OR-045 Comparative Study on Physical Fitness in Female College Students between Different BFP Grades

Hui Wang, Chognlin Zhang, Xiaomin Ding, Shaosheng Liu
{"title":"OR-045 Comparative Study on Physical Fitness in Female College Students between Different BFP Grades","authors":"Hui Wang, Chognlin Zhang, Xiaomin Ding, Shaosheng Liu","doi":"10.14428/EBR.V1I2.9743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective  Through testing the body fat percentage (BFP) and physical fitness by laboratory methods in female college students, the relationship between physical fitness and body morphology of female college students was revealed.  \nMethods BFP and fat free mass were measured among 633 healthy female college students randomly selected. All subjects were divided into five groups by their BFP: low, normal, high body fat, grade I obesity and grade II/III obesity. Grip Strength, Leg Strength, Back Strength, Vital Capacity, Maximal Oxygen Uptake, Reaction Time, Sit And Reach, Back Scratch and Standing On One Foot With Closed Eyes were tested.  \nResults There were significant differences between all groups in Grip Strength, Back Strength, Vital Capacity, the absolute and relative value of VO2max, Back Scratch on both sides and Standing on One Foot with Closed Eyes. The difference in Grip Strength and Back Strength showed significantly (P < 0.05), and the others showed very significant difference (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in Resting Heart Rate, Reaction Time, Sit And Reach and Leg Strength. The results of multiple comparison showed that compared with 4 group,there were significant differences in Vital Capacity, relative value of Maximum Oxygen Uptake, Back Scratch in both sides in 2 group and 3 group. Moreover, compared with 5 group, there were significant differences in all the indicators in 2 group and 3 group. And there were significant differences in all the indicators except Back Strength and the relative value of Maximum Oxygen Uptake between 5 group and 4 group. \nConclusions The results showed that the physical fitness of female college students with normal BFP was significantly better than that of obese ones. The major influence of exceeding 30 percent in BFP was the cardiopulmonary endurance fitness and upper limb flexibility fitness. In the group of BFP higher than 35%, these influences were more significant, meanwhile, balance fitness declined.","PeriodicalId":12276,"journal":{"name":"Exercise Biochemistry Review","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exercise Biochemistry Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14428/EBR.V1I2.9743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective  Through testing the body fat percentage (BFP) and physical fitness by laboratory methods in female college students, the relationship between physical fitness and body morphology of female college students was revealed.  Methods BFP and fat free mass were measured among 633 healthy female college students randomly selected. All subjects were divided into five groups by their BFP: low, normal, high body fat, grade I obesity and grade II/III obesity. Grip Strength, Leg Strength, Back Strength, Vital Capacity, Maximal Oxygen Uptake, Reaction Time, Sit And Reach, Back Scratch and Standing On One Foot With Closed Eyes were tested.  Results There were significant differences between all groups in Grip Strength, Back Strength, Vital Capacity, the absolute and relative value of VO2max, Back Scratch on both sides and Standing on One Foot with Closed Eyes. The difference in Grip Strength and Back Strength showed significantly (P < 0.05), and the others showed very significant difference (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in Resting Heart Rate, Reaction Time, Sit And Reach and Leg Strength. The results of multiple comparison showed that compared with 4 group,there were significant differences in Vital Capacity, relative value of Maximum Oxygen Uptake, Back Scratch in both sides in 2 group and 3 group. Moreover, compared with 5 group, there were significant differences in all the indicators in 2 group and 3 group. And there were significant differences in all the indicators except Back Strength and the relative value of Maximum Oxygen Uptake between 5 group and 4 group. Conclusions The results showed that the physical fitness of female college students with normal BFP was significantly better than that of obese ones. The major influence of exceeding 30 percent in BFP was the cardiopulmonary endurance fitness and upper limb flexibility fitness. In the group of BFP higher than 35%, these influences were more significant, meanwhile, balance fitness declined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同BFP年级女大学生体质比较研究
目的通过对女大学生体脂率(BFP)和体质的实验室测定,揭示女大学生体质与身体形态的关系。方法随机抽取633名健康女大学生,测定BFP和无脂肪量。所有受试者按BFP分为5组:低体脂、正常体脂、高体脂、I级肥胖和II/III级肥胖。测试了握力、腿部力量、背部力量、肺活量、最大摄氧量、反应时间、坐姿和伸展、背部抓伤和闭着眼睛单脚站立。结果各组在握力、背部力量、肺活量、最大摄氧量绝对值和相对值、双侧背部抓痕、闭眼单脚站立等指标上差异均有统计学意义。握力、背力差异极显著(P < 0.05),其余差异极显著(P < 0.01)。在静息心率、反应时间、坐姿和伸展以及腿部力量方面没有显著差异。多重比较结果显示,与4组比较,2组和3组在肺活量、最大摄氧量相对值、两侧背部划痕等指标上均有显著差异。与5组比较,2组、3组各项指标均有显著差异。除背强度和最大摄氧量的相对值外,5组与4组在其他指标上均有显著差异。结论BFP正常的女大学生体质明显优于肥胖女大学生。BFP超过30%的主要影响因素是心肺耐力和上肢柔韧性。在BFP高于35%组,这些影响更为显著,平衡适合度下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Exercise on Gene Expression Exercise to Fight Disease Answers to Problems and Critical Thinking Questions Biochemical Assessment of Exercisers Iron Status
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1