Assessment of Family Functioning amongst Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis in Nigeria: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study

A. Yerima, R. Akintayo, A. Akpabio, H. Olaosebikan, C. Uhunmwangho
{"title":"Assessment of Family Functioning amongst Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis in Nigeria: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"A. Yerima, R. Akintayo, A. Akpabio, H. Olaosebikan, C. Uhunmwangho","doi":"10.31173/BOMJ.BOMJ_149_16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability and reduced quality of life. The disability associated with OA depends on the cultural and socioeconomic context. Therefore, the role of family in the management of OA cannot be over emphasized. Objective: To determine the levels of family functioning and the predictors of poor family functioning amongst patients with knee OA. Method: A multicentre cross-sectional study involving 250 adults satisfying the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) clinical criteria for Knee OA were recruited over a period of 3 months after approval by the Ethical Review Committee of each of the study centres. Interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to obtained relevant demographic and clinical information. Family functioning was assessed using Family APGAR (Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve) questionnaire. Other variables assessed were pain, functional class, Sleep Quality, depression and radiographs. Analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21. Binary logistic regression was used to determine predictors of family functioning. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The mean age was 59.9±10.62 and 209 (83.6%) were females. One hundred and ninety-nine (79.6%) reported a highly functional family, 40 (16.0%) and 11 (4.4%) had moderate and severely dysfunctional family respectively. APGAR scores were significantly associated with ethnicity (p=0.007) and functional class (p=0.020) and depression (p=0.013) and was best predicted by ethnicity (p=0.018, OR-1.360, CI [1.054 – 1.754]. Conclusion: Patients with knee OA seen in this study have a good level of family support. Ethnicity was the best predictor of dysfunctional family.","PeriodicalId":9110,"journal":{"name":"BORNO MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BORNO MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31173/BOMJ.BOMJ_149_16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability and reduced quality of life. The disability associated with OA depends on the cultural and socioeconomic context. Therefore, the role of family in the management of OA cannot be over emphasized. Objective: To determine the levels of family functioning and the predictors of poor family functioning amongst patients with knee OA. Method: A multicentre cross-sectional study involving 250 adults satisfying the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) clinical criteria for Knee OA were recruited over a period of 3 months after approval by the Ethical Review Committee of each of the study centres. Interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to obtained relevant demographic and clinical information. Family functioning was assessed using Family APGAR (Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve) questionnaire. Other variables assessed were pain, functional class, Sleep Quality, depression and radiographs. Analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21. Binary logistic regression was used to determine predictors of family functioning. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The mean age was 59.9±10.62 and 209 (83.6%) were females. One hundred and ninety-nine (79.6%) reported a highly functional family, 40 (16.0%) and 11 (4.4%) had moderate and severely dysfunctional family respectively. APGAR scores were significantly associated with ethnicity (p=0.007) and functional class (p=0.020) and depression (p=0.013) and was best predicted by ethnicity (p=0.018, OR-1.360, CI [1.054 – 1.754]. Conclusion: Patients with knee OA seen in this study have a good level of family support. Ethnicity was the best predictor of dysfunctional family.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚膝骨关节炎患者的家庭功能评估:一项多中心横断面研究
背景:骨关节炎(OA)是导致残疾和生活质量下降的主要原因。与OA相关的残疾取决于文化和社会经济背景。因此,家庭在OA管理中的作用再怎么强调也不为过。目的:确定膝关节炎患者的家庭功能水平和家庭功能不良的预测因素。方法:在每个研究中心的伦理审查委员会批准后,一项多中心横断面研究招募了250名满足美国风湿病学会(ACR)膝关节OA临床标准的成年人,为期3个月。采用访谈者填写的调查问卷获得相关的人口学和临床信息。采用家庭APGAR(适应、伙伴关系、成长、情感和决心)问卷评估家庭功能。评估的其他变量包括疼痛、功能等级、睡眠质量、抑郁和x光片。分析使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)版本21。采用二元逻辑回归确定家庭功能的预测因子。P值< 0.05为显著性。结果:平均年龄59.9±10.62岁,女性209例(83.6%)。高度功能失调家庭199例(79.6%),中度功能失调家庭40例(16.0%),重度功能失调家庭11例(4.4%)。APGAR评分与种族(p=0.007)、功能类别(p=0.020)和抑郁(p=0.013)显著相关,以种族为预测标准(p=0.018, or = 1.360, CI[1.054 - 1.754])。结论:本研究中发现的膝关节炎患者有良好的家庭支持水平。种族是家庭功能失调的最佳预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Right Ventricular Systolic Function Using Tissue Doppler-Derived Tricuspid Lateral Annular Systolic Velocity (S`) Among HIV Patients on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) And Its Relationship with CD4 Cell Count and Viral Load Spondylocostal Dysostosis: Mild variant in a Nigerian Newborn A Huge Submucosal Fibroid Polyps; A Hidden Cause of Necroturia Unusual sequelae of persistent digit sucking Habit Facial Hyperkeratosis/Hyperpigmentation Health Issues of Nigerian Muslim Pilgrims in The Immediate Post Covid-19 Era Hajj Year 2022 in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1