Beyond Narratives of Aboriginal Self-deliverance: Land Rights and Anthropological Visibility in the Australian Public Domain

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropological Forum Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/00664677.2022.2084716
N. Peterson
{"title":"Beyond Narratives of Aboriginal Self-deliverance: Land Rights and Anthropological Visibility in the Australian Public Domain","authors":"N. Peterson","doi":"10.1080/00664677.2022.2084716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The central role that anthropologists play in Aboriginal land and native title claims is becoming less visible. In some ways, this is not surprising since minorities that need the help of others, if they are seeking recognition of their rights, are often uncomfortable being the beneficiaries of assistance, and the narratives they come to cherish are those of self-deliverance. However, the public discourses in which anthropology is involved also contribute to this decreasing visibility, particularly because the most important of them is the technical discourse that comes with being an expert witness in land and native title claims, where the contribution of lawyers and the law have a higher profile. A third factor is that for those people Emma Kowal (2015) calls white anti-racist, a category into which many anthropologists might be thought to fall, self-effacement is a foundational value, so that any contribution to improving Aboriginal circumstances should be obscured. But is that how anthropologists and the beneficiaries of this assistance think?","PeriodicalId":45505,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Forum","volume":"18 1","pages":"125 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2022.2084716","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The central role that anthropologists play in Aboriginal land and native title claims is becoming less visible. In some ways, this is not surprising since minorities that need the help of others, if they are seeking recognition of their rights, are often uncomfortable being the beneficiaries of assistance, and the narratives they come to cherish are those of self-deliverance. However, the public discourses in which anthropology is involved also contribute to this decreasing visibility, particularly because the most important of them is the technical discourse that comes with being an expert witness in land and native title claims, where the contribution of lawyers and the law have a higher profile. A third factor is that for those people Emma Kowal (2015) calls white anti-racist, a category into which many anthropologists might be thought to fall, self-effacement is a foundational value, so that any contribution to improving Aboriginal circumstances should be obscured. But is that how anthropologists and the beneficiaries of this assistance think?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越原住民自我解脱的叙述:澳洲公共领域的土地权与人类学能见度
人类学家在土著土地和土著权利主张中扮演的核心角色正变得越来越不明显。在某些方面,这并不奇怪,因为需要他人帮助的少数群体,如果他们正在寻求对自己权利的承认,往往会因为成为援助的受益者而感到不舒服,他们开始珍惜那些自我解脱的故事。然而,人类学所涉及的公共话语也导致了这种能见度的下降,特别是因为其中最重要的是作为土地和土著所有权主张的专家证人所带来的技术话语,在这些领域,律师和法律的贡献具有更高的知名度。第三个因素是,对于那些被Emma Kowal(2015)称为白人反种族主义者的人(许多人类学家可能被认为属于这一类)来说,自我淡化是一种基本价值观,因此任何对改善土著环境的贡献都应该被掩盖。但这就是人类学家和这种援助的受益者的想法吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropological Forum
Anthropological Forum ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Anthropological Forum is a journal of social anthropology and comparative sociology that was founded in 1963 and has a distinguished publication history. The journal provides a forum for both established and innovative approaches to anthropological research. A special section devoted to contributions on applied anthropology appears periodically. The editors are especially keen to publish new approaches based on ethnographic and theoretical work in the journal"s established areas of strength: Australian culture and society, Aboriginal Australia, Southeast Asia and the Pacific.
期刊最新文献
Politics of Shared Humanity: On Hospitality, Equality and the Spiritual in Rural Gambia. Article 1F and Anthropological Evidence: A Fine Line Between Justice and Injustice? The Multiple Roles of Socio-Anthropological Expert Evidence in Indigenous Land Claims: The Xukuru People Case Pastors, Preaching and Parking Lot Conversations: Clergy’s Tactics of LGBTQ+ Inclusion in Mainline Protestant Churches Environments and Socialities in Oceania – Changing Ideas and Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1