Islamic financial system and conventional banking: A comparison

Asma Salman , Huma Nawaz
{"title":"Islamic financial system and conventional banking: A comparison","authors":"Asma Salman ,&nbsp;Huma Nawaz","doi":"10.1016/j.aebj.2018.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study is conducted to find out the difference between the two areas of banking, that is, Islamic and conventional banking with respect to profitability, efficiency and liquidity. The secondary data from banks of each banking sector is taken for assessment. Ratio analysis and one sample <em>t</em>-test is applied to determine the characteristics of study respondents and regression analysis is applied to examine the difference in term of significant factors that influence customer trust of Islamic banks and commercial banks. The results of the study oppose many previous findings as the analysis shows that there is significant difference between the both types of banking for the variables under study. Moreover, influence of return on asset is more on customer trust for the study period (2013–2017) for the Islamic bank as compared to the conventional banking. The study also examines the significant factors that are important for growth of Islamic banking.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100115,"journal":{"name":"Arab Economic and Business Journal","volume":"13 2","pages":"Pages 155-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aebj.2018.09.003","citationCount":"79","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Economic and Business Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214462518300410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 79

Abstract

The present study is conducted to find out the difference between the two areas of banking, that is, Islamic and conventional banking with respect to profitability, efficiency and liquidity. The secondary data from banks of each banking sector is taken for assessment. Ratio analysis and one sample t-test is applied to determine the characteristics of study respondents and regression analysis is applied to examine the difference in term of significant factors that influence customer trust of Islamic banks and commercial banks. The results of the study oppose many previous findings as the analysis shows that there is significant difference between the both types of banking for the variables under study. Moreover, influence of return on asset is more on customer trust for the study period (2013–2017) for the Islamic bank as compared to the conventional banking. The study also examines the significant factors that are important for growth of Islamic banking.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊斯兰金融体系与传统银行:比较
本研究的目的是找出银行业务的两个领域之间的差异,即伊斯兰银行和传统银行在盈利能力、效率和流动性方面的差异。选取各银行部门的二次数据进行评估。采用比率分析和单样本t检验确定研究对象的特征,采用回归分析检验影响伊斯兰银行和商业银行客户信任的显著因素的差异。该研究的结果与之前的许多研究结果相反,因为分析表明,在研究的变量中,两种类型的银行之间存在显著差异。此外,在研究期间(2013-2017年),与传统银行相比,伊斯兰银行的资产回报率对客户信任的影响更大。该研究还考察了对伊斯兰银行业发展至关重要的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Unemployment, Income Inequality, Inflation Rate, and Political Stability on Poverty: An Empirical Study of Nepal Factors Affecting Adoption Of Cooking Gas In Ilorin Metropolis, Nigeria Motivation in entrepreneurship: a guarantee of entrepreneurial success Modeling Per Capita Income and its Dependence on Literacy Rate Human capital development and industrial sector growth in Sub Saharan African countries. An augmented pooled mean group estimator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1