于教师来说,他们的同事和学校管理人员会以各种方式评估他们获得的优异证书。此外,大多数教师表示,由于获得了优异证书,他们的积极性更高。大多数获得优异证书的教师也表示,除了一些部分的经济收益外,奖励并没有提供任何好处。此外,他们表示,获得证书后,他们的动力更大了。所有教师都同意应该奖励奖状,并且他们在这方面得到了学校管理人员的支持。总的说来,嘉宾都强调在颁授优异证书的过程中,应有明确的标准和公平的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determining Value Preferences in Teacher Identity Kültüre Dayalı Günlük Hayatta Kullanılan Söz Kalıpları Kullanımının Öğrencilerin Öznel İyi Oluşuna, Arkadaşlık İlişkisine ve Akran Zorbalığına Etkisi Çocuklar İçin Dijital Bağımlılık Ölçeğini Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması Ortaokul Matematik Öğretmeni Adaylarının Etkinlik Geliştirme Süreçlerinin Gerçek Hayatla İlişkilendirme Açısından İncelenmesi Farklı Öğrenme Ortamlarında Kullanılan Bilgisayar ve Mobil Uygulama Destekli Etkinliklerin Etkililiğinin Araştırılması
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1