Law & Ordo: Exploring What Lessons Ordoliberalism Holds for African Competition Law Regimes

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW World Competition Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.54648/woco2019023
Tjarda van der Vijver
{"title":"Law & Ordo: Exploring What Lessons Ordoliberalism Holds for African Competition Law Regimes","authors":"Tjarda van der Vijver","doi":"10.54648/woco2019023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For many years, it was believed that trade liberalization would address the lack of competition that many African economies suffer from. Recent insights seem to have falsified that belief. Many of those economies still suffer from a lack of competition and a prevalence of monopoly behaviour, often (enabled) by the State. So if trade liberalization did not do the trick, what other recipes are available? This article focuses on the added value that more rigorous competition law enforcement could bring, and seeks to derive insights from Ordoliberalism. Although often overlooked in recent years, it is submitted that the comprehensive conceptual framework of Ordoliberalism could provide tangible suggestions to strengthen competition in African economies. It provides a theoretical basis for introducing vigorous competition law enforcement, putting the competition rules in the centre of economic policy-making. It affords great weight to the consistency of economic policies and strongly cautions against any undue government influence, both through the enactment an ‘economic constitution’. It also provides scope provides analytical tools how to deal with the interaction between market power and vested interests. This article concludes that Ordoliberalism does in fact have various insights that could be helpful for spurring competition in Africa.","PeriodicalId":43861,"journal":{"name":"World Competition","volume":"189 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Competition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/woco2019023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For many years, it was believed that trade liberalization would address the lack of competition that many African economies suffer from. Recent insights seem to have falsified that belief. Many of those economies still suffer from a lack of competition and a prevalence of monopoly behaviour, often (enabled) by the State. So if trade liberalization did not do the trick, what other recipes are available? This article focuses on the added value that more rigorous competition law enforcement could bring, and seeks to derive insights from Ordoliberalism. Although often overlooked in recent years, it is submitted that the comprehensive conceptual framework of Ordoliberalism could provide tangible suggestions to strengthen competition in African economies. It provides a theoretical basis for introducing vigorous competition law enforcement, putting the competition rules in the centre of economic policy-making. It affords great weight to the consistency of economic policies and strongly cautions against any undue government influence, both through the enactment an ‘economic constitution’. It also provides scope provides analytical tools how to deal with the interaction between market power and vested interests. This article concludes that Ordoliberalism does in fact have various insights that could be helpful for spurring competition in Africa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律与奥多:探索奥多自由主义对非洲竞争法制度的启示
多年来,人们认为贸易自由化将解决许多非洲经济体所遭受的缺乏竞争的问题。最近的见解似乎推翻了这种信念。其中许多经济体仍然缺乏竞争和普遍存在垄断行为,而垄断行为往往是由国家(促成)的。那么,如果贸易自由化没有奏效,还有什么其他可行的方法呢?本文关注更严格的竞争执法可能带来的附加价值,并寻求从秩序自由主义中获得见解。虽然近年来经常被忽视,但有人认为,非洲自由主义的全面概念框架可以为加强非洲经济的竞争提供切实的建议。它为引入有力的竞争执法,将竞争规则置于经济政策制定的中心,提供了理论基础。它非常重视经济政策的一致性,并通过制定“经济宪法”强烈警告政府不要施加任何不当影响。它也提供了范围提供了分析工具如何处理市场力量和既得利益之间的相互作用。这篇文章的结论是,秩序自由主义实际上有各种各样的见解,可能有助于刺激非洲的竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
The Decriminalization of Cartel Activity in Kuwait: A Regulatory Framework Collective or Collusive Agreements? World Competition Book Review: Regulation 1/2003 and EU Antitrust Enforcement: A Systematic Guide Kris Dekeyser, Céline Gauer, Johannes Laitenberger, Nils Wahl, Wouter Wils & Luca Prete (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer 2023) Big Data Requests: The Commission’s Powers to Collect Documents in Investigations Under Articles 101 and 102 TFEU
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1