Assessing Performance and Risk in Complex Supply Chains and Tying Performance Measures to Strategic Concepts

L. D. Smith, Anthony Vatterott, Wesley S. Boyce
{"title":"Assessing Performance and Risk in Complex Supply Chains and Tying Performance Measures to Strategic Concepts","authors":"L. D. Smith, Anthony Vatterott, Wesley S. Boyce","doi":"10.1080/16258312.2021.1964333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite the popular notion that ‘supply chains rather than individual firms compete’, an intensive review of supply-chain performance metrics proposed in published works reveals that most measures apply to individual supply-chain participants and relationships with specific supply-chain partners, rather than to the supply chain as a whole. Indicators of supply-chain risk (or stability) tend to have a broader view but are less developed and receive less attention by managers of supply-chain functions. Tying measures to strategic concepts helps to show interrelationships among strategic goals and the trade-offs that can occur as particular strategies are employed to improve supply-chain performance. We find that more research is needed on how to assess competitive dynamics and opportunism within supply chains and to assess the costs and risks associated with international business activity.","PeriodicalId":22004,"journal":{"name":"Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2021.1964333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite the popular notion that ‘supply chains rather than individual firms compete’, an intensive review of supply-chain performance metrics proposed in published works reveals that most measures apply to individual supply-chain participants and relationships with specific supply-chain partners, rather than to the supply chain as a whole. Indicators of supply-chain risk (or stability) tend to have a broader view but are less developed and receive less attention by managers of supply-chain functions. Tying measures to strategic concepts helps to show interrelationships among strategic goals and the trade-offs that can occur as particular strategies are employed to improve supply-chain performance. We find that more research is needed on how to assess competitive dynamics and opportunism within supply chains and to assess the costs and risks associated with international business activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估复杂供应链中的绩效和风险,并将绩效措施与战略概念联系起来
尽管“供应链而不是单个企业竞争”的概念很流行,但对已发表作品中提出的供应链绩效指标的深入审查表明,大多数措施适用于单个供应链参与者以及与特定供应链合作伙伴的关系,而不是整个供应链。供应链风险(或稳定性)的指标往往具有更广泛的视野,但发展较少,受到供应链职能管理者的关注较少。将度量与战略概念联系起来有助于显示战略目标之间的相互关系,以及在采用特定战略来改善供应链绩效时可能发生的权衡。我们发现,需要更多的研究来评估供应链中的竞争动态和机会主义,以及评估与国际商业活动相关的成本和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unlocking the potential of digital technologies for sustainable supply chain management strategies Sustainable supply chain management and CEO compensation: does CSR committee matter? Multi-retailer joint replenishment problem under different carbon regulation policies Variable neighbourhood search for parallel machine scheduling with a single loading server: a truck-scheduling perspective Role tensions in agricultural distribution in a mid-mountain area
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1