Energetic, Exergetic, Environmental, and Economic Assessment of a Cascade Refrigeration System Operating with Four Different Ecological Refrigerant Pairs
Cleison Henrique de Paula, W. M. Duarte, Thiago Torres Martins Rocha, Raphael Nunes de Oliveira, A. Maia
{"title":"Energetic, Exergetic, Environmental, and Economic Assessment of a Cascade Refrigeration System Operating with Four Different Ecological Refrigerant Pairs","authors":"Cleison Henrique de Paula, W. M. Duarte, Thiago Torres Martins Rocha, Raphael Nunes de Oliveira, A. Maia","doi":"10.1142/s2010132521500255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, a cascade refrigeration system operating with four different ecological refrigerant pairs was modeled. This system uses R744 (Carbon dioxide) in the low-temperature cycle and operates with R290 (propane), R1234yf (2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene), R152a (1,1-difluorethane), and R717 (ammonia) in the high-temperature cycle. Energetic, exergetic, environmental, and economic performance of the cascade system was investigated to determine the most appropriate ecological refrigerant couple. The parameters used in each mentioned performance were COP (Coefficient of Performance), [Formula: see text] (Exergy Efficiency), TEWI (Total Equivalent Warming Impact), ECOP (Ecological coefficient of performance), and [Formula: see text] (Total plant cost rate), respectively. The results showed that the cascade refrigeration system operating with R744/R717 provided the best performance for the thermodynamic conditions analyzed, presenting a COP of 2.10, [Formula: see text] of 56.9%, [Formula: see text] of 24 334 USD/year, ECOP of 4.86, and TEWI of 25.67 tons of CO2. Finally, evaluating the total plant cost rate of this cascade system, it was noted that the capital and maintenance cost rate [Formula: see text] corresponds to 89.1% of the [Formula: see text] value, the operational cost rate [Formula: see text] corresponds to 10.27% of the [Formula: see text] value and the environmental cost rate [Formula: see text] corresponds to 0.63% of [Formula: see text].","PeriodicalId":13757,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Air-conditioning and Refrigeration","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Air-conditioning and Refrigeration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010132521500255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
In this work, a cascade refrigeration system operating with four different ecological refrigerant pairs was modeled. This system uses R744 (Carbon dioxide) in the low-temperature cycle and operates with R290 (propane), R1234yf (2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene), R152a (1,1-difluorethane), and R717 (ammonia) in the high-temperature cycle. Energetic, exergetic, environmental, and economic performance of the cascade system was investigated to determine the most appropriate ecological refrigerant couple. The parameters used in each mentioned performance were COP (Coefficient of Performance), [Formula: see text] (Exergy Efficiency), TEWI (Total Equivalent Warming Impact), ECOP (Ecological coefficient of performance), and [Formula: see text] (Total plant cost rate), respectively. The results showed that the cascade refrigeration system operating with R744/R717 provided the best performance for the thermodynamic conditions analyzed, presenting a COP of 2.10, [Formula: see text] of 56.9%, [Formula: see text] of 24 334 USD/year, ECOP of 4.86, and TEWI of 25.67 tons of CO2. Finally, evaluating the total plant cost rate of this cascade system, it was noted that the capital and maintenance cost rate [Formula: see text] corresponds to 89.1% of the [Formula: see text] value, the operational cost rate [Formula: see text] corresponds to 10.27% of the [Formula: see text] value and the environmental cost rate [Formula: see text] corresponds to 0.63% of [Formula: see text].
期刊介绍:
As the only international journal in the field of air-conditioning and refrigeration in Asia, IJACR reports researches on the equipments for controlling indoor environment and cooling/refrigeration. It includes broad range of applications and underlying theories including fluid dynamics, thermodynamics, heat transfer, and nano/bio-related technologies. In addition, it covers future energy technologies, such as fuel cell, wind turbine, solar cell/heat, geothermal energy and etc.