A tool for reducing the time loss and dissatisfaction associated with meetings: Validation of the staff meeting effectiveness questionnaire

IF 1.2 Q3 COMMUNICATION Communication Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/22041451.2021.2021693
Louis C. Belisle, Maxime Paquet, Nathalie Lafranchise
{"title":"A tool for reducing the time loss and dissatisfaction associated with meetings: Validation of the staff meeting effectiveness questionnaire","authors":"Louis C. Belisle, Maxime Paquet, Nathalie Lafranchise","doi":"10.1080/22041451.2021.2021693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Workplace meetings have a bad reputation and are often perceived as ineffective. However, few scientific tools are available to evaluate meeting effectiveness and to enable facilitators to improve. The aim of this paper is to describe the content and construct validation of the Staff Meeting Effectiveness Questionnaire. A review of the scientific and professional literature revealed five themes and 21 sub-themes as a basis for evaluating meeting effectiveness, or lack thereof. From these themes, we built a pilot questionnaire containing 60 items that was submitted to a sample of 575 healthcare managers. The responses were analysed using principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, which reduced the questionnaire to 42 items organised under 10 factors that possess satisfactory psychometric properties.","PeriodicalId":10644,"journal":{"name":"Communication Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2021.2021693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Workplace meetings have a bad reputation and are often perceived as ineffective. However, few scientific tools are available to evaluate meeting effectiveness and to enable facilitators to improve. The aim of this paper is to describe the content and construct validation of the Staff Meeting Effectiveness Questionnaire. A review of the scientific and professional literature revealed five themes and 21 sub-themes as a basis for evaluating meeting effectiveness, or lack thereof. From these themes, we built a pilot questionnaire containing 60 items that was submitted to a sample of 575 healthcare managers. The responses were analysed using principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, which reduced the questionnaire to 42 items organised under 10 factors that possess satisfactory psychometric properties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少与会议相关的时间损失和不满的工具:确认员工会议有效性问卷
职场会议名声不佳,通常被认为是无效的。然而,很少有科学的工具可用于评估会议的有效性,并使主持人能够改进。本文的目的是描述员工会议有效性问卷的内容并构建验证。对科学和专业文献的审查揭示了五个主题和21个次级主题,作为评价会议有效性或缺乏有效性的基础。根据这些主题,我们构建了一份包含60个项目的试点问卷,提交给575名医疗保健管理人员。使用主成分分析和验证性因子分析分析的反应,这将问卷减少到42个项目组织下的10个因素,具有令人满意的心理测量特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Four provocations for rich digital ethnographic research situated in social media networks Devising an ethical ‘death knock’ model: the role of preparations, precursors, and professional identity in mitigating moral injury for journalists Enhancing transmedia component through world building; the case of Ejen Ali franchise The demographics of digital disconnection: prevalence, motives and barriers to disconnecting from the Internet in Aotearoa New Zealand Stakeholder engagement and chaotic narrative spaces: Singapore’s COVID-19 outbreak in foreign-worker dormitories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1