Convection Ignition of Live Forest Fuels

S. McAllister, M. Finney
{"title":"Convection Ignition of Live Forest Fuels","authors":"S. McAllister, M. Finney","doi":"10.3801/iafss.fss.11-1312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wildland fires are an extremely costly and deadly problem. Crown fires, where live foliage ignites and burns, are particularly unpredictable – in part because live fuel ignition and combustion is poorly understood. Many wildland fire models assume radiation is the controlling heat transfer mechanism. However, there is a growing indication that radiation is insufficient to ignite the small, thin fuel particles that carry a wildland fire and that convective heating and flame bathing is a critical component. Unfortunately, ignition by convection heating of any fuel is poorly understood. Ignition of live forest fuels by any means is also completely unknown due to complicated moisture content and fuel chemistry considerations. To gain some insight into the wildland fire problem, an apparatus was built using two 6.5 kW electrical heaters to heat gas (air, nitrogen, etc.) over a range of temperatures from ambient up to 1200°C. The flow rate of these “airtorches” is adjustable. This apparatus was used to convectively ignite a range of both live and dead forest fuels. Fuels from all over the United States where used including Southern California, Utah, Florida, and Montana. To examine ignition threshold conditions and to have distinguishable differences in ignition times, air temperatures of 500°C and 600°C were used. The airflow rate varied slightly from 1.3 m/s to 1.4 m/s due to the density difference. Because live forest fuels contain large amounts of water, the evolution of both water and carbon dioxide was measured with time using a differential gas analyzer. Flaming ignition was seen for all dead fuels at 500°C, but the live fuels mostly showed glowing ignition. At 600°C, all fuels showed flaming ignition within 1-26 sec. Interestingly, all live fuels were still actively releasing water at ignition, implying there are steep temperature gradients within these physically thin fuels (i.e. not thermally thin). Simple heat transfer analysis in conjunction with the water evolution information was used to help explain the differences in ignition times due to fuel geometry.","PeriodicalId":12145,"journal":{"name":"Fire Safety Science","volume":"68 1","pages":"1312-1325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3801/iafss.fss.11-1312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Wildland fires are an extremely costly and deadly problem. Crown fires, where live foliage ignites and burns, are particularly unpredictable – in part because live fuel ignition and combustion is poorly understood. Many wildland fire models assume radiation is the controlling heat transfer mechanism. However, there is a growing indication that radiation is insufficient to ignite the small, thin fuel particles that carry a wildland fire and that convective heating and flame bathing is a critical component. Unfortunately, ignition by convection heating of any fuel is poorly understood. Ignition of live forest fuels by any means is also completely unknown due to complicated moisture content and fuel chemistry considerations. To gain some insight into the wildland fire problem, an apparatus was built using two 6.5 kW electrical heaters to heat gas (air, nitrogen, etc.) over a range of temperatures from ambient up to 1200°C. The flow rate of these “airtorches” is adjustable. This apparatus was used to convectively ignite a range of both live and dead forest fuels. Fuels from all over the United States where used including Southern California, Utah, Florida, and Montana. To examine ignition threshold conditions and to have distinguishable differences in ignition times, air temperatures of 500°C and 600°C were used. The airflow rate varied slightly from 1.3 m/s to 1.4 m/s due to the density difference. Because live forest fuels contain large amounts of water, the evolution of both water and carbon dioxide was measured with time using a differential gas analyzer. Flaming ignition was seen for all dead fuels at 500°C, but the live fuels mostly showed glowing ignition. At 600°C, all fuels showed flaming ignition within 1-26 sec. Interestingly, all live fuels were still actively releasing water at ignition, implying there are steep temperature gradients within these physically thin fuels (i.e. not thermally thin). Simple heat transfer analysis in conjunction with the water evolution information was used to help explain the differences in ignition times due to fuel geometry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
森林燃料的对流点火
野火是一个代价高昂且致命的问题。树冠火灾是指活树叶点燃并燃烧的火灾,这种火灾尤其难以预测,部分原因是人们对活燃料的点燃和燃烧知之甚少。许多野火模型假设辐射是控制传热的机制。然而,越来越多的迹象表明,辐射不足以点燃携带野火的小而薄的燃料颗粒,对流加热和火焰沐浴是关键的组成部分。不幸的是,对任何燃料的对流加热点火都知之甚少。由于复杂的水分含量和燃料化学因素,用任何方法点燃森林燃料也是完全未知的。为了深入了解野火问题,我们建造了一个装置,使用两个6.5 kW的电加热器在从环境温度到1200°C的范围内加热气体(空气,氮气等)。这些“气枪”的流量是可调的。这个装置被用来对流点燃一系列的森林燃料,包括活的和死的。使用的燃料来自美国各地,包括南加州、犹他州、佛罗里达州和蒙大拿州。为了检查点火阈值条件并在点火时间上有可区分的差异,使用了500°C和600°C的空气温度。由于密度的差异,气流速率在1.3 m/s到1.4 m/s之间略有变化。由于活的森林燃料含有大量的水,因此使用差分气体分析仪随时间测量水和二氧化碳的演变。在500°C时,所有死燃料都有火焰点火,而活燃料大多有发光点火。在600°C时,所有燃料在1-26秒内都显示出燃烧着火。有趣的是,所有活燃料在着火时仍在积极地释放水,这意味着在这些物理薄的燃料(即不薄的热)中存在陡峭的温度梯度。简单的传热分析结合水演化信息被用来帮助解释由于燃料几何形状而导致的点火时间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enabling the Investigation of Structure Vulnerabilities to Wind- Driven Firebrand Showers in Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Fires Modeling of the pyrolysis of plywood exposed to heat fluxes under cone calorimeter Effective stress method to be used in beam finite elements to take local instabilities into account Spectral Aspects of Bench-Scale Flammability Testing: Application to Hardwood Pyrolysis Fundamental flame spread and toxicity evaluation of fire retarded polymers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1