Robustness analysis for the certification of digital controller implementations

J. L. Ny, George J. Pappas
{"title":"Robustness analysis for the certification of digital controller implementations","authors":"J. L. Ny, George J. Pappas","doi":"10.1145/1795194.1795209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite recent advances in the field of Networked Control Systems (NCS), the gap between the control design stage and the implementation stage on a physical platform remains significant. The simplifying assumptions made in the analysis of NCS are often not precise enough for realistic embedded control systems, and engineers must resort to time-consuming simulations and multiple redesign and testing phases before the performance of a system is judged adequate. Moreover, simulation-based methods do not typically provide rigorous performance or stability guarantees. We approach the problem of certifying a digital controller implementation from an input-output, robust control perspective. Following a standard method for analyzing sampled-data systems, we view the implementation step as a perturbation of a nominal linear time-invariant model. Nonlinearities and disturbances due to implementation effects are treated as uncertainty blocks and characterized via Integral Quadratic Constraints (IQCs), such as gain bounds. From our modeling discussion emerge some important types of uncertainties. We discuss some new gain bounds for one of them, namely an aperiodic sample-and-hold operator with uncertain sampling times. Two important features of the robust control approach are i) this approach is modular, i.e., the analysis of different uncertainty blocks can be done and refined separately, and the results combined in the study of a complete complex system; ii) the guarantees on the stability and performance of the implemented system can be obtained automatically via efficient computational tools.","PeriodicalId":6619,"journal":{"name":"2016 ACM/IEEE 7th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS)","volume":"59 1","pages":"99-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 ACM/IEEE 7th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1795194.1795209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Despite recent advances in the field of Networked Control Systems (NCS), the gap between the control design stage and the implementation stage on a physical platform remains significant. The simplifying assumptions made in the analysis of NCS are often not precise enough for realistic embedded control systems, and engineers must resort to time-consuming simulations and multiple redesign and testing phases before the performance of a system is judged adequate. Moreover, simulation-based methods do not typically provide rigorous performance or stability guarantees. We approach the problem of certifying a digital controller implementation from an input-output, robust control perspective. Following a standard method for analyzing sampled-data systems, we view the implementation step as a perturbation of a nominal linear time-invariant model. Nonlinearities and disturbances due to implementation effects are treated as uncertainty blocks and characterized via Integral Quadratic Constraints (IQCs), such as gain bounds. From our modeling discussion emerge some important types of uncertainties. We discuss some new gain bounds for one of them, namely an aperiodic sample-and-hold operator with uncertain sampling times. Two important features of the robust control approach are i) this approach is modular, i.e., the analysis of different uncertainty blocks can be done and refined separately, and the results combined in the study of a complete complex system; ii) the guarantees on the stability and performance of the implemented system can be obtained automatically via efficient computational tools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字控制器实现认证的鲁棒性分析
尽管网络控制系统(NCS)领域最近取得了进展,但在物理平台上的控制设计阶段和实施阶段之间的差距仍然很大。对于实际的嵌入式控制系统,NCS分析中所做的简化假设往往不够精确,工程师必须借助于耗时的模拟和多次重新设计和测试阶段,才能判断系统的性能是否足够。此外,基于仿真的方法通常不能提供严格的性能或稳定性保证。我们从输入输出、鲁棒控制的角度来处理验证数字控制器实现的问题。遵循分析采样数据系统的标准方法,我们将实现步骤视为标称线性时不变模型的扰动。非线性和由实现效应引起的干扰被视为不确定性块,并通过积分二次约束(iqc)(如增益边界)来表征。从我们的建模讨论中出现了一些重要类型的不确定性。我们讨论了其中一种具有不确定采样时间的非周期采样保持算子的增益边界。鲁棒控制方法的两个重要特点是:1)该方法是模块化的,即可以对不同的不确定性块进行分析和细化,并将结果结合在一个完整的复杂系统的研究中;Ii)所实施系统的稳定性和性能保证可以通过高效的计算工具自动获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ICCPS '21: ACM/IEEE 12th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, May 19-21, 2021 Demo Abstract: SURE: An Experimentation and Evaluation Testbed for CPS Security and Resilience Poster Abstract: Thermal Side-Channel Forensics in Additive Manufacturing Systems Exploiting Wireless Channel Randomness to Generate Keys for Automotive Cyber-Physical System Security WiP Abstract: Platform for Designing and Managing Resilient and Extensible CPS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1