A. Monteath, Matthew S. M. Bolton, J. Harvey, M. Seidenkrantz, C. Pearce, B. Jensen
{"title":"Ultra-distal tephra deposits and Bayesian modelling constrain a variable marine radiocarbon offset in Placentia Bay, Newfoundland","authors":"A. Monteath, Matthew S. M. Bolton, J. Harvey, M. Seidenkrantz, C. Pearce, B. Jensen","doi":"10.5194/gchron-5-229-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Radiocarbon dating marine sediments is complicated by the\nstrongly heterogeneous age of ocean waters. Tephrochronology provides a\nwell-established method to constrain the age of local radiocarbon reservoirs\nand more accurately calibrate dates. Numerous ultra-distal cryptotephra\ndeposits (non-visible volcanic ash more than 3000 km from source) have\nbeen identified in peatlands and lake sediments across north-eastern North\nAmerica and correlated with volcanic arcs in the Pacific north-west.\nPreviously, however, these isochrons have not been identified in sediments\nfrom the north-west Atlantic Ocean. In this study, we report the presence of\ntwo ultra-distal cryptotephra deposits; Mazama Ash and White River Ash\neastern lobe (WRAe), in Placentia Bay, North Atlantic Ocean. We use these\nwell-dated isochrons to constrain the local marine radiocarbon reservoir\noffset (ΔR) and develop a robust Bayesian age–depth model with a\nΔR that varies through time. Our results indicate that the marine\nradiocarbon offset in Placentia Bay was -126±151 years (relative to\nthe Marine20 calibration curve) at the time of Mazama Ash deposition\n(7572 ± 18 yr BP) and −396 ± 144 years at the time of WRAe\ndeposition (1098–1097 yr BP). Changes in ΔR appear to coincide with\ninferred shifts in relative influences of the inner Labrador Current and the\nSlopewater Current in the bay. An important conclusion is that single-offset\nmodels of ΔR are easiest to apply and often hard to disprove.\nHowever, such models may oversimplify reservoir effects in a core, even over\nrelatively short timescales. Acknowledging potentially varying offsets is\ncritical when ocean circulation and ventilation characteristics have\ndiffered over time. The addition of tephra isochrons permits the calculation\nof semi-independent reservoir corrections and verification of the single\nΔR model.\n","PeriodicalId":12723,"journal":{"name":"Geochronology","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochronology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-5-229-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract. Radiocarbon dating marine sediments is complicated by the
strongly heterogeneous age of ocean waters. Tephrochronology provides a
well-established method to constrain the age of local radiocarbon reservoirs
and more accurately calibrate dates. Numerous ultra-distal cryptotephra
deposits (non-visible volcanic ash more than 3000 km from source) have
been identified in peatlands and lake sediments across north-eastern North
America and correlated with volcanic arcs in the Pacific north-west.
Previously, however, these isochrons have not been identified in sediments
from the north-west Atlantic Ocean. In this study, we report the presence of
two ultra-distal cryptotephra deposits; Mazama Ash and White River Ash
eastern lobe (WRAe), in Placentia Bay, North Atlantic Ocean. We use these
well-dated isochrons to constrain the local marine radiocarbon reservoir
offset (ΔR) and develop a robust Bayesian age–depth model with a
ΔR that varies through time. Our results indicate that the marine
radiocarbon offset in Placentia Bay was -126±151 years (relative to
the Marine20 calibration curve) at the time of Mazama Ash deposition
(7572 ± 18 yr BP) and −396 ± 144 years at the time of WRAe
deposition (1098–1097 yr BP). Changes in ΔR appear to coincide with
inferred shifts in relative influences of the inner Labrador Current and the
Slopewater Current in the bay. An important conclusion is that single-offset
models of ΔR are easiest to apply and often hard to disprove.
However, such models may oversimplify reservoir effects in a core, even over
relatively short timescales. Acknowledging potentially varying offsets is
critical when ocean circulation and ventilation characteristics have
differed over time. The addition of tephra isochrons permits the calculation
of semi-independent reservoir corrections and verification of the single
ΔR model.
摘要海洋沉积物的放射性碳定年由于海水的强烈不均匀年龄而变得复杂。温度年代学提供了一种完善的方法来限制当地放射性碳储层的年龄,并更准确地校准日期。在北美东北部的泥炭地和湖泊沉积物中发现了许多超远端隐火山灰沉积物(距离源头超过3000公里的不可见火山灰),并与太平洋西北部的火山弧相关联。然而,在此之前,这些等时线并没有在西北大西洋的沉积物中被发现。在这项研究中,我们报告了两个超远端隐肾沉积物的存在;北大西洋普拉森西亚湾的马扎马灰和白河灰东叶(WRAe)。我们使用这些年代确定的等时线来约束当地海洋放射性碳储层偏移(ΔR),并利用aΔR建立了一个稳健的贝叶斯年龄-深度模型,该模型随时间变化。结果表明,在Mazama Ash沉积(7572±18 yr BP)和wrae沉积(1098 ~ 1097 yr BP)期间,Placentia Bay的海洋放射性碳补偿分别为-126±151年和- 396±144年(相对于Marine20校准曲线)。ΔR的变化似乎与推断出的拉布拉多内流和海湾内坡面水流相对影响的变化相吻合。一个重要的结论是,ΔR的单次补偿模型最容易应用,而且往往很难反驳。然而,这种模型可能过于简化岩心中的储层效应,甚至过于短的时间尺度。当海洋环流和通风特征随时间变化时,承认潜在的不同抵消是至关重要的。tephra等时线的加入允许计算半独立的储层改正和验证singleΔR模型。