{"title":"Global IR Research Programme: From Perplexities to Progressions","authors":"Deepshika Shahi̇","doi":"10.20991/allazimuth.1331851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our basic expectations vis-à-vis ‘the international’ have turned our phenomenal \nexistence into two seemingly irreconcilable cognitive prisons: ‘one world’ with \nhomogenizing propensities (dominated by the West) and ‘many worlds’ with \nheterogenizing predispositions (embodied by the non-West). Every so often, these \ncognitive prisons—oscillating between the extreme homogenizing propensities of \nthe West and heterogenizing predispositions of the non-West— become obstacles \nin implementing effective global partnerships that are required to tackle the \nchallenges thrown by global crisis-situations, e.g., the likelihoods of world \nwar, financial crisis, climate change, pandemic, and the like. The agenda of \nthe ‘Global IR research programme’ has emerged to demolish these cognitive \nprisons. To this end, this agenda finds rational support from multiple auxiliary \ntheories that derive stimulus from hitherto denigrated knowledge-forms thriving \nin different corners of the world: e.g., Tianxia (all-under-heaven) from China, \nAdvaita (non-duality) from India, and Mu No Basho (place of nothingness) from \nJapan. Nevertheless, the conditioned reflexes of many IR researchers compel \nthem to receive the emergent knowledge-forms by correlating their ‘source’ and \n‘scope’: generally, the knowledge-forms having their source in the West are \ngranted a global scope, whereas the knowledge-forms having their source in the \nnon-West are given a local scope; it is often suspected that the local non-Western \nknowledge-forms cannot grasp the larger global scenario. Philosophically, these \nconditioned reflexes emanate from Kantian dualism, which forms disconnected \nopposites of phenomena-noumena, science-metaphysics, West–non-West etc. This \narticle reveals how the Global IR research programme—inspired by the Chinese, \nIndian and Japanese cosmovisions—strives to demolish the cognitive prisons of \n‘one world versus many worlds’, thereby ensuring the prospective progressions \nof this research programme.","PeriodicalId":51976,"journal":{"name":"All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"All Azimuth-A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1331851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Our basic expectations vis-à-vis ‘the international’ have turned our phenomenal
existence into two seemingly irreconcilable cognitive prisons: ‘one world’ with
homogenizing propensities (dominated by the West) and ‘many worlds’ with
heterogenizing predispositions (embodied by the non-West). Every so often, these
cognitive prisons—oscillating between the extreme homogenizing propensities of
the West and heterogenizing predispositions of the non-West— become obstacles
in implementing effective global partnerships that are required to tackle the
challenges thrown by global crisis-situations, e.g., the likelihoods of world
war, financial crisis, climate change, pandemic, and the like. The agenda of
the ‘Global IR research programme’ has emerged to demolish these cognitive
prisons. To this end, this agenda finds rational support from multiple auxiliary
theories that derive stimulus from hitherto denigrated knowledge-forms thriving
in different corners of the world: e.g., Tianxia (all-under-heaven) from China,
Advaita (non-duality) from India, and Mu No Basho (place of nothingness) from
Japan. Nevertheless, the conditioned reflexes of many IR researchers compel
them to receive the emergent knowledge-forms by correlating their ‘source’ and
‘scope’: generally, the knowledge-forms having their source in the West are
granted a global scope, whereas the knowledge-forms having their source in the
non-West are given a local scope; it is often suspected that the local non-Western
knowledge-forms cannot grasp the larger global scenario. Philosophically, these
conditioned reflexes emanate from Kantian dualism, which forms disconnected
opposites of phenomena-noumena, science-metaphysics, West–non-West etc. This
article reveals how the Global IR research programme—inspired by the Chinese,
Indian and Japanese cosmovisions—strives to demolish the cognitive prisons of
‘one world versus many worlds’, thereby ensuring the prospective progressions
of this research programme.
期刊介绍:
All Azimuth is a bi-annual journal that provides a forum for academic studies on foreign policy analysis and peace research as well as theoretically-oriented policy pieces on international issues. We particularly welcome research on the nexus of peace, security, and development. We aim to publish pieces bridging the theory-practice gap; dealing with under-represented conceptual approaches in the field; and engaging in scholarly dialogue between the “center” and the “periphery”. We strongly encourage, therefore, publications with homegrown theoretical and philosophical approaches. In this sense, All Azimuth aims to transcend conventional theoretical, methodological, geographical, academic and cultural boundaries. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editor. If found suitable for further consideration, manuscripts will be assessed through double-blind peer-review by independent, anonymous experts. All Azimuth is published by the Center for Foreign Policy and Peace Research, a non-profit and nonpartisan organization dedicated to helping develop agendas and promote policies that contribute to the peaceful resolution of international and inter-communal conflicts taking place particularly in the regions surrounding Turkey.