An evaluation of community pharmacists' perception of e-cigarette: An English cross-sectional survey with geospatial analysis.

Ravina Barrett, Louise Vythelingum
{"title":"An evaluation of community pharmacists' perception of e-cigarette: An English cross-sectional survey with geospatial analysis.","authors":"Ravina Barrett, Louise Vythelingum","doi":"10.5920/bjpharm.857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We wanted to establish prevalence of e-cigarette sale via Englishcommunity pharmacies. A cross-sectional survey of 500 retail-pharmacies was completed.Seventeen out of the 66respondents sold e-cigarettes, indicating a sales-prevalence of 25.76%. NRTwas widely available for sale (n=16, 94.1%), cessation services were lessfrequently available (n=7, 41.2%), or not available (n=9, 52.9%). ‘Dailysmokers’ were likely to use e-cigarette (n=8, 47.1%). Accessories were sold to0-2 people (n=13, 76.5%), χ² p=2.454 x 10-4. Young women purchasede-cigarettes (n=4, 23.5%), p=0.049, which were placed on top of the counter (n=7,41.2%), reflecting ‘impulse sales’ strategy. NRT was available forself-selection (n=14, 82.4%) (p=0.004), however staff-assistance was required(n=12, 70.6%), posing barriers. Costs for e-cigarette (£10.99-£29.99) versusNRT (£4.25-£35.99) represents value for money. Labelling and packaging werefound to be attractive, p=0.049, fashionable, colourful p=0.049, healthy,potentially breaching laws. All respondents provided NRT counselling, p<1x10-8.Less than half (n=8, 47.1%) provide e-cigarette’s counselling, while a majority(n=9, 52.9%) did not. Eight respondents describe 22 flavours, providing goodmouth feel. Aggregate ‘deprived’ versus ‘affluent’ analysis revels interestinginsights. We find some support of non-smokers initiating use. Pharmacists help patientsbut have limited support. We make recommendations to improve practice.","PeriodicalId":9253,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pharmacy","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5920/bjpharm.857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We wanted to establish prevalence of e-cigarette sale via Englishcommunity pharmacies. A cross-sectional survey of 500 retail-pharmacies was completed.Seventeen out of the 66respondents sold e-cigarettes, indicating a sales-prevalence of 25.76%. NRTwas widely available for sale (n=16, 94.1%), cessation services were lessfrequently available (n=7, 41.2%), or not available (n=9, 52.9%). ‘Dailysmokers’ were likely to use e-cigarette (n=8, 47.1%). Accessories were sold to0-2 people (n=13, 76.5%), χ² p=2.454 x 10-4. Young women purchasede-cigarettes (n=4, 23.5%), p=0.049, which were placed on top of the counter (n=7,41.2%), reflecting ‘impulse sales’ strategy. NRT was available forself-selection (n=14, 82.4%) (p=0.004), however staff-assistance was required(n=12, 70.6%), posing barriers. Costs for e-cigarette (£10.99-£29.99) versusNRT (£4.25-£35.99) represents value for money. Labelling and packaging werefound to be attractive, p=0.049, fashionable, colourful p=0.049, healthy,potentially breaching laws. All respondents provided NRT counselling, p<1x10-8.Less than half (n=8, 47.1%) provide e-cigarette’s counselling, while a majority(n=9, 52.9%) did not. Eight respondents describe 22 flavours, providing goodmouth feel. Aggregate ‘deprived’ versus ‘affluent’ analysis revels interestinginsights. We find some support of non-smokers initiating use. Pharmacists help patientsbut have limited support. We make recommendations to improve practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区药剂师对电子烟认知的评估:一项带有地理空间分析的英文横断面调查。
我们希望通过英国社区药店确定电子烟销售的流行程度。对500家零售药店进行了横断面调查。66名受访者中有17人销售电子烟,销售普及率为25.76%。nrt广泛销售(n=16, 94.1%),戒烟服务较少(n=7, 41.2%),或不提供(n=9, 52.9%)。“每日吸烟者”更可能使用电子烟(n=8, 47.1%)。配件共出售给2人(n=13, 76.5%), χ²p=2.454 x 10-4。年轻女性购买香烟(n=4, 23.5%), p=0.049,香烟被放在柜台上方(n=7,41.2%),这反映了“冲动销售”策略。NRT可用于自我选择(n=14, 82.4%) (p=0.004),但需要工作人员协助(n=12, 70.6%),这构成了障碍。电子烟(10.99英镑- 29.99英镑)和香烟(4.25英镑- 35.99英镑)的价格体现了物有所值。标签和包装被认为具有吸引力(p=0.049)、时尚、色彩丰富(p=0.049)、健康、潜在违法。所有应答者均提供NRT辅导,p<1x10-8。不到一半(n=8, 47.1%)提供电子烟咨询,而大多数(n=9, 52.9%)没有提供。8位受访者描述了22种口味,口感很好。“贫困”与“富裕”的综合分析揭示了有趣的见解。我们发现一些支持非吸烟者开始使用。药剂师帮助病人,但支持有限。我们提出了改进实践的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Law: A Review of Selected Pharmaceutical Patents Litigated in the UK Courts during 2022 Ensuring Pharmaceutical Product Success through Excipient QbD Efforts Solubility Enhancement for Dietheyldithiocarbamate-Zinc for Lung Cancer Treatment Impact of Critical Material Attributes of HPMC on the Release of Gliclazide from Hydrophilic Matrix Tablets Comparative Evaluation of the Disintegrant Properties of Starches from Three Cultivars of Dioscorea rotundata (Poir)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1