Exploring Faculty and Student Reflections on Collaborative Teaching in the Honors Seminar Classroom

Ruxandra Looft, M. Myers
{"title":"Exploring Faculty and Student Reflections on Collaborative Teaching in the Honors Seminar Classroom","authors":"Ruxandra Looft, M. Myers","doi":"10.32674/JISE.V8I1.1019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"University Honors programming in the United States is interdisciplinary and collaborative; from First Year Honors Seminars to capstone research projects for upperclassmen, Honors students embrace multidisciplinary learning and research. This approach, however, does not always translate into the Honors classroom in regards to an incorporation of diverse perspectives of multiple faculty members in a given course. This article utilizes a mixed-methods approach to explore the impact and results of a collaboratively taught Honors Seminar. “Exploring Faculty and Student Reflections on Collaborative Teaching in the Honors Seminar Classroom” departs from the authors’ model of a co-taught Honors Seminar and then moves to an exploration of the student responses, comparing both a pre- and post-course survey, that considers student perceptions of multi-instructor formats. The essay ends with a brief conclusion that addresses some possible challenges to team-taught courses, from scheduling to institutional issues, in the context of Honors programming in an effort to encourage continued discussion about collaborative teaching of Honors Seminars.","PeriodicalId":93779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interdisciplinary studies in education","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interdisciplinary studies in education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32674/JISE.V8I1.1019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

University Honors programming in the United States is interdisciplinary and collaborative; from First Year Honors Seminars to capstone research projects for upperclassmen, Honors students embrace multidisciplinary learning and research. This approach, however, does not always translate into the Honors classroom in regards to an incorporation of diverse perspectives of multiple faculty members in a given course. This article utilizes a mixed-methods approach to explore the impact and results of a collaboratively taught Honors Seminar. “Exploring Faculty and Student Reflections on Collaborative Teaching in the Honors Seminar Classroom” departs from the authors’ model of a co-taught Honors Seminar and then moves to an exploration of the student responses, comparing both a pre- and post-course survey, that considers student perceptions of multi-instructor formats. The essay ends with a brief conclusion that addresses some possible challenges to team-taught courses, from scheduling to institutional issues, in the context of Honors programming in an effort to encourage continued discussion about collaborative teaching of Honors Seminars.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索荣誉研讨会课堂中师生合作教学的思考
美国的大学荣誉课程是跨学科和合作性的;从第一年的荣誉研讨会到高年级学生的顶级研究项目,荣誉学生接受多学科的学习和研究。然而,这种方法并不总是适用于荣誉课堂,因为在给定的课程中,许多教师的不同观点都被纳入其中。本文采用混合方法来探讨合作教学的荣誉研讨会的影响和结果。“探索教师和学生对荣誉研讨会课堂合作教学的思考”偏离了作者共同教授荣誉研讨会的模式,然后转向探索学生的反应,比较了课程前和课程后的调查,考虑了学生对多讲师形式的看法。文章以一个简短的结论结尾,指出了在荣誉课程的背景下,团队授课课程可能面临的一些挑战,从日程安排到制度问题,以鼓励继续讨论荣誉研讨会的合作教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining the First Peer-to-Peer Mentorship Program (F1Doctors) for International Medical Students. How to Improve the Validity and Reliability of a Case Study Approach? Going to University: The Influence of Higher Education on the Lives of Young South Africans Kenya’s 2017 Basic Education Curriculum Framework Educating Humans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1