Comparing External Ventricular Drains-Related Ventriculitis Surveillance Definitions

Maria M Reyes, S. Munigala, Emily L Church, Tobias Kulik, S. Keyrouz, G. Zipfel, D. Warren
{"title":"Comparing External Ventricular Drains-Related Ventriculitis Surveillance Definitions","authors":"Maria M Reyes, S. Munigala, Emily L Church, Tobias Kulik, S. Keyrouz, G. Zipfel, D. Warren","doi":"10.1017/ice.2017.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE To evaluate the agreement between the current National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definition for ventriculitis and others found in the literature among patients with an external ventricular drain (EVD) DESIGN Retrospective cohort study from January 2009 to December 2014 SETTING Neurology and neurosurgery intensive care unit of a large tertiary-care center PATIENTS Patients with an EVD were included. Patients with an infection prior to EVD placement or a permanent ventricular shunt were excluded. METHODS We reviewed the charts of patients with positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures and/or abnormal CSF results while they had an EVD in place and applied various ventriculitis definitions. RESULTS We identified 48 patients with a total of 52 cases of ventriculitis (41 CSF culture-positive cases and 11 cases based on abnormal CSF test results) using the NHSN definition. The most common organisms causing ventriculitis were gram-positive commensals (79.2%); however, 45% showed growth of only 1 colony on 1 piece of media. Approximately 60% of the ventriculitis cases by the NHSN definition met the Honda criteria, approximately 56% met the Gozal criteria, and 23% met Citerio’s definition. Cases defined using Honda versus Gozal definitions had a moderate agreement (κ=0.528; P<.05) whereas comparisons of Honda versus Citerio definitions (κ=0.338; P<.05) and Citerio versus Gozal definitions (κ=0.384; P<.05) had only fair agreements. CONCLUSIONS The agreement between published ventriculostomy-associated infection (VAI) definitions in this cohort was moderate to fair. A VAI surveillance definition that better defines contaminants is needed for more homogenous application of surveillance definitions between institutions and better comparison of rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:574–579","PeriodicalId":13655,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology","volume":"16 1","pages":"574 - 579"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2017.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the agreement between the current National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definition for ventriculitis and others found in the literature among patients with an external ventricular drain (EVD) DESIGN Retrospective cohort study from January 2009 to December 2014 SETTING Neurology and neurosurgery intensive care unit of a large tertiary-care center PATIENTS Patients with an EVD were included. Patients with an infection prior to EVD placement or a permanent ventricular shunt were excluded. METHODS We reviewed the charts of patients with positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures and/or abnormal CSF results while they had an EVD in place and applied various ventriculitis definitions. RESULTS We identified 48 patients with a total of 52 cases of ventriculitis (41 CSF culture-positive cases and 11 cases based on abnormal CSF test results) using the NHSN definition. The most common organisms causing ventriculitis were gram-positive commensals (79.2%); however, 45% showed growth of only 1 colony on 1 piece of media. Approximately 60% of the ventriculitis cases by the NHSN definition met the Honda criteria, approximately 56% met the Gozal criteria, and 23% met Citerio’s definition. Cases defined using Honda versus Gozal definitions had a moderate agreement (κ=0.528; P<.05) whereas comparisons of Honda versus Citerio definitions (κ=0.338; P<.05) and Citerio versus Gozal definitions (κ=0.384; P<.05) had only fair agreements. CONCLUSIONS The agreement between published ventriculostomy-associated infection (VAI) definitions in this cohort was moderate to fair. A VAI surveillance definition that better defines contaminants is needed for more homogenous application of surveillance definitions between institutions and better comparison of rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:574–579
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较室外引流相关脑室炎监测定义
目的评估当前国家医疗安全网络(NHSN)对脑室炎的定义与文献中其他脑室外引流(EVD)患者定义的一致性。设计2009年1月至2014年12月的回顾性队列研究背景:某大型三级医疗中心神经病学和神经外科重症监护室纳入EVD患者。排除EVD植入前感染或永久性心室分流的患者。方法我们回顾了脑脊液(CSF)培养阳性和/或CSF结果异常的患者的图表,而他们有EVD,并应用各种脑室炎的定义。结果根据NHSN的定义,我们鉴定了48例共52例脑室炎患者(41例脑脊液培养阳性,11例脑脊液检测结果异常)。引起脑室炎最常见的微生物是革兰氏阳性共生菌(79.2%);然而,45%的人在1块培养基上只生长了1个菌落。NHSN定义的脑室炎病例中,约60%符合Honda标准,约56%符合goal标准,23%符合Citerio标准。使用Honda和goal定义的病例具有中等一致性(κ=0.528;P< 0.05),而本田与Citerio定义的比较(κ=0.338;P< 0.05)和Citerio vs . goal定义(κ=0.384;P< 0.05)只有公平协议。结论:在该队列中公布的脑室造口相关感染(VAI)定义之间的一致性是中等到公平的。需要一个更好地定义污染物的VAI监测定义,以便在各机构之间更加统一地应用监测定义并更好地比较比率。中华流行病学杂志,2017;38:574-579
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ICE volume 39 issue 7 Cover and Front matter ICE volume 39 issue 7 Cover and Back matter ICE volume 39 issue 6 Cover and Front matter ICE volume 39 issue 6 Cover and Back matter ICE volume 39 issue 5 Cover and Back matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1