A Review of Privacy Decision-making Mechanisms in Online Social Networks

José Alemany, E. Noguera, A. García-Fornes
{"title":"A Review of Privacy Decision-making Mechanisms in Online Social Networks","authors":"José Alemany, E. Noguera, A. García-Fornes","doi":"10.1145/3494067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Personal information of online social networks (OSNs) is governed by the privacy policies chosen by users besides OSN’s policies. Users make these decisions using privacy mechanisms, but privacy problems and regrets are daily reported. This article reviews current privacy mechanisms and solutions. For this, we analyze all the sub-decisions and elements of online communication involved in the privacy decision-making process. However, the differences in users’ motivations and the disclosure of too sensitive information (among others) can lead to loss of privacy. In this work, we identify requirements such as automation, preference-centered, relationship-based, and multi-party privacy mechanisms, which have been more researched. But also other requirements (recently emerged), such as privacy preservation with risk metrics, explainability, and ephemeral messages. We explore all the advances made in the literature, and we have seen that most of these have been focused on matching the users’ preferences with their decision (which is not appropriate, because users cannot evaluate all of the potential privacy scenarios) instead of assessing privacy risk metrics, adaptation, and explainability. Therefore, we have identified open challenges, such as metrics for assessing privacy risks, explainable solutions for users, ephemeral communication solutions, and the application of these requirements to the multi-party privacy scenario.","PeriodicalId":7000,"journal":{"name":"ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)","volume":"3 1","pages":"1 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3494067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Personal information of online social networks (OSNs) is governed by the privacy policies chosen by users besides OSN’s policies. Users make these decisions using privacy mechanisms, but privacy problems and regrets are daily reported. This article reviews current privacy mechanisms and solutions. For this, we analyze all the sub-decisions and elements of online communication involved in the privacy decision-making process. However, the differences in users’ motivations and the disclosure of too sensitive information (among others) can lead to loss of privacy. In this work, we identify requirements such as automation, preference-centered, relationship-based, and multi-party privacy mechanisms, which have been more researched. But also other requirements (recently emerged), such as privacy preservation with risk metrics, explainability, and ephemeral messages. We explore all the advances made in the literature, and we have seen that most of these have been focused on matching the users’ preferences with their decision (which is not appropriate, because users cannot evaluate all of the potential privacy scenarios) instead of assessing privacy risk metrics, adaptation, and explainability. Therefore, we have identified open challenges, such as metrics for assessing privacy risks, explainable solutions for users, ephemeral communication solutions, and the application of these requirements to the multi-party privacy scenario.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线社交网络中的隐私决策机制研究综述
OSN (online social networks)的个人信息除了受OSN策略的约束外,还受用户选择的隐私策略的约束。用户使用隐私机制做出这些决定,但隐私问题和遗憾每天都有报告。本文回顾了当前的隐私机制和解决方案。为此,我们分析了隐私决策过程中涉及的所有在线交流子决策和要素。然而,用户动机的差异和过于敏感的信息(以及其他)的披露可能导致隐私的丧失。在这项工作中,我们确定了自动化、以偏好为中心、基于关系和多方隐私机制等需求,这些需求已经得到了更多的研究。但也有其他需求(最近出现的),例如带有风险度量、可解释性和短暂消息的隐私保护。我们探索了文献中取得的所有进展,我们已经看到,其中大多数都集中在将用户的偏好与他们的决定相匹配(这是不合适的,因为用户无法评估所有潜在的隐私场景),而不是评估隐私风险指标、适应性和可解释性。因此,我们已经确定了开放的挑战,例如评估隐私风险的指标,用户可解释的解决方案,临时通信解决方案,以及将这些要求应用于多方隐私场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental Comparisons of Clustering Approaches for Data Representation On the Structure of the Boolean Satisfiability Problem: A Survey A Brief Overview of Universal Sentence Representation Methods: A Linguistic View The Eye in Extended Reality: A Survey on Gaze Interaction and Eye Tracking in Head-worn Extended Reality A Comprehensive Report on Machine Learning-based Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease using Multi-modal Neuroimaging Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1