Encouraging Online Voter Registration of Nevada Physicians - A Challenge in Apathy?

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q3 LAW Journal of Legal Medicine Pub Date : 2021-05-21 DOI:10.1080/01947648.2021.1914492
S. Tun, H. Luong, W. Havins
{"title":"Encouraging Online Voter Registration of Nevada Physicians - A Challenge in Apathy?","authors":"S. Tun, H. Luong, W. Havins","doi":"10.1080/01947648.2021.1914492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Encouraging Online Voter Registration of Nevada Physicians A Challenge in Apathy? Sein Tun, MS, OMS-II; stun@student.touro.edu Hao Luong, MS, OMS-II; hluong2@student.touro.edu Weldon E Havins, MD, JD, LLM, FCLM, Emeritus Professor Touro University Nevada College of Osteopathic Medicine, Henderson, Nevada Voting is the most basic way a citizen can have his or her voice heard. It is also one of the easiest ways for an individual to participate in changing or maintaining the legislation. Voting registration and participation can allow citizens to have a direct impact on the healthcare system, which is an essential aspect of policy making within the United States’ political system. Physicians are the most equipped with knowledge about the healthcare system, therefore, there is a need to increase voting amongst physician populations. Physicians’ votes and influence on health policy impact not only the medical community but their patients as well. To improve the healthcare system for both physicians and their patients, the candidates chosen to become legislators must align with the views held by their constituents. As registered voters and constituents of an Assemblyperson and a Senator, physicians can actively voice their concerns and ideas that could potentially contribute to new and improved legislation. However, the first and most important step in getting involved is to register to vote. When compared to other higher education professionals such as lawyers, physicians are less active in politics. This needs to be improved because healthcare policy contributes to a large portion of political discussion. In order to promote physician engagement in politics, there must be promotion of registration to vote. One benefit is that it is especially easy to register now because it can be done conveniently online. This study aims to improve physician voter registration outcomes by identifying physicians in Clark County who are not registered voters and contacting them to discuss the importance of voting and how to register online. However, because of limited information available from the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) and the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners (NBOME) databases, the only feasible method of contact to physicians is through mailing physical letters to their work offices. The method utilized in this study is not effective because it lacked sufficient time to allow the letters to be received by physicians before the data was 2021 American College of Legal Medicine JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE 2021, VOL. 41, NO. S1, 47–48 https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2021.1914492 analyzed. Although this study could not prove that mailing letters to the physicians’ office of practice is an adequate method, it did show that approximately 74% of physicians in Clark County are registered voters, which is of higher percentage than the general population of Nevada. Nonetheless, this number does not account for other variables that may influence lack of voter participation amongst physicians such as time constraints due to work commitments. Recommendation for modifications to future studies are included in order to refine the methods used. In spite of the lack of significant results, this research is intended to stimulate physician voter registration and there is hope that at the very least, the sent letters have increased physician awareness and inspire them to register to vote and participate in future elections. References available upon request. 48 ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":44014,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2021.1914492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Encouraging Online Voter Registration of Nevada Physicians A Challenge in Apathy? Sein Tun, MS, OMS-II; stun@student.touro.edu Hao Luong, MS, OMS-II; hluong2@student.touro.edu Weldon E Havins, MD, JD, LLM, FCLM, Emeritus Professor Touro University Nevada College of Osteopathic Medicine, Henderson, Nevada Voting is the most basic way a citizen can have his or her voice heard. It is also one of the easiest ways for an individual to participate in changing or maintaining the legislation. Voting registration and participation can allow citizens to have a direct impact on the healthcare system, which is an essential aspect of policy making within the United States’ political system. Physicians are the most equipped with knowledge about the healthcare system, therefore, there is a need to increase voting amongst physician populations. Physicians’ votes and influence on health policy impact not only the medical community but their patients as well. To improve the healthcare system for both physicians and their patients, the candidates chosen to become legislators must align with the views held by their constituents. As registered voters and constituents of an Assemblyperson and a Senator, physicians can actively voice their concerns and ideas that could potentially contribute to new and improved legislation. However, the first and most important step in getting involved is to register to vote. When compared to other higher education professionals such as lawyers, physicians are less active in politics. This needs to be improved because healthcare policy contributes to a large portion of political discussion. In order to promote physician engagement in politics, there must be promotion of registration to vote. One benefit is that it is especially easy to register now because it can be done conveniently online. This study aims to improve physician voter registration outcomes by identifying physicians in Clark County who are not registered voters and contacting them to discuss the importance of voting and how to register online. However, because of limited information available from the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) and the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners (NBOME) databases, the only feasible method of contact to physicians is through mailing physical letters to their work offices. The method utilized in this study is not effective because it lacked sufficient time to allow the letters to be received by physicians before the data was 2021 American College of Legal Medicine JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE 2021, VOL. 41, NO. S1, 47–48 https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2021.1914492 analyzed. Although this study could not prove that mailing letters to the physicians’ office of practice is an adequate method, it did show that approximately 74% of physicians in Clark County are registered voters, which is of higher percentage than the general population of Nevada. Nonetheless, this number does not account for other variables that may influence lack of voter participation amongst physicians such as time constraints due to work commitments. Recommendation for modifications to future studies are included in order to refine the methods used. In spite of the lack of significant results, this research is intended to stimulate physician voter registration and there is hope that at the very least, the sent letters have increased physician awareness and inspire them to register to vote and participate in future elections. References available upon request. 48 ABSTRACT
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼓励内华达州医生在线选民登记——对冷漠的挑战?
