The mental load in separated families

R. Luthra, Tina Haux
{"title":"The mental load in separated families","authors":"R. Luthra, Tina Haux","doi":"10.20377/jfr-743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This paper asks how evolving contact and gendered working lives, gendered identities, and conflict and parental relationships influence cognitive labour in separated families. \nBackground: The fact that the often-invisible work of planning, researching, and executing decisions concerning children and household maintenance is borne by women/mothers, receives growing research attention, yet, the bulk of this research focuses on the gendered division of the mental load in intact families. Given the high prevalence of separated families with high levels of father contact, more work is needed to understand how cognitive labour is divided by parents residing in separate households. \nMethod: This paper draws on 31 semi-structured interviews of separated parents, including 7 former couples. Interviews were sampled from a nationally representative longitudinal survey, Understanding Society, professionally transcribed and thematically analysed with Nvivo. \nResults: Analysing the interviews reveals both continuity and change in the division of the mental load following separation. For some families, gendered identities and working lives continue to justify an unequal division of the mental load, even when children spend large amounts of time solely with fathers. In others, conflict can reduce communication between parents, either increasing fathers cognitive labour through parallel parenting or decreasing it when fathers are excluded from decision-making altogether. Finally, separation can present a turning point where working lives and identities are re-evaluated, and the mental load can be negotiated anew. \nConclusion: We provide new evidence that the mental load remains gendered even among those practicing a relatively \"modern\" family form of shared care post-separation, while highlighting possibilities for variation and change.","PeriodicalId":44669,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrifte Fur Familienforschung-Journal of Family Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrifte Fur Familienforschung-Journal of Family Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: This paper asks how evolving contact and gendered working lives, gendered identities, and conflict and parental relationships influence cognitive labour in separated families. Background: The fact that the often-invisible work of planning, researching, and executing decisions concerning children and household maintenance is borne by women/mothers, receives growing research attention, yet, the bulk of this research focuses on the gendered division of the mental load in intact families. Given the high prevalence of separated families with high levels of father contact, more work is needed to understand how cognitive labour is divided by parents residing in separate households. Method: This paper draws on 31 semi-structured interviews of separated parents, including 7 former couples. Interviews were sampled from a nationally representative longitudinal survey, Understanding Society, professionally transcribed and thematically analysed with Nvivo. Results: Analysing the interviews reveals both continuity and change in the division of the mental load following separation. For some families, gendered identities and working lives continue to justify an unequal division of the mental load, even when children spend large amounts of time solely with fathers. In others, conflict can reduce communication between parents, either increasing fathers cognitive labour through parallel parenting or decreasing it when fathers are excluded from decision-making altogether. Finally, separation can present a turning point where working lives and identities are re-evaluated, and the mental load can be negotiated anew. Conclusion: We provide new evidence that the mental load remains gendered even among those practicing a relatively "modern" family form of shared care post-separation, while highlighting possibilities for variation and change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
离散家庭的精神负担
目的:探讨不断演变的接触和性别化的工作生活、性别认同、冲突和父母关系如何影响离散家庭的认知劳动。背景:关于儿童和家庭维持的计划、研究和执行决策的无形工作是由女性/母亲承担的,这一事实受到越来越多的研究关注,然而,本研究的大部分集中在完整家庭中心理负荷的性别划分上。考虑到父亲接触程度高的分离家庭非常普遍,需要做更多的工作来了解居住在分离家庭的父母如何分配认知劳动。方法:对31对离异父母进行半结构化访谈,其中包括7对离异夫妇。访谈样本来自全国代表性的纵向调查,了解社会,专业转录和Nvivo的主题分析。结果:对访谈进行分析,发现分离后心理负荷的划分既有连续性又有变化。对于一些家庭来说,性别认同和工作生活仍然证明了精神负担的不平等分配,即使孩子们花大量时间单独与父亲在一起。在其他情况下,冲突会减少父母之间的沟通,要么通过平行养育增加父亲的认知劳动,要么在父亲完全被排除在决策之外时减少父亲的认知劳动。最后,分离可能是一个转折点,工作生活和身份被重新评估,精神负担可以重新协商。结论:我们提供了新的证据,表明即使在那些实行相对“现代”家庭形式的分离后共同照顾的家庭中,心理负荷仍然是性别的,同时强调了变异和变化的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gender differences in the association between nonstandard work schedules and work-family conflict: A mixed methods analysis in France Transition to fatherhood and adjustments in working hours: The importance of organizational policy feedback Towards a conceptualisation of intensive parenting norms: Testing exact and approximate measurement invariance across social and country contexts Do partnership transitions affect individual perceptions of aging in later life? Findings from the German Ageing Survey and the NRW80+ study Arranging childcare in two Nordic countries: A comparison of ECEC start in Iceland and Sweden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1