Effect of Adaption-level and Range-frequency on Subjective Judgment

IF 0.2 Q4 LINGUISTICS Journal of Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2019-03-31 DOI:10.17791/JCS.2019.20.1.111
Sangyun Seo, Sung Chan Cho, Hoon Young Lee
{"title":"Effect of Adaption-level and Range-frequency on Subjective Judgment","authors":"Sangyun Seo, Sung Chan Cho, Hoon Young Lee","doi":"10.17791/JCS.2019.20.1.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study intends to provide a better understanding of the cognitive representation of reference points, and how consumers formulate their reference levels in a judgment task. To approach this issue, the range theory, the range-frequency theory, and the adaptation-level theory are compared while manipulating the range and frequency of stimulus in a contextual set. This article comprises two studies that test the range effect and frequency effect. Study 1 examines the range effect on the attractiveness evaluated by subjects exposed to different ranges with the same number of stimuli in a context set. Study 2 examines the frequency effect on the attractiveness evaluated by subjects exposed to two context sets, each of which contains a different number of stimuli within identical ranges. In addition, we consider each prediction of subjective judgment using the range-frequency theory and the adaptation-level theory. The MANOVA results and the nonlinear regression model fittings of the two studies reveal that the adaptation-level theory provides a sufficiently good cognitive representation of a reference point Journal of Cognitive Science 20-1:111-145, 2019 ©2019 Institute for Cognitive Science, Seoul National University * Corresponding author 112 Sang Yun Seo, Seong Chan Jo, Hoon Young Lee when subjects are simultaneously exposed to a series of stimuli. Furthermore, the adaptation-level outperformed the range effect as regards a consumer’s cognitive representation when the range is fixed, but the frequency varies within the context set.","PeriodicalId":43246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Science","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17791/JCS.2019.20.1.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study intends to provide a better understanding of the cognitive representation of reference points, and how consumers formulate their reference levels in a judgment task. To approach this issue, the range theory, the range-frequency theory, and the adaptation-level theory are compared while manipulating the range and frequency of stimulus in a contextual set. This article comprises two studies that test the range effect and frequency effect. Study 1 examines the range effect on the attractiveness evaluated by subjects exposed to different ranges with the same number of stimuli in a context set. Study 2 examines the frequency effect on the attractiveness evaluated by subjects exposed to two context sets, each of which contains a different number of stimuli within identical ranges. In addition, we consider each prediction of subjective judgment using the range-frequency theory and the adaptation-level theory. The MANOVA results and the nonlinear regression model fittings of the two studies reveal that the adaptation-level theory provides a sufficiently good cognitive representation of a reference point Journal of Cognitive Science 20-1:111-145, 2019 ©2019 Institute for Cognitive Science, Seoul National University * Corresponding author 112 Sang Yun Seo, Seong Chan Jo, Hoon Young Lee when subjects are simultaneously exposed to a series of stimuli. Furthermore, the adaptation-level outperformed the range effect as regards a consumer’s cognitive representation when the range is fixed, but the frequency varies within the context set.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适应水平和距离频率对主观判断的影响
本研究旨在更好地了解参考点的认知表征,以及消费者如何在判断任务中形成他们的参考水平。为了解决这一问题,我们比较了范围理论、范围-频率理论和适应水平理论,同时在上下文集合中操纵刺激的范围和频率。本文包括两个研究,分别测试了距离效应和频率效应。研究1考察了在一个情境集中,受试者暴露在不同范围、相同数量的刺激下,对吸引力评估的范围效应。研究2考察了频率对受试者吸引力评估的影响,受试者暴露在两个环境集中,每个环境集包含相同范围内不同数量的刺激。此外,我们使用距离-频率理论和适应水平理论来考虑每个主观判断的预测。两项研究的MANOVA结果和非线性回归模型拟合表明,适应水平理论提供了足够好的认知表征参考点认知科学学报20-1:11 11-145,2019©2019首尔国立大学认知科学研究所*通讯作者112 Sang Yun Seo, Seong Chan Jo, Hoon Young Lee当受试者同时暴露于一系列刺激时。此外,对于消费者的认知表征,当范围固定时,适应水平优于范围效应,但在情境集中,频率会发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Cognitive Science is an official journal of the International Association for Cognitive Science (IACS, http://ia-cs.org) and published quarterly by the Institute for Cognitive Science at Seoul National University, located in Seoul, Korea. The Association currently consists of member societies of different countries such as Australia, China, Japan, Korea, and European Union. However, paper submission by anyone in the whole world is welcome at any time. Its main concern is to showcase research articles of highest quality and significance within the disciplines of cognitive science, including, but not limited to, philosophy, psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, neuroscience, aesthetics, anthropology, and education, insofar as it is deemed to be of interest to those who pursue the study of mind. In particular, we would like to encourage submissions that cross the traditional disciplinary boundaries. The Journal of Cognitive Science (JCS) is published quarterly on 31 March, 30 June, 30 September, 31 December (founded in 2000) as the official journal of International Association for Cognitive Science (IACS) by the Institute for Cognitive Science at Seoul National University. It is a SCOPUS, ESCI, EBSCO, KCI journal. It aims to publish research articles of the highest quality and significance within the disciplines that form cognitive science, including philosophy, psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, neuroscience, anthropology, and education for Interdisciplinary Journal. Submissions that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries in either themes or methods are especially encouraged. AI-associated Cognitive Science will be newly reinforced and papers in this area are encouraged to be submitted.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Case-marking on the Anticipatory Processing of Korean Sentences Code-switching Patterns of Educated and Non-educated Efik-English Bilinguals: A Descriptive Study Association and the Mechanisms of Priming Leveraging Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Grammar Teaching with Multimedia Animations Thoughts on Consciousness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1