鼓励内华达州医生在线选民登记是对冷漠的挑战?吴登敦,MS, OMS-II;stun@student.touro.edu梁浩,MS, OMS-II;hluong2@student.touro.edu Weldon E hains, MD, JD, LLM, FCLM,内华达州亨德森市图罗大学内华达骨科医学院名誉教授投票是公民表达自己声音的最基本方式。这也是个人参与修改或维护立法的最简单的方法之一。投票登记和参与可以让公民对医疗保健系统产生直接影响,这是美国政治体系内政策制定的一个重要方面。医生是最了解医疗保健系统的人,因此,有必要增加医生群体的投票。医生的投票和对卫生政策的影响不仅影响医学界,也影响他们的病人。为了改善医生和病人的医疗保健系统,被选为议员的候选人必须与选民的观点保持一致。作为国会议员和参议员的注册选民和选民,医生可以积极地表达他们的关注和想法,这可能有助于新的和改进的立法。然而,参与投票的第一步也是最重要的一步是登记投票。与律师等其他受过高等教育的专业人士相比,医生在政治上的活跃程度较低。这需要得到改善,因为医疗保健政策在政治讨论中占据了很大一部分。为了促进医生参与政治,必须促进注册投票。一个好处是,现在特别容易注册,因为它可以方便地在网上完成。本研究旨在通过识别克拉克县未登记选民的医生,并与他们联系,讨论投票的重要性以及如何在线注册,从而改善医生选民注册的结果。然而,由于国家医学检查委员会(NBME)和国家骨科医学检查委员会(NBOME)数据库提供的信息有限,与医生联系的唯一可行方法是通过邮寄实物信件到他们的办公室。本研究中使用的方法是无效的,因为它没有足够的时间让医生在数据为2021年之前收到信件。美国法律医学学院法律医学杂志2021年,VOL. 41, NO。S1, 47-48 https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2021.1914492分析。虽然这项研究不能证明给医生的执业办公室邮寄信件是一种适当的方法,但它确实表明,克拉克县大约74%的医生是注册选民,这比内华达州的一般人口比例要高。然而,这一数字没有考虑到可能影响医生缺乏选民参与的其他变量,例如由于工作承诺而造成的时间限制。为了改进所使用的方法,还包括对未来研究的修改建议。尽管缺乏显著的结果,这项研究的目的是刺激医生选民登记,并希望至少,发送的信件提高了医生的意识,并激励他们注册投票和参与未来的选举。参考资料可根据要求提供。48文摘
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: The Journal of Legal Medicine is the official quarterly publication of the American College of Legal Medicine (ACLM). Incorporated in 1960, the ACLM has among its objectives the fostering and encouragement of research and study in the field of legal medicine. The Journal of Legal Medicine is internationally circulated and includes articles and commentaries on topics of interest in legal medicine, health law and policy, professional liability, hospital law, food and drug law, medical legal research and education, the history of legal medicine, and a broad range of other related topics. Book review essays, featuring leading contributions to the field, are included in each issue.
期刊最新文献
The Problem with Using Medical Boards to Regulate Misinformation 2022-2023 Southern Illinois University National Health Law Moot Court Competition. 2022-2023 Southern Illinois University National Health Law Moot Court Competition: Winning Brief. Fitness to Drive: It is Time for Evidence-Based Consensus and Italian Guidelines for Medical Driving Assessment. Who Decides? State Bans on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors in Tension with Parental Rights and Equal Protection Under the Law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1