Dental sequelae of pediatric maxillofacial trauma

S. Naran, Liliana Camison, B. Lam, Osama Basri, Lindsay A. Schuster, Brian S. Martin, J. Losee
{"title":"Dental sequelae of pediatric maxillofacial trauma","authors":"S. Naran, Liliana Camison, B. Lam, Osama Basri, Lindsay A. Schuster, Brian S. Martin, J. Losee","doi":"10.4103/JPD.JPD_2_18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Our goal was to explore dental complications in the pediatric population following facial trauma and identify those at risk. Patients and Methods: We queried children with fractures of tooth-supporting regions presenting from 2000 to 2014. Data elements included demographics, treatment method, and dental outcome measures. Results: A total of 117 subjects were identified. The average age at injury was 10.41 years, and average follow-up was 2.9 years. Fractures were grouped as mandibular (62.39%), maxillary (22.22%), or combination (15.39%). Dentition at time of injury was classified as primary (17.95%), mixed (38.46%), or permanent (43.59%). Conservative management was employed in 41.88%, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in 49.57%, and closed reduction and external fixation in 8.55%. The majority (67.52%) did not experience any dental trauma or sequela. Dental avulsion (10.26%), subluxation (10.26%), dysgenesis (5.13%), and development of a crossbite (5.13%), openbite (3.42%), and occlusal cant (0.85%) were observed. Avulsion was more likely in subjects requiring ORIF (P < 0.05). Development of an openbite, crossbite, or occlusal cant was more likely in subjects requiring ORIF or with combination fractures (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Fracture severity, treatment method, and dental age are all strong predictors for adverse dental complications. Treating specialists should be cognizant of the increase in risk of complication in these patients.","PeriodicalId":16711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"5 1","pages":"50 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JPD.JPD_2_18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Our goal was to explore dental complications in the pediatric population following facial trauma and identify those at risk. Patients and Methods: We queried children with fractures of tooth-supporting regions presenting from 2000 to 2014. Data elements included demographics, treatment method, and dental outcome measures. Results: A total of 117 subjects were identified. The average age at injury was 10.41 years, and average follow-up was 2.9 years. Fractures were grouped as mandibular (62.39%), maxillary (22.22%), or combination (15.39%). Dentition at time of injury was classified as primary (17.95%), mixed (38.46%), or permanent (43.59%). Conservative management was employed in 41.88%, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in 49.57%, and closed reduction and external fixation in 8.55%. The majority (67.52%) did not experience any dental trauma or sequela. Dental avulsion (10.26%), subluxation (10.26%), dysgenesis (5.13%), and development of a crossbite (5.13%), openbite (3.42%), and occlusal cant (0.85%) were observed. Avulsion was more likely in subjects requiring ORIF (P < 0.05). Development of an openbite, crossbite, or occlusal cant was more likely in subjects requiring ORIF or with combination fractures (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Fracture severity, treatment method, and dental age are all strong predictors for adverse dental complications. Treating specialists should be cognizant of the increase in risk of complication in these patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿颌面外伤的牙齿后遗症
目的:我们的目的是探讨儿童面部外伤后的牙齿并发症,并确定那些有危险的人群。患者与方法:对2000 ~ 2014年发生牙支撑区骨折的患儿进行调查。数据元素包括人口统计、治疗方法和牙科结果测量。结果:共鉴定出117名受试者。平均受伤年龄10.41岁,平均随访2.9年。骨折分为下颌骨骨折(62.39%)、上颌骨折(22.22%)和合并骨折(15.39%)。损伤时牙列分为原发性(17.95%)、混合性(38.46%)和永久性(43.59%)。保守治疗占41.88%,切开复位内固定(ORIF)占49.57%,闭合复位外固定占8.55%。大多数患者(67.52%)没有任何牙外伤或后遗症。其中,脱牙(10.26%)、半脱位(10.26%)、发育不良(5.13%)、形成交叉咬合(5.13%)、开放咬合(3.42%)、咬合不全(0.85%)。需要ORIF的受试者更容易发生撕脱(P < 0.05)。在需要ORIF或合并骨折的受试者中,更有可能发生开放咬合、交叉咬合或咬合不良(P < 0.05)。结论:骨折严重程度、治疗方法和牙龄都是牙并发症的重要预测因素。治疗专家应该认识到这些患者并发症风险的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Geographic Information System Marks a Revolutionary Change in Dental Sciences Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: "Wake Up Before It’s Too Late" Reviewing Nutritional Status in Children with Severe Early Childhood Caries Fragment Reattachment of Immature Permanent Incisors: Clinical Procedures and the Development of an Algorithm Filippi Syndrome: A Lesser Reported Craniodigital Syndrome with Unique Features
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1