Political party affiliation strength and protest participation propensity: theory and evidence from Africa

IF 2.5 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Social Movement Studies Pub Date : 2022-04-12 DOI:10.1080/14742837.2022.2061942
Joel Blaxland
{"title":"Political party affiliation strength and protest participation propensity: theory and evidence from Africa","authors":"Joel Blaxland","doi":"10.1080/14742837.2022.2061942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The confluence of political party polarization, interparty conflict, and contentious politics is nearly a universal axiom in Africa. Although the reasons for parties to protest and rally are many, pinpointing who actually participates is rather tricky. Building on previous literature regarding the influential power of political parties on member behaviour, this study proposes political party affiliation strength as metric for identifying whom within political parties is more and less likely to participate in in-person political protests and rallies. Using data on Kenya, Nigeria, and Tunisia, this study finds strong supporting evidence that party affiliation strength effects protest participation propensity mediated by party-government linkages. Those strongly affiliated to political parties that enjoy majority power in government are less likely to protest, and strong affiliates of non-majority power-holding parties are more likely to protest. Preliminary evidence presented here also demonstrates those with non-political party affiliation are significantly more likely to post online about political issues rather than participate in in-person contentious politics. This study’s findings help further bridge the gap between individual political psychology and macro-level political behaviour.","PeriodicalId":47507,"journal":{"name":"Social Movement Studies","volume":"73 1","pages":"549 - 566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Movement Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2061942","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT The confluence of political party polarization, interparty conflict, and contentious politics is nearly a universal axiom in Africa. Although the reasons for parties to protest and rally are many, pinpointing who actually participates is rather tricky. Building on previous literature regarding the influential power of political parties on member behaviour, this study proposes political party affiliation strength as metric for identifying whom within political parties is more and less likely to participate in in-person political protests and rallies. Using data on Kenya, Nigeria, and Tunisia, this study finds strong supporting evidence that party affiliation strength effects protest participation propensity mediated by party-government linkages. Those strongly affiliated to political parties that enjoy majority power in government are less likely to protest, and strong affiliates of non-majority power-holding parties are more likely to protest. Preliminary evidence presented here also demonstrates those with non-political party affiliation are significantly more likely to post online about political issues rather than participate in in-person contentious politics. This study’s findings help further bridge the gap between individual political psychology and macro-level political behaviour.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政党隶属度与抗议参与倾向:来自非洲的理论与证据
在非洲,政党极化、政党间冲突和有争议的政治几乎是一个普遍的公理。尽管各党派抗议和集会的原因有很多,但确定谁真正参与是相当棘手的。在先前关于政党对成员行为的影响力的文献的基础上,本研究提出政党隶属关系强度作为确定政党中谁更可能或更不可能参与面对面的政治抗议和集会的指标。利用肯尼亚、尼日利亚和突尼斯的数据,本研究发现了强有力的支持证据,表明政党隶属强度影响由党政关系中介的抗议参与倾向。那些与在政府中享有多数权力的政党关系密切的人不太可能抗议,而与非多数权力政党关系密切的人更有可能抗议。这里提出的初步证据还表明,那些与政党无关的人更有可能在网上发表政治问题,而不是亲自参与有争议的政治活动。本研究的发现有助于进一步弥合个人政治心理和宏观政治行为之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Achieving Organizationality Through Authorship Affordances — A Communicative Episode of Telegram Polling from 2019 Hong Kong If at first, you don’t succeed: Strategies used by environmental activist volunteer leaders to overcome failure PROFILE: Revisiting the social movement society in a time of datafication Action dilemmas in prefigurative politics: making prefiguration feasible in Sweden The future is now. An introduction to prefigurative politics The future is now. An introduction to prefigurative politics , edited by Lara Monticelli and published by Bristol, UK, Bristol University Press, 2022, 276 pp., £80.00 (hardback), £26.99 (paperback), ISBN: 978-1529215663
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1