Behavior engagement as a measure of the efficacy of early intervention

R.A. McWilliam, Carol M. Trivette, Carl J. Dunst
{"title":"Behavior engagement as a measure of the efficacy of early intervention","authors":"R.A. McWilliam,&nbsp;Carol M. Trivette,&nbsp;Carl J. Dunst","doi":"10.1016/S0270-4684(85)80006-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated the usefulness of behavior engagement as an outcome measure for discerning the efficacy of intervention efforts, broadly conceived as specific attempts at affecting child performance through environmental manipulation. Engagement refers to the <em>amount of time</em> children spend interacting with the environment in a developmentally appropriate manner. Levels of engagement were measured using the Planned Activity Check (PLA-Check) among preschool mentally retarded, handicapped, at-risk, and nonhandicapped children participating in two different types of programs. One was traditional in orientation and the other nontraditional. The traditional program focused on the children manifesting discrete forms of criterion behavior, while the nontraditional program emphasized engagement as the focus of classroom efforts. PLA-Checks were taken during four classroom activities on 2 separate days. The results showed the engagement levels differed as a function of program type and classroom activities within programs. Engagement levels were found to be consistently more stable in the nontraditional program. The findings were discussed in terms of the usefulness of engagement as a behavioral measure of the efficacy of early intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100080,"journal":{"name":"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0270-4684(85)80006-9","citationCount":"112","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0270468485800069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 112

Abstract

This study investigated the usefulness of behavior engagement as an outcome measure for discerning the efficacy of intervention efforts, broadly conceived as specific attempts at affecting child performance through environmental manipulation. Engagement refers to the amount of time children spend interacting with the environment in a developmentally appropriate manner. Levels of engagement were measured using the Planned Activity Check (PLA-Check) among preschool mentally retarded, handicapped, at-risk, and nonhandicapped children participating in two different types of programs. One was traditional in orientation and the other nontraditional. The traditional program focused on the children manifesting discrete forms of criterion behavior, while the nontraditional program emphasized engagement as the focus of classroom efforts. PLA-Checks were taken during four classroom activities on 2 separate days. The results showed the engagement levels differed as a function of program type and classroom activities within programs. Engagement levels were found to be consistently more stable in the nontraditional program. The findings were discussed in terms of the usefulness of engagement as a behavioral measure of the efficacy of early intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为投入作为早期干预效果的衡量标准
本研究调查了行为参与作为一种识别干预效果的结果测量的有用性,干预效果被广泛地理解为通过环境操纵影响儿童表现的具体尝试。参与指的是儿童以发展适当的方式与环境互动的时间。使用计划活动检查(PLA-Check)来测量学龄前智障儿童、残疾儿童、高危儿童和非残疾儿童参与两种不同类型项目的参与程度。一个是传统的,另一个是非传统的。传统项目关注的是表现出离散形式的标准行为的儿童,而非传统项目强调课堂努力的重点是参与。在2天的4次课堂活动中进行pla检查。结果显示,参与程度随课程类型和课程内课堂活动的不同而不同。研究发现,在非传统课程中,参与程度始终更加稳定。研究结果讨论了参与作为早期干预效果的行为测量的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Preface Control by exclusion in arbitrary matching-to-sample Stimulus control of eye orientations: Shaping S+ only versus shaping S- only An equivalence model for vocabulary acquisition in profoundly hearing-impaired children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1