Hérodiens, Nabatéens et Lagides dans le Ḥawrān au Ier s. av. J.-C. : réflexions autour du sanctuaire de Ba‘alšamīn de Sī‘ (Syrie du Sud)

IF 1.3 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2007-01-01 DOI:10.3406/TOPOI.2007.2238

L. Tholbecq

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Cet article est l’occasion de discuter plusieurs inscriptions grecques et nabateennes impliquant des membres d’une meme famille dans la construction du temple de Baalshamīn de Sīa (Syrie du sud). Un stemma familial nouveau est propose, de meme qu’une nouvelle interpretation des termes arameens et grecs introduits dans le lexique nabateen en CIS II 163. Le contexte politique de la redaction du texte (2/1 av. J.-C. - Philippe le tetrarque) et du debut des travaux sur le sanctuaire (33/32 av. J.-C - Herode 1er) y est approfondi. Les arguments reunis ici permettent de defendre l’hypothese d’une cession d’une partie du Haurān a Cleopâtre entre 37/34 et 31 av. J.-C.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Hérodiens Nabatéens Lagides并在Ḥawr sān在公元av。公元前。反思:神社周围的Sīal - amšīn Ba‘‘南方(叙利亚)

本条的讨论是几个希腊铭文和nabateennes涉及同一个家庭的成员在寺庙的修建BaalshamīSīn a(叙利亚南部)。提出了一个新的家族stemma，以及在CIS II 163中引入的亚拉姆语和希腊语术语的新解释。起草文本的政治背景(公元前2/1年)-腓力四世)和圣所的开始工作(公元前33/32年-希律王一世)在这里得到了更详细的阐述。论点在这里开会,不允许利用剥离的部分Haurān . Cleopâtre 37/34 av。公元前31之间。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

7.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Topoi''s main assumption is that philosophy is a lively, provocative, delightful activity, which constantly challenges our received views, relentlessly questions our inherited habits, painstakingly elaborates on how things could be different, in other stories, in counterfactual situations, in alternative possible worlds. Whatever its ideology, whether with the intent of uncovering a truer structure of reality or of soothing our anxiety, of exposing myths or of following them through, the outcome of philosophical activity is always the destabilizing, unsettling generation of doubts, of objections, of criticisms. It follows that this activity is intrinsically a ''dialogue'', that philosophy is first and foremost philosophical discussion, that it requires bringing out conflicting points of view, paying careful, sympathetic attention to their structure, and using this dialectic to articulate one''s approach, to make it richer, more thoughtful, more open to variation and play. And it follows that the spirit which one brings to this activity must be one of tolerance, of always suspecting one''s own blindness and consequently looking with unbiased eye in every corner, without fearing to pass a (fallible) judgment on what is there but also without failing to show interest and respect. Topoi''s structure is a direct expression of this view. To maximize discussion, we devote most or all of this issue to a single topic. And, since discussion is only interesting when it is conducted seriously and responsibly, we usually request the collaboration of a guest-editor, an expert who will identify contributors and interact with them in a constructive way. Because we do not feel tied to any definite philosophical theme (or set of them), we choose the topic with absolute freedom, looking for what is blossoming and thriving, occasionally betting on what might - partly through our attention - ''begin'' to blossom and thrive. And because we do not want our structur e to become our own straightjacket, we are open to contributions not fitting the ''topos'', and do not rule out in principle the possibility of topic-less issues.

期刊最新文献

Virtuous Collective Attention. Being a Direct Realist – Searle, McDowell, and Travis on ‘seeing things as they are’ More on Williams on Ethical Knowledge and Reflection Virtue Ethics and the Morality System Having a Cake and Eating It Too? Direct Realism and Objective Identity in Descartes