The Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter: preliminary validation of a personal recovery

Scott Hardie, R. Ion, J. Cumming, N. Henderson
{"title":"The Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter: preliminary validation of a personal recovery","authors":"Scott Hardie, R. Ion, J. Cumming, N. Henderson","doi":"10.1192/PB.BP.112.041889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims and method The Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC) is to date the only recovery outcomes instrument developed in Scotland. This paper describes the steps taken to initially assess its validity and reliability, including factorial analysis, internal consistency and a correlation benchmarking analysis.\n\nResults The I.ROC tool showed high internal consistency. Exploratory factor analysis indicated a two-factor structure comprising intrapersonal recovery (factor 1) and interpersonal recovery (factor 2), explaining between them over 50% of the variance in I.ROC scores. There were no redundant items and all loaded on at least one of the factors. The I.ROC significantly correlated with widely used existing instruments assessing both personal recovery and clinical outcomes.\n\nClinical implications I.ROC is a valid and reliable measure of recovery in mental health, preferred by service users when compared with well-established instruments. It could be used in clinical settings to map individual recovery, providing feedback for service users and helping to assess service outcomes.","PeriodicalId":89639,"journal":{"name":"The psychiatrist","volume":"16 1","pages":"221-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The psychiatrist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/PB.BP.112.041889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Aims and method The Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC) is to date the only recovery outcomes instrument developed in Scotland. This paper describes the steps taken to initially assess its validity and reliability, including factorial analysis, internal consistency and a correlation benchmarking analysis. Results The I.ROC tool showed high internal consistency. Exploratory factor analysis indicated a two-factor structure comprising intrapersonal recovery (factor 1) and interpersonal recovery (factor 2), explaining between them over 50% of the variance in I.ROC scores. There were no redundant items and all loaded on at least one of the factors. The I.ROC significantly correlated with widely used existing instruments assessing both personal recovery and clinical outcomes. Clinical implications I.ROC is a valid and reliable measure of recovery in mental health, preferred by service users when compared with well-established instruments. It could be used in clinical settings to map individual recovery, providing feedback for service users and helping to assess service outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人恢复结果计数器:个人恢复的初步验证
个人目标和方法恢复结果计数器(I.ROC)是迄今为止唯一的恢复结果仪器开发的苏格兰。本文描述了初步评估其有效性和可靠性所采取的步骤,包括析因分析,内部一致性和相关基准分析。结果I.ROC工具具有较高的内部一致性。探索性因子分析表明,存在一种双因子结构,包括人际恢复(因子1)和人际恢复(因子2),它们之间解释了超过50%的I.ROC评分差异。没有多余的项目,所有的加载至少一个因素。I.ROC与广泛使用的现有评估个人康复和临床结果的工具显著相关。临床意义1 . roc是一种有效可靠的心理健康恢复测量方法,与完善的工具相比,服务使用者更喜欢它。它可以在临床环境中用于描绘个人康复情况,为服务使用者提供反馈,并帮助评估服务结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Professor Thomas Trauer BA (Hons), PhD Psychiatric medications are no more effective Academic training in psychiatry Psychiatry needs more psychotherapy Adverse medication events in a psychiatric practice: a naturalistic study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1