Self-criticisms toward a socially responsible science in the field of management

IF 3.8 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Brq-Business Research Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-12-10 DOI:10.1177/23409444211062230
Jesús de Frutos-Belizón, Fernando Martín‐Alcázar, Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey
{"title":"Self-criticisms toward a socially responsible science in the field of management","authors":"Jesús de Frutos-Belizón, Fernando Martín‐Alcázar, Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey","doi":"10.1177/23409444211062230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Management scholarship should be placed in a unique position to develop relevant scientific knowledge because business and management organizations are deeply involved in most global challenges. However, different critical voices have recently been raised in essays and editorials, and reports have questioned research in the management field, identifying multiple deficiencies that can limit the growth of a relatively young field. Based on an analysis of published criticisms of management research, we would like to shed light on the current state of management research and identify some limitations that should be considered and should guide the growth of this field of knowledge. This work offers guidance on the main problems of the discipline that should be addressed to encourage the transformation of management research to meet both scientific rigor and social relevance. The article ends with a discussion and a call to action for directing research toward the possibility and necessity of reinforcing “responsible research” in the management field. JEL CLASSIFICATION: M00, M10","PeriodicalId":46891,"journal":{"name":"Brq-Business Research Quarterly","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brq-Business Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444211062230","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Management scholarship should be placed in a unique position to develop relevant scientific knowledge because business and management organizations are deeply involved in most global challenges. However, different critical voices have recently been raised in essays and editorials, and reports have questioned research in the management field, identifying multiple deficiencies that can limit the growth of a relatively young field. Based on an analysis of published criticisms of management research, we would like to shed light on the current state of management research and identify some limitations that should be considered and should guide the growth of this field of knowledge. This work offers guidance on the main problems of the discipline that should be addressed to encourage the transformation of management research to meet both scientific rigor and social relevance. The article ends with a discussion and a call to action for directing research toward the possibility and necessity of reinforcing “responsible research” in the management field. JEL CLASSIFICATION: M00, M10
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理领域对社会负责的科学的自我批评
管理学术应该被置于一个独特的位置,以发展相关的科学知识,因为商业和管理组织深深参与到大多数全球性挑战中。然而,最近在文章和社论中出现了不同的批评声音,报告对管理领域的研究提出了质疑,指出了多种缺陷,这些缺陷可能会限制这个相对年轻的领域的发展。基于对已发表的管理研究批评的分析,我们希望阐明管理研究的现状,并确定应该考虑的一些限制,并指导这一知识领域的发展。这项工作为该学科的主要问题提供了指导,这些问题应该得到解决,以鼓励管理研究的转变,以满足科学严谨性和社会相关性。文章最后讨论并呼吁在管理领域加强“负责任研究”的可能性和必要性。凝胶分类:m00、m10
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Strategic supplier performance in a competitive landscape: Enhancing organizational performance through lean supply chain management Leading a post-pandemic workforce: Understanding employees’ changing work ethic How to improve quality investing Uncertainty’s impact on adaptive performance in the post-COVID era: The moderating role of perceived leader’s effectiveness Strategy-making: The use and misuse of artifacts to achieve common understanding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1