Parents as “stakeholders” and their conceptions of teaching excellence in English higher education

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Comparative Education and Development Pub Date : 2019-01-08 DOI:10.1108/IJCED-05-2018-0010
M. Wood, F. Su
{"title":"Parents as “stakeholders” and their conceptions of teaching excellence in English higher education","authors":"M. Wood, F. Su","doi":"10.1108/IJCED-05-2018-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to explore parents as “stakeholders” in higher education in England and how they perceive teaching excellence.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study adopted a qualitative research design using an interpretative approach through which the authors aimed to develop understandings of parents’ perspectives as higher education “stakeholders”. The empirical data were gathered via focus group interviews and an online survey with 24 participants in the UK.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study found that the majority of parents wished to be treated as an important stakeholder group in higher education. Parent participants perceived that teaching excellence could be evidenced through indicators and measures, for example, the design and delivery of the courses, progress measures, contact hours, speed of return of marked work, graduate employability and so on. They also saw value and significance in the students’ exposure to ideas and perspectives not previously experienced, in zeal and passion in the teaching, and in an academically nurturing, understanding and supportive pedagogical relationship between academic and student.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study uncovered some apparent tensions, contradictions and challenges for parents as stakeholders in higher education, for example, in reconciling the co-existence of their desire to be involved and engaged with scope for students to be formed as independent young adults. Parents’ desire to measure teaching excellence is also compounded by their concern that excellent teaching is thereby reduced to a box-ticking exercise. This study has implications for higher education institutions wishing to engage parents as a stakeholder group in a meaningful way.\n","PeriodicalId":51967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-05-2018-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore parents as “stakeholders” in higher education in England and how they perceive teaching excellence. Design/methodology/approach The study adopted a qualitative research design using an interpretative approach through which the authors aimed to develop understandings of parents’ perspectives as higher education “stakeholders”. The empirical data were gathered via focus group interviews and an online survey with 24 participants in the UK. Findings This study found that the majority of parents wished to be treated as an important stakeholder group in higher education. Parent participants perceived that teaching excellence could be evidenced through indicators and measures, for example, the design and delivery of the courses, progress measures, contact hours, speed of return of marked work, graduate employability and so on. They also saw value and significance in the students’ exposure to ideas and perspectives not previously experienced, in zeal and passion in the teaching, and in an academically nurturing, understanding and supportive pedagogical relationship between academic and student. Originality/value This study uncovered some apparent tensions, contradictions and challenges for parents as stakeholders in higher education, for example, in reconciling the co-existence of their desire to be involved and engaged with scope for students to be formed as independent young adults. Parents’ desire to measure teaching excellence is also compounded by their concern that excellent teaching is thereby reduced to a box-ticking exercise. This study has implications for higher education institutions wishing to engage parents as a stakeholder group in a meaningful way.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家长作为“利益相关者”及其在英语高等教育中的教学理念
本文的目的是探讨家长作为英国高等教育的“利益相关者”,以及他们如何看待卓越的教学。设计/方法/方法本研究采用定性研究设计,采用解释性方法,作者旨在通过该方法了解家长作为高等教育“利益相关者”的观点。实证数据是通过焦点小组访谈和对英国24名参与者的在线调查收集的。本研究发现,大多数家长希望在高等教育中被视为一个重要的利益相关者群体。家长们认为,优秀的教学可以通过指标和措施来证明,例如,课程的设计和交付、进度措施、接触时间、批阅作业的归还速度、毕业生的就业能力等等。他们还看到了学生接触到以前没有经历过的思想和观点的价值和意义,在教学中的热情和激情,以及在学术上的培养,理解和支持教师和学生之间的教学关系。创新/价值这项研究揭示了作为高等教育利益相关者的父母面临的一些明显的紧张、矛盾和挑战,例如,在调和他们希望参与和参与学生作为独立的年轻人形成的空间的共存方面。家长们想要衡量教学质量的愿望,也因为他们担心优秀的教学因此沦为一种打勾的练习。本研究对希望以有意义的方式吸引家长作为利益相关者群体的高等教育机构具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
A critical evaluation of the validity of socioeconomic measures used in PISA Envisioning quality education for sustainability transformation in teacher education: perspectives from an international dialogue on Sustainable Development Goal 4 Analysing the dropout patterns of individual children in Nepal: relationship between school dropout and grade repetition/entrance age Vedic mathematics for sustainable knowledge: a systematic literature review Education for sustainability as a way-out to nurture citizens: a reframing in policy practices of Chinese higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1