User Prices and Multiplicity in a Simple General Equilibrium Model

IF 0.6 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Finanzarchiv Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1628/fa-2022-0012
G. Economides, A. Philippopoulos
{"title":"User Prices and Multiplicity in a Simple General Equilibrium Model","authors":"G. Economides, A. Philippopoulos","doi":"10.1628/fa-2022-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use a simple general equilibrium model with multiple equilibria in the form of a co-ordination failure in which the government has the option to finance the provision of a merit good by using user prices. Our main results, derived analytically, are as follows: First, the introduction of a price mechanism for the merit good forces agents to internalize the social cost of publicly provided goods and this allows for higher public expenditures other things equal. Second, if the economy happens to end up at a high-employment equilib-rium, the introduction of user prices further improves private incentives and enhances aggregate efficiency, whereas it further deteriorates private incentives and hurts aggre-gate efficiency if the economy happens to end up at a low-employment equilibrium. Third, the mechanism of user prices breaks down as the publicly provided good becomes more and more public so that free-riding problems dominate, or when there is a thresh-old minimum level for this good that is sufficiently high as in the covid-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":45063,"journal":{"name":"Finanzarchiv","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finanzarchiv","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1628/fa-2022-0012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We use a simple general equilibrium model with multiple equilibria in the form of a co-ordination failure in which the government has the option to finance the provision of a merit good by using user prices. Our main results, derived analytically, are as follows: First, the introduction of a price mechanism for the merit good forces agents to internalize the social cost of publicly provided goods and this allows for higher public expenditures other things equal. Second, if the economy happens to end up at a high-employment equilib-rium, the introduction of user prices further improves private incentives and enhances aggregate efficiency, whereas it further deteriorates private incentives and hurts aggre-gate efficiency if the economy happens to end up at a low-employment equilibrium. Third, the mechanism of user prices breaks down as the publicly provided good becomes more and more public so that free-riding problems dominate, or when there is a thresh-old minimum level for this good that is sufficiently high as in the covid-19 pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个简单一般均衡模型中的用户价格和多重性
我们使用了一个简单的一般均衡模型,该模型以协调失败的形式存在多重均衡,在这种均衡中,政府可以选择通过使用用户价格来为价值商品的提供提供资金。我们分析得出的主要结果如下:首先,引入价值商品的价格机制,迫使代理人将公共提供商品的社会成本内部化,这允许在其他条件相同的情况下增加公共支出。其次,如果经济碰巧最终处于高就业均衡,用户价格的引入会进一步改善私人激励并提高总效率,而如果经济碰巧最终处于低就业均衡,用户价格的引入会进一步恶化私人激励并损害总效率。第三,当公共提供的商品变得越来越公开,搭便车问题占据主导地位时,或者当这种商品的最低门槛足够高时(如covid-19大流行),用户价格机制就会崩溃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Finanzarchiv
Finanzarchiv Multiple-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Plurality Rule, Majority Principle and Indeterminacy in German Elections Tax Competition and Leviathan with Decentralized Leadership Homeowner Subsidies and Suburban Living: Empirical Evidence from a Subsidy Repeal The Effect of an Employment Subsidy in Persistent Stagnation Improving Public Good Supply and Income Equality: Facing a Potential Trade-Off
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1