Age and symptoms as a triage method for per‐rectal bleeding

D. Lam, Catherine Lai-Yin Choy, S. Lam, S. Kwok
{"title":"Age and symptoms as a triage method for per‐rectal bleeding","authors":"D. Lam, Catherine Lai-Yin Choy, S. Lam, S. Kwok","doi":"10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00140.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \nPer-rectal bleeding is a common reason of surgical referral. The average waiting time in a busy clinic could be months, which should preferably be shortened for potentially serious cases. With little information on referral letters, other methods for triage have to be searched for. Age and symptoms as triage methods were evaluated. \n \nMethods: \nData from patients attending the United Christian Hospital specialist clinic for per-rectal bleeding were collected prospectively. The association between age and the prevalence of colorectal neoplasia was analysed. The most suitable cut-off age was determined by a receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve. For symptoms, a questionnaire to check for high-risk features of per-rectal bleeding was designed. Non-medically trained volunteers were instructed to interview each patient before the surgical consultation. A positive result for the questionnaire is the presence of high-risk features. The surgeons were unaware of the questionnaires’ findings. The results were compared with the final diagnosis. Positive diagnoses were defined as either malignancy or significant polyps. The sensitivity and specificity of age and the questionnaire were computed. \n \nResults: \nA total of 194 patients were interviewed. Twenty patients declined colonoscopy and were excluded, leaving 174 for analysis. The ROC curve showed 60 years to be the most suitable age for triage. The sensitivity and specificity of age (≥ 60 years old) was 73.1% and 62.8%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaire was 65.4% and 55.4%, respectively. The positive predictive value of age was 25.7%, which was increased to 33.6% with a positive questionnaire result. The negative predictive value of 93.0% by age alone was increased to 95.5% with a negative questionnaire result. \n \nConclusion: \nAge is a very effective triage criterion. Using 60 years of age as a cut-off point screens out low-risk patients effectively. A preconsultation-structured interview designed to identify high-risk symptoms has little additional triage benefit. \n \nChinese Abstract \n \n \n \nFigure Chinese Abstract. \n \n \n \nFigure Chinese Abstract. \n \n \n \nFigure Chinese Abstract. \n \n \n \nFigure Chinese Abstract. \n \n \n \nFigure Chinese Abstract.","PeriodicalId":7943,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong","volume":"120 1","pages":"77-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00140.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objective: Per-rectal bleeding is a common reason of surgical referral. The average waiting time in a busy clinic could be months, which should preferably be shortened for potentially serious cases. With little information on referral letters, other methods for triage have to be searched for. Age and symptoms as triage methods were evaluated. Methods: Data from patients attending the United Christian Hospital specialist clinic for per-rectal bleeding were collected prospectively. The association between age and the prevalence of colorectal neoplasia was analysed. The most suitable cut-off age was determined by a receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve. For symptoms, a questionnaire to check for high-risk features of per-rectal bleeding was designed. Non-medically trained volunteers were instructed to interview each patient before the surgical consultation. A positive result for the questionnaire is the presence of high-risk features. The surgeons were unaware of the questionnaires’ findings. The results were compared with the final diagnosis. Positive diagnoses were defined as either malignancy or significant polyps. The sensitivity and specificity of age and the questionnaire were computed. Results: A total of 194 patients were interviewed. Twenty patients declined colonoscopy and were excluded, leaving 174 for analysis. The ROC curve showed 60 years to be the most suitable age for triage. The sensitivity and specificity of age (≥ 60 years old) was 73.1% and 62.8%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaire was 65.4% and 55.4%, respectively. The positive predictive value of age was 25.7%, which was increased to 33.6% with a positive questionnaire result. The negative predictive value of 93.0% by age alone was increased to 95.5% with a negative questionnaire result. Conclusion: Age is a very effective triage criterion. Using 60 years of age as a cut-off point screens out low-risk patients effectively. A preconsultation-structured interview designed to identify high-risk symptoms has little additional triage benefit. Chinese Abstract Figure Chinese Abstract. Figure Chinese Abstract. Figure Chinese Abstract. Figure Chinese Abstract. Figure Chinese Abstract.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年龄和症状作为直肠出血的分诊方法
目的:直肠内出血是外科转诊的常见原因。在繁忙的诊所,平均等待时间可能长达数月,对于潜在的严重病例,最好缩短等待时间。由于关于推荐信的信息很少,因此必须寻找其他分类方法。评估年龄和症状作为分诊方法。方法:前瞻性地收集基督教联合医院专科门诊直肠出血患者的资料。分析了年龄与结直肠肿瘤发病率之间的关系。最合适的截止年龄由接收工作特征(ROC)曲线确定。在症状方面,设计了一份调查问卷来检查直肠出血的高危特征。未受过医学训练的志愿者被指示在手术会诊前与每位患者进行面谈。调查问卷的积极结果是高风险特征的存在。外科医生并不知道调查问卷的结果。结果与最终诊断结果进行比较。阳性诊断定义为恶性肿瘤或显著息肉。计算年龄和问卷的敏感性和特异性。结果:共访谈194例患者。20例患者拒绝结肠镜检查并被排除,留下174例进行分析。ROC曲线显示60岁是最适合分诊的年龄。年龄(≥60岁)的敏感性为73.1%,特异性为62.8%。问卷的敏感性为65.4%,特异性为55.4%。年龄的阳性预测值为25.7%,问卷结果为阳性的年龄预测值为33.6%。单纯年龄因素的阴性预测值由93.0%增加到95.5%,问卷结果为阴性。结论:年龄是一种非常有效的分诊标准。使用60岁作为分界点可以有效地筛选出低风险患者。旨在确定高危症状的会诊前结构化访谈几乎没有额外的分诊益处。中文摘要图中文摘要图中文摘要图中文摘要图中文摘要图中文摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The causes of synthetic vascular graft failure Skin substitutes: An overview Creation of a subcutaneous tunnel in antesternal oesophageal replacement with the aid of a rigid sigmoidoscope Evaluation of Hyphecan (1-4,2-acetamide-deoxy-B-D-glucan polymer) on wound healing in a rodent model Retained intra-aortic balloon pump catheter causing acute ischaemic limb: Report of two cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1