Value creation in bundling utility mergers: A corporate focus anomaly

Richard Burns , Gayle Erwin , Frank Messina , Lance Nail
{"title":"Value creation in bundling utility mergers: A corporate focus anomaly","authors":"Richard Burns ,&nbsp;Gayle Erwin ,&nbsp;Frank Messina ,&nbsp;Lance Nail","doi":"10.1016/S1085-7443(99)80074-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent empirical studies have documented the significantly positive monotonic relationship between changes in corporate focus and firm value. Focus-decreasing activities such as diversifying mergers have been shown to diminish firm value while focus-increasing activities, including divestitures of unrelated assets, exhibit a value-enhancing effect. However, many of these studies follow the convention of excluding utilities as their regulated industry makes then incomparable to unregulated industries. Examining only utility mergers and acquisitions, this study finds that only those which occur between utilities operating in different primary lines of business (“bundling” mergers) experience significant increases in firm value. Consistent with other studies, conglomerate mergers lead to a substantial decrease in firm value. Horizontal and vertical mergers lead to insignificant wealth gains. These results present an anomaly to the corporate focus theory and indicate that the regulation of utilities creates value for related diversification - contrary to the monotonic relationship exhibited in unregulated industries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy Finance & Development","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 185-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1085-7443(99)80074-X","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy Finance & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S108574439980074X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Recent empirical studies have documented the significantly positive monotonic relationship between changes in corporate focus and firm value. Focus-decreasing activities such as diversifying mergers have been shown to diminish firm value while focus-increasing activities, including divestitures of unrelated assets, exhibit a value-enhancing effect. However, many of these studies follow the convention of excluding utilities as their regulated industry makes then incomparable to unregulated industries. Examining only utility mergers and acquisitions, this study finds that only those which occur between utilities operating in different primary lines of business (“bundling” mergers) experience significant increases in firm value. Consistent with other studies, conglomerate mergers lead to a substantial decrease in firm value. Horizontal and vertical mergers lead to insignificant wealth gains. These results present an anomaly to the corporate focus theory and indicate that the regulation of utilities creates value for related diversification - contrary to the monotonic relationship exhibited in unregulated industries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捆绑公用事业合并中的价值创造:企业焦点异常
最近的实证研究表明,企业焦点的变化与企业价值之间存在显著的正单调关系。减少焦点的活动,如多元化合并,已被证明会降低公司价值,而增加焦点的活动,包括剥离不相关资产,则表现出价值提升的效果。然而,这些研究中的许多都遵循了将公用事业排除在外的惯例,因为受监管的行业使其无法与不受监管的行业进行比较。本研究仅考察了公用事业公司的并购,发现只有那些发生在不同主要业务线的公用事业公司之间的并购(“捆绑”并购)才会显著增加公司价值。与其他研究一致,企业集团合并导致企业价值大幅下降。横向和纵向合并带来的财富增长微不足道。这些结果与公司焦点理论不同,表明对公用事业的监管为相关多元化创造了价值,这与不受监管的行业所表现出的单调关系相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Minimization of Energy Efficiency Barriers in the Context of Optimization of Management Decisions in the Process of Sustainable Development Household heterogeneity in valuation of heating energy costs ROLE OF BIG DATA IN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS FOR FINANCIAL FRAUD Porous CoP@RGO With Pseudocapacitance Characteristics for Lithium Ion Storage Factors Affecting Renters’ Electricity Use: More than Split Incentives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1