Validity and Reliability of the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score Translated into Arabic

Hanna Sager Samir, Khaja Aliaa Fareed, Bouhamrah Ahmed Khaled, Maqdes Ali
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score Translated into Arabic","authors":"Hanna Sager Samir, Khaja Aliaa Fareed, Bouhamrah Ahmed Khaled, Maqdes Ali","doi":"10.23937/2572-3243.1510082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Oxford Shoulder Instability Score, abbre-viated OSIS, is a brief, outcome measure self-reported by the patient suffering shoulder instability. Objectives: Our objective was to translate OSIS into Arabic and validate its psychometric properties via test of the reliability, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, and validity. Material & Methods: Fifty-five patients were involved in this survey at the baseline and follow-up (14 days after the baseline). We performed the internal consistency test using Cronbach’s α. We calculated Standard Response Mean (SRM) and Pearson’s Correlation to estimate the construct validity and responsiveness of the Arabic OSIS in comparison to Disability of the Arm and Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score. Results: The Arabic OSIS had a baseline Cronbach’s α of 0.815 and a follow-up value of 0.860. In addition, Intra-class correlation (ICC) of 0.897; (0.813-0.942) indicated high reliability. Arabic versions of OSIS had a strong correlation with DASH score (r = 0.77, p = 0.003) which suggested a good construct validity. Also, moderately correlated changes of baseline to follow-up in OSIS indicated moderate responsiveness. We did not observe any relevant floor and ceiling effect among the responses. Conclusion: Overall, the Arabic version of OSIS proved to be a good and reliable diagnostic tool for patients with shoulder instability.","PeriodicalId":16374,"journal":{"name":"Journal of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of musculoskeletal disorders and treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2572-3243.1510082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Oxford Shoulder Instability Score, abbre-viated OSIS, is a brief, outcome measure self-reported by the patient suffering shoulder instability. Objectives: Our objective was to translate OSIS into Arabic and validate its psychometric properties via test of the reliability, internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, and validity. Material & Methods: Fifty-five patients were involved in this survey at the baseline and follow-up (14 days after the baseline). We performed the internal consistency test using Cronbach’s α. We calculated Standard Response Mean (SRM) and Pearson’s Correlation to estimate the construct validity and responsiveness of the Arabic OSIS in comparison to Disability of the Arm and Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score. Results: The Arabic OSIS had a baseline Cronbach’s α of 0.815 and a follow-up value of 0.860. In addition, Intra-class correlation (ICC) of 0.897; (0.813-0.942) indicated high reliability. Arabic versions of OSIS had a strong correlation with DASH score (r = 0.77, p = 0.003) which suggested a good construct validity. Also, moderately correlated changes of baseline to follow-up in OSIS indicated moderate responsiveness. We did not observe any relevant floor and ceiling effect among the responses. Conclusion: Overall, the Arabic version of OSIS proved to be a good and reliable diagnostic tool for patients with shoulder instability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牛津肩部不稳定性评分翻译成阿拉伯语的效度与信度
背景:牛津肩关节不稳定评分,简称OSIS,是一种由肩关节不稳定患者自我报告的简短结果测量方法。目的:我们的目标是将OSIS翻译成阿拉伯语,并通过信度、内部一致性、地板和天花板效应和效度的测试来验证其心理测量特性。材料与方法:55例患者在基线和随访(基线后14天)时参与了本次调查。采用Cronbach’s α进行内部一致性检验。我们计算标准反应均值(SRM)和Pearson’s Correlation来估计阿拉伯语OSIS与手臂、肩膀和手的残疾(DASH)评分相比的结构效度和反应性。结果:阿拉伯OSIS患者的基线Cronbach’s α为0.815,随访值为0.860。此外,类内相关系数(ICC)为0.897;(0.813-0.942)为高信度。阿拉伯文版OSIS与DASH评分有较强的相关性(r = 0.77, p = 0.003),具有较好的结构效度。此外,在OSIS中,基线到随访的中度相关变化表明中度反应性。我们没有观察到任何相关的下限和上限效应。结论:总的来说,阿拉伯版本的sis被证明是肩关节不稳定患者良好可靠的诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Estrogen on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Structure and Function: A Systematic Review The Effect of Estrogen on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Structure and Function: A Systematic Review Neglected Radiocarpal Dislocations: Descriptive Note on Five Cases in Black Africa An Intervention Program Based on Motor Coordination Principles Improves Knee Alignment in Pre-Professional Ballet Dancers Non-Invasive Biomechanical Intervention Leads to Low Rates of Total Knee Replacement and Reduced Utilization of Healthcare Resources among Older Adults with Chronic Knee Pain: A 5-Year Follow-Up Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1