Between New Sensibility and Transgression: Slovenian Alternative Artistic Practices – OHO and NSK

IF 0.1 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, SLAVIC Primerjalna Knjizevnost Pub Date : 2020-11-08 DOI:10.3986/pkn.v43.i3.04
M. Šuvaković
{"title":"Between New Sensibility and Transgression: Slovenian Alternative Artistic Practices – OHO and NSK","authors":"M. Šuvaković","doi":"10.3986/pkn.v43.i3.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article conducts a comparative discussion on the strategic poetic and political similarities/differences between the respective contexts of neo-avantgarde and retro-avant-garde practices in relation to aesthetic, artistic, and cultural revolutions. I juxtapose two revolutionary potentials and effects of their actualisation: the utopias and projections of the international revolution relating to the “new sensibility” and the unity of “art and life” of 1968, and several projects and practices that undermine totalitarian systems, from punk cynicism to the national revolutions of 1989 that overthrew real socialism in the Eastern and Central Europe. In my comparative discussion I focus on two specific cases in Slovenian art and alternative cultures, highlighting the position of “experimental poetry,” “new sensibility,” and “conceptual art” of the OHO group, active between 1966 and 1971, and the position of “political cynicism” and “retro-avant-garde art” in the Neue Slowenische Kunst movement founded in 1984.","PeriodicalId":52032,"journal":{"name":"Primerjalna Knjizevnost","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primerjalna Knjizevnost","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3986/pkn.v43.i3.04","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article conducts a comparative discussion on the strategic poetic and political similarities/differences between the respective contexts of neo-avantgarde and retro-avant-garde practices in relation to aesthetic, artistic, and cultural revolutions. I juxtapose two revolutionary potentials and effects of their actualisation: the utopias and projections of the international revolution relating to the “new sensibility” and the unity of “art and life” of 1968, and several projects and practices that undermine totalitarian systems, from punk cynicism to the national revolutions of 1989 that overthrew real socialism in the Eastern and Central Europe. In my comparative discussion I focus on two specific cases in Slovenian art and alternative cultures, highlighting the position of “experimental poetry,” “new sensibility,” and “conceptual art” of the OHO group, active between 1966 and 1971, and the position of “political cynicism” and “retro-avant-garde art” in the Neue Slowenische Kunst movement founded in 1984.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在新的感性和越界之间:斯洛文尼亚的另类艺术实践- OHO和NSK
本文对新先锋和复古先锋实践在美学、艺术和文化革命中各自语境的诗歌战略和政治异同进行了比较讨论。我并列地列出了两种革命潜力及其实现的影响:与1968年“新感性”和“艺术与生活”的统一有关的国际革命的乌托邦和预测,以及从朋克犬儒主义到1989年推翻东欧和中欧真正社会主义的民族革命的几个破坏极权主义制度的项目和实践。在我的比较讨论中,我将重点放在斯洛文尼亚艺术和另类文化的两个具体案例上,强调1966年至1971年间活跃的OHO团体的“实验诗歌”、“新感性”和“观念艺术”的地位,以及1984年成立的新慢艺术运动中的“政治犬儒主义”和“复古前卫艺术”的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Primerjalna Knjizevnost
Primerjalna Knjizevnost LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Moč odsotnega: eluzivnost resničnosti v dveh Antigonah »Nič drugega kot nič«: negativna teopolitika Sofoklove Antigone O veličini in dostojanstvu žrtve: antropološki nauk Sofoklove Antigone Svetovna primerjalna književnost The Concretization of the Literary Work of Art: Elements for a Comparison between Roman Ingarden and Wolfgang Iser
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1