Using the Gaucher Earlier Diagnosis Consensus (GED-C) Delphi Score in a Real-World Dataset

S. Revel-Vilk, G. Chodick, V. Shalev, Roni Lotan, K. Zarakowska, N. Gadir
{"title":"Using the Gaucher Earlier Diagnosis Consensus (GED-C) Delphi Score in a Real-World Dataset","authors":"S. Revel-Vilk, G. Chodick, V. Shalev, Roni Lotan, K. Zarakowska, N. Gadir","doi":"10.3390/ijtm2030037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early and accurate diagnosis of Gaucher disease, a rare, autosomal recessive condition characterized by hepatosplenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, is essential to facilitate earlier decision-making and prevent unnecessary tests and procedures. However, diagnosis can be challenging for non-specialists, owing to a wide variability in age, severity of disease, and types of clinical manifestation. The Gaucher Earlier Diagnosis Consensus (GED-C) scoring system was developed by a panel of 22 expert physicians using Delphi methodology on the signs and covariables considered important for diagnosing Gaucher disease. This study aimed to use the scoring system in a real-world dataset. We applied the GED-C scoring system to 265 confirmed cases of Gaucher disease identified in the Maccabi Health Services (MHS) database from 1998 to 2022. Overall Delphi scores were calculated using features applicable to type 1 Gaucher disease. Based on all available patient data up to one year after diagnosis, the median (interquartile range (IQR)) Delphi score was 8.0 (5.5–11.5), with patients reporting up to 15 variables each. A score of 9.5 (6.5–12.5) was determined for 205 patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2022. The overall GED-C score was highly dependent on the extraction of all relevant data. The number of features collected in the MHS database was fewer than those required to achieve a high score on the GED-C score.","PeriodicalId":43005,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Translational Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtm2030037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early and accurate diagnosis of Gaucher disease, a rare, autosomal recessive condition characterized by hepatosplenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, is essential to facilitate earlier decision-making and prevent unnecessary tests and procedures. However, diagnosis can be challenging for non-specialists, owing to a wide variability in age, severity of disease, and types of clinical manifestation. The Gaucher Earlier Diagnosis Consensus (GED-C) scoring system was developed by a panel of 22 expert physicians using Delphi methodology on the signs and covariables considered important for diagnosing Gaucher disease. This study aimed to use the scoring system in a real-world dataset. We applied the GED-C scoring system to 265 confirmed cases of Gaucher disease identified in the Maccabi Health Services (MHS) database from 1998 to 2022. Overall Delphi scores were calculated using features applicable to type 1 Gaucher disease. Based on all available patient data up to one year after diagnosis, the median (interquartile range (IQR)) Delphi score was 8.0 (5.5–11.5), with patients reporting up to 15 variables each. A score of 9.5 (6.5–12.5) was determined for 205 patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2022. The overall GED-C score was highly dependent on the extraction of all relevant data. The number of features collected in the MHS database was fewer than those required to achieve a high score on the GED-C score.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用戈歇早期诊断共识(GED-C)德尔福评分在一个真实世界的数据集
戈谢病是一种罕见的常染色体隐性遗传病,以肝脾肿大、血小板减少和贫血为特征,早期准确诊断戈谢病对于促进早期决策和防止不必要的检查和程序至关重要。然而,由于年龄、疾病严重程度和临床表现类型的广泛差异,诊断对非专业人员来说可能具有挑战性。戈谢病早期诊断共识(GED-C)评分系统由22名专家医师组成的小组使用德尔菲法对诊断戈谢病的重要标志和协变量进行了开发。这项研究的目的是在真实世界的数据集中使用评分系统。我们将GED-C评分系统应用于1998年至2022年在马卡比卫生服务(MHS)数据库中确定的265例戈谢病确诊病例。采用适用于1型戈歇病的特征计算总体德尔菲评分。根据诊断后一年的所有可用患者数据,德尔菲评分中位数(四分位间距(IQR))为8.0(5.5-11.5),每位患者报告多达15个变量。2000年至2022年诊断的205例患者的评分为9.5(6.5-12.5)。总的GED-C分数高度依赖于所有相关数据的提取。MHS数据库中收集的特征数量少于获得GED-C高分所需的特征数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International Translational Medicine
Journal of International Translational Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
317
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of International Translational Medicine (JITM, ISSN 2227-6394), founded in 2012, is an English academic journal published by Journal of International Translational Medicine Co., Ltd and sponsored by International Fderation of Translational Medicine. JITM is an open access journal freely serving to submit, review, publish, read and download full text and quote. JITM is a quarterly publication with the first issue published in March, 2013, and all articles published in English are compiled and edited by professional graphic designers according to the international compiling and editing standard. All members of the JITM Editorial Board are the famous international specialists in the field of translational medicine who come from twenty different countries and areas such as USA, Britain, France, Germany and so on.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Prognostic and Predictive Roles of Ki-67 in Endometrial Cancer A Review Concerning the Use of Etravirine and Darunavir in Translational Medicine Common Variable Immunodeficiency and Selective IgA Deficiency: Focus on Autoimmune Manifestations and Their Pathogenesis Primary Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma of the Parotid Gland in 32-Year-Old Male, a Case Report Mentha longifolia L. Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Cell Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis via Caspase Regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1