Mapping the desktop research in Pakistan: a bibliometric analysis

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Global Knowledge Memory and Communication Pub Date : 2023-03-07 DOI:10.1108/gkmc-07-2022-0159
Nazia Wahid, U. Amin, Muhammad Ajmal Khan, Nadeem Siddique, N. Warraich
{"title":"Mapping the desktop research in Pakistan: a bibliometric analysis","authors":"Nazia Wahid, U. Amin, Muhammad Ajmal Khan, Nadeem Siddique, N. Warraich","doi":"10.1108/gkmc-07-2022-0159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to map the “Desktop Research” (DR) output in Pakistan, as part of the growing field of research globally. It also ascertains the productive institutions and prolific authors along with their collaboration patterns.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nBibliometric techniques were used to quantitatively analyze the DR published in Pakistan. The publications from 1981 to 2021 were retrieved from Scopus. A total of 1,802 publications were retrieved and used for analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nResults indicated an unpredictable increase in DR output from approximately 100 to 400 records during the past five years. The year 2020 was most productive in DR research showing the excess use of secondary data by researchers in COVID-19. The focus of researchers towards DR was consistently rising. Medical journals were found to publish DR extensively. Majority of the publications were contributed by collaborative work and researchers of the USA were found as the most collaborative with Pakistani authors. Publications of single category journals, open access journals and international collaboration get more citations.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe results of the analysis rely only on a single database, Scopus, for retrieving the publication data.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study has practical implications for the policymakers and higher education development organizations to introduce the DR as a course in academic schools.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to review DR in the context of Pakistan through bibliometric analysis. This comprehensive overview provides a better understanding of the development of the field and possible practice implications.\n","PeriodicalId":43718,"journal":{"name":"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-07-2022-0159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to map the “Desktop Research” (DR) output in Pakistan, as part of the growing field of research globally. It also ascertains the productive institutions and prolific authors along with their collaboration patterns. Design/methodology/approach Bibliometric techniques were used to quantitatively analyze the DR published in Pakistan. The publications from 1981 to 2021 were retrieved from Scopus. A total of 1,802 publications were retrieved and used for analysis. Findings Results indicated an unpredictable increase in DR output from approximately 100 to 400 records during the past five years. The year 2020 was most productive in DR research showing the excess use of secondary data by researchers in COVID-19. The focus of researchers towards DR was consistently rising. Medical journals were found to publish DR extensively. Majority of the publications were contributed by collaborative work and researchers of the USA were found as the most collaborative with Pakistani authors. Publications of single category journals, open access journals and international collaboration get more citations. Research limitations/implications The results of the analysis rely only on a single database, Scopus, for retrieving the publication data. Practical implications The study has practical implications for the policymakers and higher education development organizations to introduce the DR as a course in academic schools. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to review DR in the context of Pakistan through bibliometric analysis. This comprehensive overview provides a better understanding of the development of the field and possible practice implications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制巴基斯坦桌面研究:文献计量学分析
本研究旨在绘制巴基斯坦的“桌面研究”(DR)产出图,这是全球不断发展的研究领域的一部分。它还确定了生产机构和多产作者及其合作模式。设计/方法学/方法文献计量学技术用于定量分析在巴基斯坦出版的DR。1981 - 2021年的出版物检索自Scopus。共检索了1,802份出版物并用于分析。结果表明,在过去五年中,DR输出从大约100条增加到400条,这是不可预测的。2020年是DR研究最富有成效的一年,研究人员在COVID-19研究中大量使用了二手数据。研究人员对DR的关注一直在上升。医学杂志被发现大量发表DR。大多数出版物是由合作工作贡献的,美国研究人员被发现与巴基斯坦作者合作最多。单类期刊、开放获取期刊和国际合作期刊的被引次数较多。研究限制/启示分析结果仅依赖于一个数据库Scopus来检索出版数据。本研究对政策制定者和高等教育发展组织在学术院校中引入DR课程具有现实意义。原创性/价值据作者所知,本研究是第一个通过文献计量学分析在巴基斯坦背景下回顾DR的研究。这个全面的概述提供了一个更好的理解该领域的发展和可能的实践影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
77
期刊最新文献
Mapping covid-19 and transportation: a taxonomical study using bibliometric visualisation The persistence of print books: exploring language preference and format preference among Arabic-speaking library patrons in Jordan A checklist to publish collections as data in GLAM institutions A systematic literature review on the use of mobile phones to access library services and resources: challenges and benefits Citation analysis and mapping of genetics research in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1