Modeling and Automated Execution of Application Deployment Tests

Michael Wurster, Uwe Breitenbücher, Oliver Kopp, F. Leymann
{"title":"Modeling and Automated Execution of Application Deployment Tests","authors":"Michael Wurster, Uwe Breitenbücher, Oliver Kopp, F. Leymann","doi":"10.1109/EDOC.2018.00030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, many deployment systems have been developed that process deployment models to automatically provision applications. The main objective of these systems is to shorten delivery times and to ensure a proper execution of the deployment process. However, these systems mainly focus on the correct technical execution of the deployment, but do not check whether the deployed application is working properly. Especially in DevOps scenarios where applications are modified frequently, this can quickly lead to broken deployments, for example, if a wrong component version was specified in the deployment model that has not been adapted to a new database schema. Ironically, even hardly noticeable errors in deployment models quickly result in technically successful deployments, which do not work at all. In this paper, we tackle these issues. We present a modeling concept that enables developers to define deployment tests directly along with the deployment model. These tests are then automatically run by a runtime after deployment to verify that the application is working properly. To validate the technical feasibility of the approach, we applied the concept to TOSCA and extended an existing open source TOSCA runtime.","PeriodicalId":6544,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)","volume":"75 1","pages":"171-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 22nd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOC.2018.00030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

In recent years, many deployment systems have been developed that process deployment models to automatically provision applications. The main objective of these systems is to shorten delivery times and to ensure a proper execution of the deployment process. However, these systems mainly focus on the correct technical execution of the deployment, but do not check whether the deployed application is working properly. Especially in DevOps scenarios where applications are modified frequently, this can quickly lead to broken deployments, for example, if a wrong component version was specified in the deployment model that has not been adapted to a new database schema. Ironically, even hardly noticeable errors in deployment models quickly result in technically successful deployments, which do not work at all. In this paper, we tackle these issues. We present a modeling concept that enables developers to define deployment tests directly along with the deployment model. These tests are then automatically run by a runtime after deployment to verify that the application is working properly. To validate the technical feasibility of the approach, we applied the concept to TOSCA and extended an existing open source TOSCA runtime.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用程序部署测试的建模和自动执行
近年来,开发了许多处理部署模型以自动提供应用程序的部署系统。这些系统的主要目标是缩短交付时间,并确保部署过程的正确执行。但是,这些系统主要关注部署的正确技术执行,而不检查部署的应用程序是否正常工作。特别是在经常修改应用程序的DevOps场景中,这可能很快导致部署失败,例如,如果部署模型中指定了一个错误的组件版本,而该版本没有适应新的数据库模式。具有讽刺意味的是,即使部署模型中几乎不明显的错误也会很快导致技术上成功的部署,而这些部署根本不起作用。在本文中,我们解决了这些问题。我们提出了一个建模概念,使开发人员能够直接定义部署测试和部署模型。部署后,运行时将自动运行这些测试,以验证应用程序是否正常工作。为了验证该方法的技术可行性,我们将该概念应用于TOSCA,并扩展了现有的开源TOSCA运行时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MARTSIA: Enabling Data Confidentiality for Blockchain-based Process Execution A Multi-level Cyber-Security Reference Model in Support of Vulnerability Analysis Shape Your Process: Discovering Declarative Business Processes from Positive and Negative Traces Taking into Account User Preferences Semi-automated Test Migration for BPMN-Based Process-Driven Applications Interoperability of Digital Government Services: A Brazilian Reference Architecture Model to Promote Communication, Management, and Reuse of Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1