Study on Existing Husbandry Management Practices of Cattle Rearing in Selected Areas of Bangladesh

Md. Ruhul Amin, M. Kabir, S. Hossain, G. Deb, S. Amanullah, F. Afroz
{"title":"Study on Existing Husbandry Management Practices of Cattle Rearing in Selected Areas of Bangladesh","authors":"Md. Ruhul Amin, M. Kabir, S. Hossain, G. Deb, S. Amanullah, F. Afroz","doi":"10.11648/J.IJAE.20200506.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was executed to explore the present husbandry management practices of cattle rearing in selected areas of Bangladesh. A total 719 of samples were selected using simple random sampling technique from 14 selected upazilas of 9 districts. Data were collected through well-developed, pre-tested objective-based questionnaire and on-farm face to face direct interview. Data were analyzed using MS Excel and SPSS 20 software with descriptive statistics. From the study it was found that farmers were used half grazing (39.97%), full grazing (33.63%) and stall feeding (26.40%) cattle rearing systems. Most of the cattle sheds were found shabby type (47.89%). The average time of grazing and taking care of cattle were found 6.08 and 5.25 hours/day respectively. However, in intensive system straw and concentrate feed (8.04% and 14.94%) and in semi-intensive system grass and concentrate (5.67% and 7.47%) were provided. Most of the farmers (52.02%) used chopped roughage followed by balance ration (9.64%) of feeding technology. Moreover, most of the farmers irrespective of areas used wheat bran (65.07%) and rice police (49.92%) to feed their cattle. The scenarios of fodder cultivation of different study areas were found poor. Furthermore, the farmers had taken animal quarantine (24.19%), used cleaning farm premises (90.26%) and controlled rodents and external parasite (52.26%). Irrespective of areas regular cleaning, de-worming, vaccination, disinfect and did not take any kind of measure were 88.52%, 67.61%, 63.37%, 17.44% and 11.72% respectively. It may be concluded that there was a lack of knowledge found about scientific management practices in rearing cattle and scope for improvement of management practices of cattle for better milk and meat production in the context of Bangladesh.","PeriodicalId":53319,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics","volume":"361 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJAE.20200506.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The study was executed to explore the present husbandry management practices of cattle rearing in selected areas of Bangladesh. A total 719 of samples were selected using simple random sampling technique from 14 selected upazilas of 9 districts. Data were collected through well-developed, pre-tested objective-based questionnaire and on-farm face to face direct interview. Data were analyzed using MS Excel and SPSS 20 software with descriptive statistics. From the study it was found that farmers were used half grazing (39.97%), full grazing (33.63%) and stall feeding (26.40%) cattle rearing systems. Most of the cattle sheds were found shabby type (47.89%). The average time of grazing and taking care of cattle were found 6.08 and 5.25 hours/day respectively. However, in intensive system straw and concentrate feed (8.04% and 14.94%) and in semi-intensive system grass and concentrate (5.67% and 7.47%) were provided. Most of the farmers (52.02%) used chopped roughage followed by balance ration (9.64%) of feeding technology. Moreover, most of the farmers irrespective of areas used wheat bran (65.07%) and rice police (49.92%) to feed their cattle. The scenarios of fodder cultivation of different study areas were found poor. Furthermore, the farmers had taken animal quarantine (24.19%), used cleaning farm premises (90.26%) and controlled rodents and external parasite (52.26%). Irrespective of areas regular cleaning, de-worming, vaccination, disinfect and did not take any kind of measure were 88.52%, 67.61%, 63.37%, 17.44% and 11.72% respectively. It may be concluded that there was a lack of knowledge found about scientific management practices in rearing cattle and scope for improvement of management practices of cattle for better milk and meat production in the context of Bangladesh.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孟加拉国选定地区现有畜牧业饲养管理实践研究
进行这项研究是为了探索孟加拉国选定地区目前的养牛畜牧业管理做法。采用简单随机抽样方法,从9个区14个村抽取719份样本。数据通过精心设计的、预先测试的客观调查问卷和农场面对面的直接访谈收集。数据分析采用MS Excel和SPSS 20软件进行描述性统计。研究发现,农民采用半放牧(39.97%)、全放牧(33.63%)和圈养(26.40%)的养牛制度。以破旧型牛棚居多(47.89%)。放牧和照看牛的平均时间分别为6.08和5.25小时/天。精耕细作饲喂秸秆和精料饲料(8.04%和14.94%),半精耕细作饲喂牧草和精料饲料(5.67%和7.47%)。饲养技术中以粗饲料为主(52.02%),其次为平衡日粮(9.64%)。此外,无论在哪个地区,大多数农民都使用麦麸(65.07%)和大米(49.92%)来喂牛。不同研究区的饲料种植前景均较差。采取动物检疫(24.19%)、清理养殖场(90.26%)、控制鼠害和外源寄生虫(52.26%)。各区域定期清洁、除虫、接种疫苗、消毒和未采取任何措施的比例分别为88.52%、67.61%、63.37%、17.44%和11.72%。可以得出的结论是,在孟加拉国的情况下,缺乏关于养牛的科学管理做法的知识,也缺乏改进牛的管理做法以提高牛奶和肉类生产的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the Factors Influencing the Irish Potato Producers’ Market Channel Choice in Rwanda: A Case of Study Musanze District Assessments of Coffee Seedlings and Seed Production Challenges and Opportunity in Jimma Zone South West Ethiopia Effect of Women Empowerment in Agriculture on Household Food Security Index in Benin The Effect of Climate Change on Wheat and Maize Crops in Egypt Lender Behavioural Characteristics Affecting Agribusiness Loans Default Rate in Agricultural Finance Corporation, Mount Kenya Region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1