Preoperative Assessment and Prediction of Consistency of Intracranial Meningioma Utilizing the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY Indian Journal of Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2022-09-27 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1750357
Venkatesh Pothula, Ajay Kumar, Sameer Vyas, V. Bhatia, B. Radotra, S. Gupta
{"title":"Preoperative Assessment and Prediction of Consistency of Intracranial Meningioma Utilizing the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values","authors":"Venkatesh Pothula, Ajay Kumar, Sameer Vyas, V. Bhatia, B. Radotra, S. Gupta","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1750357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Objectives Consistency of meningioma is important for preoperative planning, surgical resection, and predicting surgical outcomes. We prospectively evaluated the utility of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values to assess the consistency of meningioma.\n Methods Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on 23 patients with meningioma before undergoing surgical resection and the average/mean of ADC minimum (ADCmin), maximum (ADCmax), and mean (ADCmean) values were calculated. Intraoperatively, the meningiomas were characterized as firm or soft and correlated with ADC values.\n Results ADCmin, ADCmax, and ADCmean values of soft and firm meningiomas were significantly different with a p-value of < 0.05. ADCmin value of < 691.3 × 10−6 mm2/s had 80% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity for identifying firm from the soft tumors with the area under the curve (AUC) = 0.862, p-value of 0.004, positive predictive value (PPV) 80, and negative predictive value (NPV) 84.6. ADCmax value of < 933.6 × 10−6 mm2/s had 70% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity for identifying firm from the soft tumors with AUC = 0.823, p-value of 0.009, PPV 77.8, and NPV 78.6. ADCmean value of < 840.8 × 10−6 mm2/s had 90% sensitivity and 76.9% specificity for identifying firm from the soft tumors with AUC = 0.900, p-value of 0.001, PPV 75, and NPV 90.9.\n Conclusion Diffusion-weighted MRI using ADC minimum, ADC maximum, and ADC mean values can be used to differentiate firm from soft meningiomas. Meningiomas with hard consistency showed relatively low ADC values.","PeriodicalId":53938,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Consistency of meningioma is important for preoperative planning, surgical resection, and predicting surgical outcomes. We prospectively evaluated the utility of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values to assess the consistency of meningioma. Methods Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on 23 patients with meningioma before undergoing surgical resection and the average/mean of ADC minimum (ADCmin), maximum (ADCmax), and mean (ADCmean) values were calculated. Intraoperatively, the meningiomas were characterized as firm or soft and correlated with ADC values. Results ADCmin, ADCmax, and ADCmean values of soft and firm meningiomas were significantly different with a p-value of < 0.05. ADCmin value of < 691.3 × 10−6 mm2/s had 80% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity for identifying firm from the soft tumors with the area under the curve (AUC) = 0.862, p-value of 0.004, positive predictive value (PPV) 80, and negative predictive value (NPV) 84.6. ADCmax value of < 933.6 × 10−6 mm2/s had 70% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity for identifying firm from the soft tumors with AUC = 0.823, p-value of 0.009, PPV 77.8, and NPV 78.6. ADCmean value of < 840.8 × 10−6 mm2/s had 90% sensitivity and 76.9% specificity for identifying firm from the soft tumors with AUC = 0.900, p-value of 0.001, PPV 75, and NPV 90.9. Conclusion Diffusion-weighted MRI using ADC minimum, ADC maximum, and ADC mean values can be used to differentiate firm from soft meningiomas. Meningiomas with hard consistency showed relatively low ADC values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用表观扩散系数评价颅内脑膜瘤一致性的术前预测
目的脑膜瘤的一致性对术前计划、手术切除和预测手术结果具有重要意义。我们前瞻性地评估表观扩散系数(ADC)值在评估脑膜瘤一致性方面的效用。方法对23例脑膜瘤患者行术前磁共振成像(MRI)检查,计算ADC最小值(ADCmin)、最大值(ADCmax)和平均值(ADCmean)的平均值/平均值。术中脑膜瘤表现为硬或软,与ADC值相关。结果软质脑膜瘤和硬质脑膜瘤的ADCmin、ADCmax、ADCmean差异有统计学意义,p值均< 0.05。ADCmin值< 691.3 × 10−6 mm2/s对软质瘤的鉴别灵敏度为80%,特异度为84.6%,曲线下面积(AUC) = 0.862, p值为0.004,阳性预测值(PPV)为80,阴性预测值(NPV)为84.6。ADCmax值< 933.6 × 10−6 mm2/s对软质瘤的鉴别灵敏度为70%,特异度为84.6%,AUC = 0.823, p值为0.009,PPV为77.8,NPV为78.6。adc均值< 840.8 × 10−6 mm2/s,对软质瘤的鉴别灵敏度为90%,特异性为76.9%,AUC = 0.900, p值为0.001,PPV为75,NPV为90.9。结论弥散加权MRI ADC最小值、ADC最大值和ADC平均值可用于硬性脑膜瘤和软性脑膜瘤的鉴别。硬一致性脑膜瘤ADC值相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Silent Threat: Unraveling the Rare Catastrophic Complication after Elective Cranioplasty Venous Hemorrhagic Infarct Leading to Delayed Brain Abscess Formation: A Case Report Trans-Disc Aspiration of Anterior Cervical Cysts Identification of Population-Specific Novel Protein Biomarkers and Possible Therapeutic Targets in Gliomas by Proteomics Approach First Thousand Cases of Intracranial Radiosurgery Treated with Gamma Knife at a Tertiary Care Hospital in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1