Until Justice Be Done: America’s First Civil Rights Movement, from the Revolution to Reconstruction by Kate Masur (review)

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY CIVIL WAR HISTORY Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1353/cwh.2023.a904825
Silvana R. Siddali
{"title":"Until Justice Be Done: America’s First Civil Rights Movement, from the Revolution to Reconstruction by Kate Masur (review)","authors":"Silvana R. Siddali","doi":"10.1353/cwh.2023.a904825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In May 1865, just as the American states were beginning to ratify the Thirteenth Amendment, Frederick Douglass spoke on the precarity of Black civil rights in New York City. He asked his listeners to imagine “in what new skin” the “Old Snake” of racial oppression would come forth. He reminded them that before the Civil War, wherever Northern abolitionists had found the word white in state constitutional provisions and legislation, they immediately recognized a code word for slavery, and they “made war upon it” until the word had disappeared from their state constitutions and laws. But now, with the defeat of the Southern slave states, the time had come to finish that work. The destruction of slavery had not guaranteed Black rights—even the basic right to freedom—because the indignity of unequal treatment remained in place everywhere, not only in the former slave states of the Confederacy. Abolitionists, he argued, must now fight to eradicate racial discrimination and segregation throughout the nation. Douglass’s words appear near the end of Kate Masur’s important new book, but they encapsulate several of her core contributions to the field of civil rights history. First, she clarifies the earlynineteenth-century dispute over the contested and often contradictory meanings of freedom and rights, particularly in cases where free Black people possessed few legal tools to protect themselves from incarceration or even enslavement. Second, Masur teases apart the complicated subject of the fundamental rights of persons who claimed citizenship in one state but whose right to freedom was challenged in another state merely by virtue of their race. Finally, she explores how both proand anti-Black rights Americans developed constitutional tools in arguing for and against the civil rights of Black Americans. Douglass had contended that without the full and equal rights of citizenship, African Americans, and their white allies, would inevitably lose the fight for political equality. Moral and ethical arguments might have served as important weapons in the fight against slavery, but in order to establish fundamental constitutional rights of Black Americans,","PeriodicalId":43056,"journal":{"name":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","volume":"51 1","pages":"56 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CIVIL WAR HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.2023.a904825","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In May 1865, just as the American states were beginning to ratify the Thirteenth Amendment, Frederick Douglass spoke on the precarity of Black civil rights in New York City. He asked his listeners to imagine “in what new skin” the “Old Snake” of racial oppression would come forth. He reminded them that before the Civil War, wherever Northern abolitionists had found the word white in state constitutional provisions and legislation, they immediately recognized a code word for slavery, and they “made war upon it” until the word had disappeared from their state constitutions and laws. But now, with the defeat of the Southern slave states, the time had come to finish that work. The destruction of slavery had not guaranteed Black rights—even the basic right to freedom—because the indignity of unequal treatment remained in place everywhere, not only in the former slave states of the Confederacy. Abolitionists, he argued, must now fight to eradicate racial discrimination and segregation throughout the nation. Douglass’s words appear near the end of Kate Masur’s important new book, but they encapsulate several of her core contributions to the field of civil rights history. First, she clarifies the earlynineteenth-century dispute over the contested and often contradictory meanings of freedom and rights, particularly in cases where free Black people possessed few legal tools to protect themselves from incarceration or even enslavement. Second, Masur teases apart the complicated subject of the fundamental rights of persons who claimed citizenship in one state but whose right to freedom was challenged in another state merely by virtue of their race. Finally, she explores how both proand anti-Black rights Americans developed constitutional tools in arguing for and against the civil rights of Black Americans. Douglass had contended that without the full and equal rights of citizenship, African Americans, and their white allies, would inevitably lose the fight for political equality. Moral and ethical arguments might have served as important weapons in the fight against slavery, but in order to establish fundamental constitutional rights of Black Americans,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直到正义得到伸张:美国第一次民权运动,从革命到重建凯特·马苏尔(书评)
1865年5月,正当美国各州开始批准第十三修正案时,弗雷德里克·道格拉斯(Frederick Douglass)在纽约市就黑人民权的不稳定性发表了讲话。他让听众想象一下,种族压迫的“老蛇”会以什么样的新面目出现。他提醒他们,在南北战争之前,只要北方废奴主义者在州宪法条款和立法中发现“白人”这个词,他们就会立即认出这是奴隶制的暗号,并“向它发动战争”,直到这个词从州宪法和法律中消失。但是现在,随着南方蓄奴州的失败,完成这项工作的时机已经到来。奴隶制的废除并没有保证黑人的权利——甚至是基本的自由权利——因为不平等待遇的侮辱在各地都存在,不仅仅是在南部联盟的前奴隶制州。他认为,废奴主义者现在必须为消除全国的种族歧视和种族隔离而斗争。道格拉斯的话出现在凯特·马苏尔重要的新书的末尾,但它们概括了她对民权历史领域的几项核心贡献。首先,她澄清了19世纪早期关于自由和权利的争议和经常相互矛盾的含义的争论,特别是在自由的黑人几乎没有法律工具来保护自己免受监禁甚至奴役的情况下。其次,马苏尔对一些人的基本权利这个复杂的问题进行了揶揄,这些人在一个州声称自己是公民,但在另一个州,他们的自由权利仅仅因为他们的种族而受到挑战。最后,她探讨了支持和反对黑人权利的美国人如何发展宪法工具来支持和反对美国黑人的公民权利。道格拉斯认为,如果没有充分和平等的公民权利,非裔美国人和他们的白人盟友将不可避免地在争取政治平等的斗争中失败。道德和伦理争论可能是反对奴隶制的重要武器,但为了确立美国黑人的基本宪法权利,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Civil War History is the foremost scholarly journal of the sectional conflict in the United States, focusing on social, cultural, economic, political, and military issues from antebellum America through Reconstruction. Articles have featured research on slavery, abolitionism, women and war, Abraham Lincoln, fiction, national identity, and various aspects of the Northern and Southern military. Published quarterly in March, June, September, and December.
期刊最新文献
Contesting "the Insatiable Maw of Capital": Mine Workers' Struggles in the Civil War Era Contributors The Open-Shop Movement and the Long Shadow of Slavery, the Civil War, and Reconstruction Book Review Essay: After War and Emancipation, an Irrepressible Conflict "We Can Take Care of Ourselves Now": Establishing Independent Black Labor and Industry in Postwar Yorktown, Virginia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1